BetterCloud vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) comparison

BetterCloud and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. BetterCloud is ranked #36 with an average rating of 6.0, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. BetterCloud holds a 0.6% mindshare in DLP, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BetterCloud users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

BetterCloud

Read 2 BetterCloud reviews

1,679 Views
772 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 76 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

10,727 Views
1,609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BetterCloud

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

BetterCloud and Check Point WAF are competing products in the cloud security space. BetterCloud seems to have the upper hand in SaaS management optimization, while Check Point WAF excels in web application security.

Features: BetterCloud offers capabilities in streamlining SaaS management, automating administrative tasks, and ensuring compliance monitoring. It simplifies the management of application policies and workflows. Check Point WAF focuses on web application security through threat prevention, guarding against known vulnerabilities, and utilizing advanced threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BetterCloud is known for its easy deployment and flexible integration. It provides strong support for initial setup and ongoing user needs. By contrast, Check Point WAF involves more complex deployment due to technical configurations but provides detailed documentation and solid technical support to complement its security-focused offerings.

Pricing and ROI: BetterCloud generally offers a predictable pricing model with a focus on ROI through efficiency in SaaS management. Check Point WAF, while potentially more expensive, justifies costs with top-notch web application protection, offering a strong ROI for businesses prioritizing security.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BetterCloud

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

36th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (14th), SaaS Management Platforms (9th)

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of BetterCloud is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.7%
BetterCloud	0.6%
Other	98.7%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

PaulHeard

CIO at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Experienced easy deployment and stable performance but user support needs improvement

The most valuable features are that BetterCloud had a much more sophisticated workflow management toolset than Google itself. It was easy to build onboarding and offboarding workflows, which could handle the desired complexity versus out-of-the-box Google. BetterCloud allowed us to reallocate storage so all files created by a departing member would get reallocated to the manager, thus retaining access. BetterCloud saved help desk time by automating processes, providing a reasonable return on investment. BetterCloud now offers SaaS platform tracking capabilities, a key, previously missing feature.

Read full review

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You simply cannot use Google Apps without it, so it's a no brainer."

"BetterCloud saved help desk time by automating processes, providing a reasonable return on investment."

"We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."

"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use and multiple functionalities."

"CloudGuard WAF has been great."

"Overall, the product is excellent."

"Overall, it's a good solution, and it fulfills all our core purposes, providing complete visibility and security."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is the one-stop solution for the security of applications and providing API protection to servers and facilities 24/7."

"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

Cons

"Would love for it to be able to replace our SSO as well as provide connectivity and the same level of automation to our other SaaS products."

"The account support team was weak in engagement and communication, contributing to the decision to move to more comprehensive solutions."

"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) could improve by addressing the new day-to-day attacks and issues that arise in the environment and globally dealing with attacks."

"The negative side I see is that while most things about Check Point CloudGuard WAF are really good, there is some latency and performance issues, as it can be slow to log in, especially from different regions."

"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved in several ways. We have faced slowness issues in our network after onboarding it on any application."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF could be improved by simplifying the initial setup for a faster deployment, making the dashboard and reporting more customizable, and offering a more accessible pricing model."

"It doesn't detect user activity like some of its competitors. It's not a vulnerability, but it's a legitimate activity that it doesn't detect. It only detects vulnerabilities or misconfigurations."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BetterCloud?

The real downside was it was a relatively expensive product, and ultimately we removed it as a cost-saving measure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BetterCloud?

BetterCloud's support for SaaS management was lacking initially, requiring development of a custom tool to handle some workflow automation. It was also relatively expensive. The account support tea...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BetterCloud?

We were using BetterCloud for onboarding and offboarding, particularly managing Google account setup and removal, because we wanted to retain information after people left, and not just have the ac...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs BetterCloud

Compared 20% of the time

Varonis Platform vs BetterCloud

Compared 19% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs BetterCloud

Compared 13% of the time

OpenIAM Identity Governance vs BetterCloud

Compared 8% of the time

Zylo vs BetterCloud

Compared 7% of the time

More BetterCloud Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SaaS Management Platforms

August 2026

Download BetterCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

August 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Overview

BetterCloud provides an extensive SaaS management platform dedicated to optimizing IT operations for efficient application oversight. It integrates automation, visibility, and security enhancements, making it a strategic choice for streamlined operations.

Focusing on cloud-based management, BetterCloud offers tools for administrators to control, secure, and streamline SaaS app services. By leveraging automation, it reduces manual tasks improving efficiency. It ensures comprehensive visibility across business applications, which is crucial for maintaining security and compliance. IT teams can achieve proactive prevention and quick resolution of potential security issues. This makes it a vital asset for reducing workloads and empowering IT staff to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are the most important features of BetterCloud?

SaaS Application Security: Safeguards data and enforces policies for app access.
Automated Workflow: Streamlines repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity.
Visibility and Control: Provides extensive insights into usage and configurations.
Policy Enforcement: Ensures compliance with IT regulations and standards.
Integrations: Seamlessly connects with numerous external applications for enhanced functionality.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in BetterCloud reviews?

Cost Savings: Optimizes resource allocation reducing operational costs.
Increased Efficiency: Automation leads to faster task completion and reduced manual errors.
Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring and policy management protect critical data.
IT Management Simplification: Consolidates multiple management tools into a single platform.
Faster Incident Response: Quick detection and resolution of security threats.

BetterCloud implementation spans industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, offering tailored controls and automation to suit sector-specific compliance and productivity demands. Each industry benefits from reduced risk exposure and enhanced operations, thanks to BetterCloud's adaptive capabilities.

BetterCloud

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

HelloFresh, Oscar Health, Square

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.