Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Shield vs Imperva Application Security Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Imperva are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Imperva is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Imperva’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Imperva users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Cloudflare
Read 78 Cloudflare reviews
  • 37,981 Views
  • 6,077 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
AWS Shield
Read 11 AWS Shield reviews
  • 2,117 Views
  • 2,117 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Imperva Application Securit...
Read 134 Imperva Application Security Platform reviews
  • 11,377 Views
  • 3,754 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Imperva Application Security Platform and AWS Shield both compete in the cybersecurity sector, specifically offering protection against web-based threats. Imperva appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and integration options, catering more comprehensively to security needs.

Features: Imperva offers features such as a Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS protection, real-time traffic analysis, and security intelligence. It provides extensive customization and integration capabilities. AWS Shield is valued for its ease of use and effective DDoS protection, making it simple to deploy in cloud environments. While useful, AWS lacks some of the advanced security features provided by Imperva.

Room for Improvement: Users recommend that Imperva enhance customer support, reporting features, and traffic analytics. There's also a call for more transparent licensing and UI improvements. AWS Shield could improve dashboard visibility and should consider offering more advanced features from the Shield Advanced in the standard version. Both platforms could benefit from better threat reporting and customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva offers various deployment options, including cloud and on-premises solutions, though on-premises setups can be complex. AWS Shield is praised for its straightforward integration within AWS environments. While customer service is generally positive for both platforms, Imperva's support receives mixed reviews on responsiveness, whereas AWS Shield is appreciated for reliable support and resource availability.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva is seen as more expensive, but its comprehensive features justify its cost, offering strong ROI in high-risk environments. Its pricing is flexible but potentially high for added features. AWS Shield offers a straightforward, scalable pricing model, especially beneficial for organizations deeply integrated within AWS. However, costs for advanced features can accumulate rapidly.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 883,044 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare
Sponsored
Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
CDN (1st), WAN Optimization (4th), Managed DNS (1st), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (10th)
AWS Shield
Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Imperva Application Securit...
Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
134
Ranking in other categories
CDN (3rd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (3rd), Bot Management (1st), API Security (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Cloudflare is 16.2%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Shield is 3.9%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imperva Application Security Platform is 8.5%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cloudflare16.2%
Imperva Application Security Platform8.5%
AWS Shield3.9%
Other71.4%
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
 

Featured Reviews

M.A. Faisal - PeerSpot reviewer
M.A. Faisal
General Manager at bKash Limited
Advanced protection has secured critical web workloads and provides clear traffic visibility
From a security perspective, there remains a security loophole, as some browsers in the market can bypass the Turnstile solution, which requires approximately 40 seconds to do so. From a performance perspective, this is acceptable. We also tried Google reCAPTCHA, and that can also be bypassed. From a security perspective, I would say neither solution is completely secured. Regarding uptime, we have faced a couple of incidents due to Cloudflare in recent years, so I cannot say we receive 100% uptime for our region. We sometimes face challenges, including downtime and other issues. As a result, we are not receiving 100% uptime from Cloudflare's solution. Since most of our customers are in this region, we need alternatives. We need something more competitive than Cloudflare. Unfortunately, in Bangladesh, Cloudflare has three points of presence already, and we cannot find any other solution provider in Bangladesh as an alternative, which presents another challenge. Competitor solutions have more attack signatures, which ensure better security compared to Cloudflare's predefined configurations. Customers do not have options to modify any configuration parameters in Cloudflare, whereas other competitor solutions, such as F5 Distributed Cloud, allow customers to tune configurations according to their requirements. Cloudflare could improve in this area. Additionally, regarding visibility, Cloudflare has static visibility, but they could adopt dynamic graph features for their customers.
Read full review
reviewer2767527 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2767527
Lead Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has enabled multi-layered threat mitigation but still lacks deeper visibility for advanced application attacks
AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods. It does not provide inherent protection against more sophisticated layer 7 attacks such as HTTP floods. In such cases, integration with WAF is necessary, which results in additional costs for customers. To protect layer 7, layer 4, and layer 3, customers must implement both solutions. The service also has difficulties with static detection thresholds, which may not be sensitive enough to detect smaller application-specific attacks. While AWS Shield is a key security service, AWS should enhance their expert support with 24/7 response for complex attacks, which is currently limited.
Read full review
reviewer1247523 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1247523
Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Solution ensures website availability and proactive threat mitigation
Over the seven years, the most valuable features of Imperva DDoS that I have found are related to DDoS attacks, which are a group of attacks, and not all of them can be resolved on the endpoint level before the website. Using the web firewall before the website is a common use case to protect against malicious requests to the website. I have utilized Imperva's Intelligent Traffic Filtering feature. This feature helps me understand how the attack is progressing and what is happening inside the requests to our website. It allows me to granularly grant or deny access to certain parts of our website. This helps when we know our customers and the types of requests that can be sent from them, enabling us to block some malicious requests. Imperva DDoS has User Behavior Analytics and Threat Intelligence on its board, and this helps us to be protected proactively. Imperva DDoS connects to its database of threats, storing whole information about attacks all over the world in one simple engine. Everyone can use this feature, which can connect to this engine and get information about what is going on at the world level. That is the way to be protected at the company's level. The integration capabilities of Imperva DDoS are very easy and simple. We can run it in 2 hours.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I get a lot of value from Cloudflare's API because it enables you to build a separate environment inside the solution. You can create a domain for performing test requests before you move to the production environment and connect various domains."
"New and innovative way to protect the client's data."
"Cloudflare makes it easier for me to handle and set up DNS for multiple users and multiple clients, and basically go in and access their account, make the changes they need, and it's a one-stop shop."
"Even when there is a high load on our servers, Cloudflare is able to cache the data and serve it to users, ensuring they can still access the website."
"The most valuable feature is its usability."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare is that it has a free version. They give us the free version with the anti-DDoS features and also the load balancing solution."
"The solution automatically detects and responds to certain types of traffic based on geolocation."
"When using services like Heroku, Cloudflare is very useful for CNAME flattening. I also use it for their end-to-end SSL with TLS authentication on nginx for securing servers."
More Cloudflare pros
"The solution operates smoothly at its baseline level, and we do not encounter any issues at that level."
"AWS Shield offers numerous protection features that are crucial at the application layer, safeguarding users from distributed denial of service attacks, man-in-the-middle assaults, and hacker orchestrations."
"It is quite scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability."
"The solution's ease of use is the most valuable feature."
"It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."
"The product is easy to use."
"The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."
"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."
More AWS Shield pros
"The solution integrates seamlessly with other tools and has a good alert mechanism."
"Configuration for different application sources is most valuable. We can segregate the traffic that an application is carrying and identify the sizing in Imperva."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is a highly stable solution and is very mature."
"The most important feature I have found to be the ease in how to do the backup and restores."
"Protection is the best solution since it has profile functionality."
"The dynamic profiling of websites is the solution's most valuable feature. The security is also good."
"I have had a positive experience with Imperva Web Application Firewall's tech support so far. They are knowledgeable and respond on time."
"There are quite a few useful Imperva Incapsula features. For example, one of them is the reports. The graphics are very good and it's easy to configure. The whole process is very fast and reliable too. They have good tech support as well."
More Imperva Application Security Platform pros
 

Cons

"The analytics, basically the dashboard, doesn't have much to it."
"The tool needs to improve caching of servers. The product needs to include PFX certificate as well."
"The integration of LLMs on the dashboard is something that is needed in the tool."
"DNS Management."
"Support response time could be improved."
"Cloudflare does not have an on-premise solution. If they had different approaches they could be better suited to accommodate more customers, such as on-premise and hybrid deployments. For example, hybrid deployments would be useful where you could move the traffic from the enterprise to the cloud."
"Cloudflare's free plan is limited to 5,000 records for their free plan. They should increase that. For example, if I create a domain called abc.com and a subdomain called a.abc.com, my record count will be two. I can make a maximum of 5,000 subdomains. However, if we use our own DNS hosted on another provider, there is no limit. Their free plan also lacks name server customization."
"For large enterprises, the pricing is okay. However, the enterprise price for small projects is a bit high. A mid-tier pricing option would be beneficial."
More Cloudflare cons
"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better."
"We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need."
"AWS Shield Standard requires improvement, particularly regarding its dashboard since it currently provides limited coverage against comprehensive DDoS attacks."
"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced. Presently, it takes some time to determine whether a situation is normal or abnormal."
"Perhaps the time required to detect anomalies can be reduced."
"AWS Shield has limited coverage as it only protects against common and high-volume network and transport layer attacks, such as SYN floods."
"The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team."
"The time taken to detect anomalies must be reduced."
More AWS Shield cons
"It would be nice to have more security control over mobile applications so I would suggest adding more mobile security features. It would also be beneficial to see improvements in regards to interface bandwidth performance, CPU time, and RAM size. Learning capability of the device is quite weak."
"It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself."
"I think that better bot protection is needed in this solution."
"There's always room for improvement. Occasionally, there might be false-positive alerts."
"The solution works for particular zones but isn't always the best solution for all zones."
"It should be more user-friendly. Like other web solutions, it would be helpful to be able to easily do policy configuration and identification inside the application. Understanding the in-depth configuration of a policy is somewhat difficult for an engineer, and they can improve that."
"The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall could improve the API integration. It was complex for us. Additionally, The onboarding could be better."
More Imperva Application Security Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare's pricing is not much higher and is good for middle-level organizations."
"It's a premium model. You can start at zero and work your way up to the enterprise model, which has a very high pricing level."
"I believe their performance has improved, but I'd like to refrain from discussing the pricing aspect related to the cloud. The pricing, in my opinion, could be simplified, and I think they should consider reevaluating the pricing for support, as it can be quite high. At times, this cost can make it challenging to choose CARFAGuard or opt for the support."
"The cost primarily depends on the size of the organization."
"We are using the free tier of the solution."
"The pricing depends on the usage, but the cheapest would be around 5,000 USD a month."
"For Cloudflare, I recommend it heavily for small businesses with revenue under a couple of million dollars. Onboarding is easy, and they even have a free plan. This makes it simple for businesses in the $100,000-$500,000 range to try it out and see its value, allowing them to scale up their infrastructure as needed."
"When you compare Cloudflare DNS to other solutions, such as Akamai, the price is reasonable."
More Cloudflare pricing and cost advice
"The tool's pricing is good."
"It depends on your subscription level and the volume that you're spending with AWS. So, it is very relative to the consumption alignment in your subscription level. It is a well-constructed, scalable pricing option, but it is relative to how much you're spending on AWS. Because the more you spend, typically, the more you get off on services like this. I find it to be comparable to other solutions."
"We pay $3000 per month for the solution."
"The tool is cheap."
"The cost depends on traffic each month, so on average, it costs us between US$200 and US$300 per month."
"There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
"The cost of this solution depends on the platform."
"The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."
"The price is high compared to other solutions like FortiWeb."
"The pricing is somewhat expensive. It is actually a huge investment when compared to other countries."
"It is not expensive compared to the other similar solutions in this category."
"Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately."
"The data packages are higher than our needs so we end up paying for data that we don't use."
More Imperva Application Security Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user68487 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user68487
Security Expert with 51-200 employees
Nov 6, 2013
CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Web Application Firewall
CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Round 2 Web Application Firewall Comparative Penetration Testing Analysis Report v1.0 Summary This document contains the results of a second comparative penetration test conducted by a team of security specialists at Zero Science Lab against two cloud-based Web…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business46
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business84
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Cloudflare. We are moving from Akamai prolexic to Cloudflare. Cloudflare anycast network outperforms Akamai static GR...
See all answers
Which would you choose - Cloudflare DNS or Quad9?
Cloudflare DNS is a very fast, very reliable public DNS resolver. It is an enterprise-grade authoritative DNS service...
See all answers
What do you like most about Cloudflare?
Cloudflare offers CDN and DDoS protection. We have the front end, API, and database in how you structure applications.
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS Shield?
We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't de...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Shield?
The pricing structure for AWS Shield is fair, yet it depends on the specific protections chosen. Enabling Shield Adva...
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Shield?
Services always benefit from improvements, including AWS Shield. With respect to the Web Application Firewall, curren...
See all answers
Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot mana...
See all answers
What do you like most about Imperva Incapsula?
We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Quad9 vs Cloudflare Logo
Quad9 vs Cloudflare
Compared 47% of the time
Akamai vs Cloudflare Logo
Akamai vs Cloudflare
Compared 4% of the time
Azure Front Door vs Cloudflare Logo
Azure Front Door vs Cloudflare
Compared 2% of the time
Myra Security DDoS Protection vs Cloudflare Logo
Myra Security DDoS Protection vs Cloudflare
Compared 2% of the time
Azure DNS vs Cloudflare Logo
Azure DNS vs Cloudflare
Compared 2% of the time
More Cloudflare Competitors
Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield Logo
Azure DDoS Protection vs AWS Shield
Compared 16% of the time
Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield Logo
Cloudflare One vs AWS Shield
Compared 14% of the time
Radware DDoS vs AWS Shield Logo
Radware DDoS vs AWS Shield
Compared 11% of the time
Prolexic vs AWS Shield Logo
Prolexic vs AWS Shield
Compared 6% of the time
Akamai App and API Protector vs AWS Shield Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs AWS Shield
Compared 6% of the time
More AWS Shield Competitors
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform Logo
Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
F5 Advanced WAF vs Imperva Application Security Platform Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Imperva Application Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
AWS WAF vs Imperva Application Security Platform Logo
AWS WAF vs Imperva Application Security Platform
Compared 3% of the time
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Imperva Application Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Imperva Application Security Platform
Compared 3% of the time
More Imperva Application Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare
February 2026
Cloudflare reportDownload Cloudflare product report
Buyer's Guide
AWS Shield
February 2026
AWS Shield reportDownload AWS Shield product report
Buyer's Guide
Imperva Application Security Platform
February 2026
Imperva Application Security Platform reportDownload Imperva Application Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare DNS
No data available
Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security
 

Overview

Cloudflare enhances web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DDoS mitigation while providing easy DNS management and intuitive setup through its user-friendly dashboard.

Cloudflare is recognized for its comprehensive web security and performance solutions. Speed improvements are achieved through caching mechanisms and DDoS protection, combining ease of DNS management with flexible page rules. The robust analytics and threat insight tools provide valuable data, assisted by a user-friendly dashboard allowing quick setup and configuration. An API offers dynamic DNS settings ensuring low latency and high performance across the globe.

What are Cloudflare's key features?
  • CDN Caching: Enhances website speed through content delivery network caching.
  • Web Application Firewall: Protects websites from online threats.
  • DDoS Mitigation: Shields against distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • DNS Management: Offers easy-to-use and flexible domain management.
  • SSL Certificates: Ensures secure connections between users and servers.
  • Analytics: Provides insights with robust analytics tools.
What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?
  • Enhanced Security: Strengthening web security with DDoS and firewall protection.
  • Speed Improvement: Faster content delivery with CDN caching.
  • Operational Simplicity: Simplifies website optimization through a user-friendly interface.
  • Scalable Solutions: Scales with global reach, lowering latency for improved performance.
  • Cost Efficiency: Offers layers of valuable functionality with pricing options.

Cloudflare finds utility across industries for DNS management and defense mechanisms. Its content delivery network assures fast content distribution and fortified security. Businesses integrate features like web application firewalls, load balancing, end-to-end SSL, and zero trust to protect websites from cyber threats while ensuring resilience and reliable performance.

Cloudflare

AWS Shield is a managed Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection service that safeguards applications running on AWS. AWS Shield provides always-on detection and automatic inline mitigations that minimize application downtime and latency, so there is no need to engage AWS Support to benefit from DDoS protection.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.

Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.

What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?
  • Correlated Attack Validation: Enhances threat assessment by linking related security events.
  • Threat Radar: Offers visibility into potential and ongoing threats.
  • Virtual Patching: Provides protection against vulnerabilities without immediate code changes.
  • IncapRules: Allows creation of custom security policies.
  • DDoS Protection: Defends against large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • CDN Integration: Improves content delivery speed and reliability.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • User-Friendly Administration: Simplifies setup and ongoing management tasks.
  • Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation with existing infrastructure.
  • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Shields digital assets from a wide range of threats.
  • Hands-On Support: Provides timely and effective customer service assistance.

Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.

Imperva
 

Sample Customers

Trusted by over 9,000,000 Internet Applications and APIs, including Nasdaq, Zendesk, Crunchbase, Steve Madden, OkCupid, Cisco, Quizlet, Discord and more.
netflix, dow jones, mapbox, pearson, rovio, youview, moviestar planet, asurion, payplug, hour of code
Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.
Buyer's Guide
AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform
February 2026
Free Report: AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Shield vs. Imperva Application Security Platform report.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.