AWS Step Functions vs ProcessMaker comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while ProcessMaker is ranked #35. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 10 AWS Step Functions reviews

3,180 Views
2,710 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

640 Views
460 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Step Functions and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,580 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (16th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 2.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Mahender Nirwan

Software developer at TAIGLE LLC

Aug 15, 2024

Good integration with many AWS services and create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features

I worked with Step Functions about a year ago for six months. Currently, I don't have any use cases for Step Functions. But overall, I was pretty amazed with it. It has great integration with many AWS services, and if you use it correctly, it could save you a ton of money. Again, it leverages AWS…

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Mar 22, 2022

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"If you want to create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features, it could save you a ton of money. That's for sure."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

"AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices."

"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale."

"The number of historical events is great."

"It is a scalable solution."

"What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good."

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"The solution's data size limit can be improved."

"The pricing of the solution can be improved."

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,580 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

I would rate my experience with this product a ten out of ten. Step Functions obviously cannot solve every problem statement. But it makes sense for a wide range of use cases. Everything has some l...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 44% of the time

IBM BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 6% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 6% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 53% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 20% of the time

Apache Airflow vs ProcessMaker

Compared 18% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

October 2024

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

September 2024

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

ProcessMaker

Overview

AWS Step Functions enables orchestration of complex workflows, parallel task execution, and seamless integration with AWS services, simplifying ETL automation and data pipeline management.

With AWS Step Functions, developers streamline task automation and ensure smooth microservices orchestration. It simplifies development and manages interdependencies, validates data, and integrates AWS services for cost-effective workflows. It offers a user-friendly graphical interface for creating pipelines, scalable parallelization via the "map" state, control over historical events, and visualization with JSON. Enhanced by a dashboard-like view, it aids in visual workflows and debugging.

What are the most valuable features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Easily integrates with the entire AWS suite for efficient workflow creation.
User-Friendly Graphical Interface: Simplifies creating and managing workflows with visual tools.
Scalable Parallelization: Utilizes the "map" state for efficient parallel processing tasks.
Control Historical Events: Manages and controls historical data and events effectively.
Visualization and Debugging: Provides a dashboard-like view to enhance understanding and debugging.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for?

Streamlined Development: Simplifies orchestration and automates task management.
Cost-Effective Workflows: Creates efficient, cost-saving workflows by integrating with AWS services.
Enhanced Data Validation: Ensures data correctness by managing interdependencies.
Automation of ETL Jobs: Automates data extraction, transformation, and loading processes seamlessly.

In specific industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, enterprises implement AWS Step Functions to manage data pipelines, orchestrate microservices, and automate complex ETL jobs. They benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, enhanced data validation, and streamlined development, resulting in efficient and cost-effective workflows tailored to their operational needs.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,580 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.