AWS Storage Gateway vs Nasuni comparison

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

7,412 Views
1,557 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Storage Gateway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Nasuni and AWS Storage Gateway compete in cloud storage solutions. Nasuni seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cost management and broader deployment flexibility.

Features: Nasuni offers global file locking, unlimited on-demand storage, and continuous file versioning, ensuring data consistency and easy collaboration. AWS Storage Gateway provides easy backup and restore functions, seamless data transfer, and integrates well with existing infrastructure, making it cost-efficient.

Room for Improvement: Nasuni could improve file replication speed, integration with platforms like OneDrive, and enhance user-friendliness and monitoring capabilities. AWS Storage Gateway could improve data access speed, ease of setup, and minimize pricing complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni supports deployment across hybrid, private, and public clouds, with positive feedback for its responsive support team, though there are occasional delays. AWS Storage Gateway provides good multi-cloud support with similar customer satisfaction, but Nasuni has a slight edge due to its broader support options.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni's licensing model covers storage and cloud services, offering cost-effectiveness and significant ROI through reduced infrastructure costs. AWS Storage Gateway offers reasonable pricing with a pay-as-you-go model, though users should be cautious of potential escalating costs. While both systems deliver good ROI, Nasuni's approach to cost management and subscription flexibility is often viewed as advantageous.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Storage Gateway vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: April 2026).

AWS Storage Gateway vs. Nasuni

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,830 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Storage Gateway

Ranking in Cloud Storage Gateways

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in Cloud Storage Gateways

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (2nd), NAS (10th), Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (13th), Cloud Backup (35th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Storage Gateways category, the mindshare of AWS Storage Gateway is 12.9%, up from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 22.6%, down from 41.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Gateways Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nasuni	22.6%
AWS Storage Gateway	12.9%
Other	64.5%

Cloud Storage Gateways

Featured Reviews

reviewer2056449

Sales Strategist at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Provides diverse tools for effective data management but can improve customer support practices

AWS Storage Gateway is very customer friendly in terms of their features, though perhaps not in price. If there is something that the customer needs to do with moving data from one point to another, they will make sure that is available to customers. At one time they had dozens of migration tools. They make it possible for data to get from anywhere to AWS Cloud, though not necessarily back. They will make it very easy and will do customer engagements to get that data from any legacy device to AWS. AWS Storage Gateway was born of all the cloud blank products, including Snowball, the big mobile unit. All of them were created to get more people to the AWS platform. In the past few years I have worked for data security software companies implementing customer solutions.

Read full review

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Storage Gateway is very customer friendly in terms of their features, though perhaps not in price."

"The solution has low latency."

"The stability is probably the most valuable aspect of the product."

"AWS Storage Gateway's best feature is its secure storage."

"It's an inexpensive, simple solution that is easily implemented for an existing backup environment."

"From my perspective, it's better than the traditional way of having a physical server."

"AWS Storage Gateway has durability."

"The solution's documentation is really good, and any information is easily accessible."

More AWS Storage Gateway pros

"The nice thing about Nasuni storage is that it is immutable. This means the data is only written once. So, you never modify the files. When you write a file out to the storage, it doesn't modify it when you change it. The technology knows how to figure out what the difference is between the original file write and what the changes are. Therefore, it only saves the changes."

"We like Nasuni's snapshot technology. The snapshot and recovery features are the things we use most frequently. Ideally, I would recommend NFS or CFS, which gives you more benefits for clients or anyone who wants to access FTP protocol, FTP utilities, SAN, and MSS."

"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery. We can fully recover a site in two hours."

"Nasuni has the capability of taking a snapshot every five minutes. If a user has accidentally deleted their data, we can recover it from the snapshot and provide the latest data to the user. It's a really great feature, one that is not provided by other vendors."

"Its dependability and auditing capabilities are very important to us to be able to maintain a chain of custody of the information."

"The ability to access anywhere, the ease of deployment, and the security are the most valuable features."

"The global file locking feature is valuable. The ability to quickly deploy new sites is also valuable."

"It has the ability to do end-user recovery, or a user can simply contact an admin who can perform a recovery from the management console. The versioning has simplified everything. Now we don't have to worry about those components."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"We've had issues with bandwidth in the past, and we don't know where the bottlenecks are."

"AWS Storage Gateway could improve by having different kinds of storage. For example, allowing all kinds of data, whether it's images or structure, not structure data."

"AWS Storage Gateway's cost can be an issue."

"AWS Storage Gateway could improve by having different kinds of storage. For example, allowing all kinds of data, whether it's images or structure, not structure data. This would be great."

"We've had issues with bandwidth in the past, and we don't know where the bottlenecks are. We're not sure if it's on the AWS side or with the clients or the configuration in between. There's no visibility."

"AWS Storage Gateway's cost can be an issue."

"The security could improve in the solution."

"Data migration and collection could be made easier for improvements - there's still work to be done there."

More AWS Storage Gateway cons

"Migration from existing systems, specifically StorSimple, could be improved, but that solution will be end-of-life by the end of the year. Also, the documentation could be more accessible."

"The speed at which new files are created is something that could be improved."

"Nasuni is not a stable solution."

"Nasuni could improve cloud integration and documentation of various ways we can leverage the product. It integrates with Azure, but the native Azure File Sync solution lets you divide data into tiers like hot, cool, and archived. Nasuni doesn't allow you to break the data apart into those tiered categories."

"We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover."

"When users from one office save their changes, their peers in another office can see the changes within minutes. Of course, this is an area for constant improvement and we hope that they can still reduce the amount of time it takes to replicate changes."

"Nasuni provides enough reporting to see what's happening. You can see the number of shares, total volume, issues, conflicts, etc., but it doesn't provide much visibility from a content perspective. For example, it doesn't tell you the data age. When you're trying to sort and filter information, the data creation date is a critical factor. Nasuni doesn't give you that. You can't get a count of all the file types, like the number of PDFs, Word docs, and PPT files."

"The only issue we face with Nasuni is from the performance perspective. Sometimes, when we deploy a Nasuni device, it doesn't meet our requirements. It's a capacity-planning issue."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"My company needs to get monthly licenses to use the tool."

"AWS Storage Gateway is reasonably priced. The price depends on how much you need. The whole synopse model comes into the picture for the cloud where it depends on how many instances per VM and the price will increase. It's a reasonable price because with all the competition around the price has to be competitive. It's not very costly."

"There is a monthly subscription for the use of this solution."

"We pay a monthly license."

"Licensing is paid monthly. Pricing is in the mid-range - not too high or too low."

"Nasuni should provide small-scale licenses, like a 20 TB license. Currently, the smallest is a 30 TB license."

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

"It's cheaper than a lot of alternatives but it's not cheap."

"Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

"I would not say it is economically priced, but it is affordable. If you can afford to pay for it, it is worth the money, but it is definitely not overpriced. It is priced about where it needs to be in the market. We were satisfied with the way they did their licensing and how they handled it. I believe they actually license by data size. It is based on how much data is being held on the machine and replicated, and that's completely understandable. So, for us, their pricing was as expected and affordable."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"The pricing is fair. It's an enterprise-level solution so it's not inexpensive... The cost is pretty stable year over year."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage Gateways solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,830 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Is AWS Storage Gateway only suitable for AWS?

No, I'm pretty sure you can't. This is a service of AWS and so you're probably only able to use it there. I haven't used any of the Amazon Web Services personally but from what I know, they usually...

Is AWS Storage Gateway easy to use?

Hi, yes, I think it is very easy to use. You can install it rather quickly, and then when you start using it, it's all explained to you on the native platform's website. I think the best thing abou...

Is AWS Storage Gateway free for users of AWS?

No, this service is not provided for free by AWS. If you visit the AWS website and you look for AWS Storage Gateway pricing, you'll be sent to a very helpful calculating page. There, based on what ...

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

NetApp AltaVault vs AWS Storage Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs AWS Storage Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

ClearSky Data vs AWS Storage Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Tiger Bridge vs AWS Storage Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

StorSimple vs AWS Storage Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Storage Gateway Competitors

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 9% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 6% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Qumulo vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs Nasuni

Compared 2% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS Storage Gateway product report

AWS Storage Gateway

May 2026

Download Nasuni product report

May 2026

Overview

AWS Storage Gateway offers affordable, flexible, and secure storage, allowing users to manage data efficiently without major changes to on-premises systems. Its key features include low latency and secure data transfers, supporting hybrid cloud strategies.

AWS Storage Gateway facilitates seamless integration of cloud storage with existing on-premises infrastructure. Its asynchronous server functionality and distributed data management ensure reliable and efficient data handling. The platform helps reduce data center management burdens and security risks by securely moving data to the cloud. Comprehensive documentation aids users in leveraging its capabilities effectively, though improvements in setup, integration, user interface, support, and pricing clarity are needed to enhance user experience.

What are the key features of AWS Storage Gateway?

Low Latency: Provides quick data access crucial for smooth operations.
Asynchronous Server Functionality: Manages data without disrupting ongoing tasks.
Distributed Data Management: Ensures efficient remote data handling.
Secure Storage: Delivers encrypted data transfer, ensuring security.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses associated with physical storage management.
Enhanced Security: Minimizes risks with secure, encrypted data transfer.
Operational Efficiency: Supports seamless cloud integration reducing on-premises infrastructure burden.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs efficiently.

Companies deploy AWS Storage Gateway for backup, archiving, and disaster recovery, accessing locally cached data rapidly while storing major datasets in the cloud. It aligns with hybrid cloud strategies, migrating data to Amazon AWS, ensuring secure, encrypted transfers from on-premises servers. This is particularly beneficial for financial systems, crypto exchanges, and general file storage.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

King, NEWLOG Consulting, Southern Oregon University, Religare Enterprises Limited, TGIX CloudCover, Moderna Therapeutics, JustGiving, VeriStor

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital