We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"It is a stable solution."
"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."
"The solution offers good documentation."
"Quorum OnQ has a good ransomware protection feature, and customer service and support were very good."
"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."
"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu."
"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
"They need integration with other platforms."
"It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The price is high and could be more competitive."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 3 reviews while Quorum OnQ is ranked 32nd in Backup and Recovery Software with 6 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 9.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "A scalable and easy-to-deploy solution that always works and provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "The backup and restoration process was very fast ". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, VMware SRM and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Commvault Complete Data Protection, Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Oracle Data Guard. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ report.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
