Azure Firewall Manager vs Opinnate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,098 views|823 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Opinnate Logo
115 views|39 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Firewall Manager and Opinnate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.""It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser.""The tool's support is good.""The solution has improved our organization with its firewall.""The solution is very easy to set up."

More Azure Firewall Manager Pros →

"Version upgrades can be done quickly.""The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."

More Opinnate Pros →

Cons
"We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working.""There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera.""The price is okay. This said, the solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services.""The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall.""The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."

More Azure Firewall Manager Cons →

"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it.""PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."

More Opinnate Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."
  • More Azure Firewall Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Opinnate is inexpensive than other products."
  • More Opinnate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features.
    Top Answer:The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools.
    Top Answer:Version upgrades can be done quickly.
    Top Answer:Opinnate is inexpensive than other products. They offer yearly licenses.
    Top Answer:PDF format is not available for Alert Composer. There are file attachment or body content output options. The other issue is that the range object can be displayed in the rule viewer section. If we… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,098
    Comparisons
    823
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    231
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    115
    Comparisons
    39
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Eliminate boundaries in network security policy management. Analyze, optimize, automate & audit your security policies easily
    Opinnate‘s user-friendly UI allows you to redirect the effort gained through our system towards other security topics, rather than focusing on our solution itself.
    As opposed to incumbent technologies, the intelligent and lightweight Opinnate platform makes automated network security policy management attainable for enterprises of all sizes.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Doguş Teknoloji Bileşim A.S Tubitak Kamu SM Sompo Sigorta İsnet Yıldız Holding Arap Türk Bank ...
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Firewall Security Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Firewall Manager is ranked 13th in Firewall Security Management with 5 reviews while Opinnate is ranked 12th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews. Azure Firewall Manager is rated 7.8, while Opinnate is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Azure Firewall Manager writes "Useful testing, simple configuration, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". Azure Firewall Manager is most compared with Azure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks Panorama, AWS Firewall Manager, FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) and Tufin Orchestration Suite, whereas Opinnate is most compared with Tufin Orchestration Suite.

    See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

    We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.