We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"The agility is great for us in terms of cloud services in general."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"The product could be improved by expanding the weightage units of rules."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots"
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 51 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.2, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.