We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Datto ALTO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"The backup for our virtual machines is reliable and the console makes management straightforward."
"It stayed the same for a long time, which makes it easy to set up and easy to work with."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"The process of restoring VMs to the appliance could be more efficient."
"Technical support was superior when it was owned independently."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while Datto ALTO is ranked 7th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Datto ALTO is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datto ALTO writes "Offers the flexibility to work with different vendors for cloud services, backup, and platform services". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud, whereas Datto ALTO is most compared with Datto SIRIS. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Datto ALTO report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
