Azure Site Recovery vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
5,884 views|4,684 comparisons
Quorum Logo
2,026 views|1,057 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: November 2022).
654,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards.""The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products.""The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros →

"It is a stable solution.""One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration.""The solution offers good documentation.""Quorum OnQ has a good ransomware protection feature, and customer service and support were very good.""Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery.""The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."

More Quorum OnQ Pros →

Cons
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.""The immutable backup could be better.""The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons →

"Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu.""The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep.""They need integration with other platforms.""It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular.""The user interface needs to be improved.""The price is high and could be more competitive."

More Quorum OnQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."
  • "The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
  • More Quorum OnQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    654,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.
    Top Answer:It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
    Top Answer:It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that… more »
    Top Answer:Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery.
    Top Answer:My advice is to take a look at both the on-premises and cloud offerings from Quorum. We have been using an on-premises solution but we will probably evaluate the cloud version come renewal time.
    Top Answer:It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,884
    Comparisons
    4,684
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    261
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,026
    Comparisons
    1,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    619
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OnQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

    Offer
    Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
    Learn more about Quorum OnQ
    Sample Customers
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    LCL Bulk Transport
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Logistics Company20%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Healthcare Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business89%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    654,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Site Recovery is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 3 reviews while Quorum OnQ is ranked 32nd in Backup and Recovery Software with 6 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 9.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "A scalable and easy-to-deploy solution that always works and provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "The backup and restoration process was very fast ". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, VMware SRM and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Commvault Complete Data Protection, Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Oracle Data Guard. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ report.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.