AWS Step Functions vs ProcessMaker comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9, while ProcessMaker is ranked #35. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 14 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,556 Views
1,891 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

720 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ProcessMaker and AWS Step Functions are both utilized for workflow automation. While ProcessMaker is known for simplicity and intuitive management, AWS Step Functions has the upper hand in comprehensive feature sets due to its robust integrations with AWS services.

Features: ProcessMaker is noted for its user-friendly workflow creation, customizability, and strong integration with third-party applications, making it accessible for non-technical users. AWS Step Functions offers adjustable service orchestration, seamless AWS Cloud resource integration, and support for complex task automation, addressing sophisticated automation needs and cloud capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ProcessMaker offers straightforward deployment suited for teams with limited technical expertise and emphasizes personalized customer service. AWS Step Functions, leveraging its cloud-first architecture, benefits from AWS's comprehensive support ecosystem, providing broader scalability and extensive integration support.

Pricing and ROI: ProcessMaker is recognized for its strong ROI, cost-effective pricing, and minimal setup costs, providing value through comprehensive features at a lower price. AWS Step Functions involves higher initial costs but aligns with organizations seeking deep infrastructure integration and long-term benefits, justifying the price with enhanced functionalities for extensive cloud operations.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (10th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 1.7%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Step Functions	1.7%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2706945

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Orchestration and integration simplify processes with seamless stability and reliability

I use the Visual Workflow Editor feature of AWS Step Functions. I mainly work through code and then improve it through the visual aspect. There are two ways to do orchestration: through code and through visual. My main task is to develop flows. I have only implemented AWS Step Functions with AWS services, not with any third-party tools. The integration between AWS Step Functions and other AWS services is excellent, working seamlessly with EventBridge, Glue jobs, and databases. I have not encountered any challenges with customers regarding AWS Step Functions that needed me to find a workaround. The pricing of AWS Step Functions is moderate and not particularly costly. AWS Step Functions is affordable for small, medium, and enterprise businesses as an orchestration tool. I have not used any documentation, manuals, or guides for AWS Step Functions as it's very simple to implement. When help is needed, I consult Stack Overflow or AI for commands. Overall rating for AWS Step Functions: 9 out of 10.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky."

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale."

"What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use."

"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services."

"The number of historical events is great."

"AWS Step Functions was stable, and there were no problems that I can recall."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

Cons

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"The solution's data size limit can be improved."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

"If AWS Step Functions keeps adding more integrations, it would be even better."

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

"There is room for improvement in terms of integration with other products. It would benefit from more integration with different applications or services."

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"One area for improvement is the payload size. Currently, I sometimes have to save data as a file since I cannot pass it within Step Functions, necessitating caching in processes."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

My customer's usual use cases for AWS Step Functions that I've been working with include orchestration, flows, diagram creation, and creating a flow for multiple Glue jobs to run a single pipeline.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 29% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 37% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs ProcessMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

January 2026

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

AWS Step Functions integrate seamlessly with other AWS services to offer efficient pipeline and workflow management. Its intuitive design allows for streamlined orchestration, easily handling complex tasks.

AWS Step Functions provide robust orchestration and automation capabilities, simplifying the creation of workflows with graphical and JSON-based designs. It excels in managing tasks through advanced parallelization and error handling features. Automatic scaling further enhances performance, ensuring reliability in varied environments. However, improvements are needed in IDE integration, larger data handling, and fault tolerance. Users find value in its capacity for microservice orchestration and data integration, although dependency on the Amazon ecosystem and limited third-party integrations pose challenges.

What are the key features of AWS Step Functions?

Integration with AWS Services: Facilitates seamless coordination with AWS offerings like Lambda and Glue.
Graphical and JSON-Based Design: User-friendly interfaces simplify workflow design and management.
Advanced Orchestration: Efficiently manages task execution with parallelization and error handling.
Automatic Scaling: Ensures optimal performance by adjusting resources as needed.
Microservice Integration: Supports smooth microservice communication and operation.

What benefits should organizations assess when considering AWS Step Functions?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates and streamlines task execution across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to workloads, providing flexibility in resource management.
Improved Workflow Management: Facilitates reliable and error-free operations.
Visualization and Automation: Simplifies complex processes with visual tools.
Data Validation and Script Execution: Integrates data operations smoothly within data lakes.

In industries managing data pipelines, AWS Step Functions orchestrate workflows, execute parallel ETL jobs, and integrate various AWS services, enabling smoother operations and efficient data migration. Companies benefit from streamlined processes and robust handling of interdependent tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.