AWS Security Hub vs LogRhythm SIEM comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Exabeam solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. Exabeam is ranked #11 in SIEM , with an average rating of 7.4, and holds a 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

8,338 Views
3,585 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

LogRhythm SIEM

Read 176 LogRhythm SIEM reviews

10,673 Views
6,937 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

LogRhythm SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

LogRhythm SIEM and AWS Security Hub are two prominent solutions in security information and event management, each with unique strengths. AWS Security Hub seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless AWS ecosystem integration, simplicity, and scalability.

Features: LogRhythm SIEM offers advanced threat detection, response automation, and comprehensive log management. AWS Security Hub provides seamless AWS integration, consolidated security alerts, and compliance checks.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm SIEM users report a need for improved scalability, a more streamlined setup process, and easier report customization. AWS Security Hub users wish for enhanced multi-cloud support, more elaborate third-party integrations, and more advanced threat analysis features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm SIEM deployment is complex, with some users needing professional assistance, but its customer service is highly responsive and knowledgeable. AWS Security Hub offers a straightforward deployment experience, and customer service is well-regarded but less personalized.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm SIEM's setup costs are higher, but users find the investment justified by its advanced capabilities and return on investment. AWS Security Hub is more cost-effective, particularly for businesses already using AWS services, with a quicker perceived ROI due to lower initial costs and efficient integration.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (11th)

LogRhythm SIEM

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (13th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, down 4.4% compared to last year.
LogRhythm SIEM, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 2.5% mindshare, down 3.1% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.0%
Wiz	12.6%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	8.6%
Other	75.8%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LogRhythm SIEM	2.5%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.0%
IBM Security QRadar	5.2%
Other	85.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

SaiKrishna2

Cyber Security Engineer at Diyar United Company

Provides strong detection capabilities but requires improvements in parsing and stability

I cannot think of any specific features that LogRhythm SIEM can improve upon since it supports a wide variety of major vendors. However, they need to improve their parsing techniques; the tool should understand various devices and present data in a human-readable format. For example, if a personal Android mobile needs to be integrated, LogRhythm SIEM should be able to parse that data effectively. They also need to improve their database of supported devices to cover smaller vendors alongside the major players, allowing for better global reach and usability. I have noticed some problems with parsing errors, event mismatches, and data mismatching, so ensuring accurate parsing and continuous improvement according to device updates are my basic expectations as a detection engineer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate Security Hub ten out of ten for stability."

"Easily integrates with third-party tools"

"The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate."

"AWS Security Hub's unified dashboard does help streamline my process of identifying vulnerabilities, but we don't use Inspector."

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."

"AWS Security Hub brings many features into one table that is quite useful, and the app team finds it easier to see what is missing."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud."

"AWS Security Hub can check your infrastructure against multiple compliance frameworks. You can turn on or off specific frameworks based on your needs."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"The user interface is pretty good compared to other SIEM tools."

"I would definitely recommend LogRhythm, based on my experience with it."

"LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is customizable, simple to manage, and there are many features. The solution does not require an expert to be able to use it, anyone can use it."

"The LogRhythm support system is phenomenal."

"The web interface is awesome, it's very intuitive and gives a lot of great information."

"You can request support and they respond immediately."

"It has definitely improved our security program's maturity, because we have visibility that we didn't have before."

"SOAR is integrated with the dashboard that we use for threat management, and because it's all integrated, it is useful for us when we deploy something on-prem."

More LogRhythm SIEM pros

Cons

"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."

"The user interface, graphs, and dashboards of the solution could improve in the future. They are not very sophisticated and could use an update."

"AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities. It would be beneficial for Security Hub to implement preventative measures and to directly apply recommendations instead of just suggesting them."

"Many findings are too generic or irrelevant to the environment, which can lead to false positives."

"The support must be quicker."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities."

"Right now, there are some difficulties we're facing with AWS Security Hub, and we need our central team to mitigate the issues."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"It seems with all of the advanced features that we haven't quite figured them out. It is very complex."

"The log storage capacity should be increased."

"I would like to see our vulnerabilities counter. We will be using Tenable to fill that void right now."

"Stability has probably been one area where Health Checks have not been great with the product, though we do struggle with them on a daily basis."

"I would like to see more integration with more products that are out there within the same security field."

"Technical support could use a little work in the terms of responding back."

"We have a lot of issues with stability."

"My big thing is the easability. I don't like to go to two different systems."

More LogRhythm SIEM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The solution has provided us with consistency and increased staff productivity through orchestrated automated work flows by at least 20 percent."

"We did a five-year agreement. We pay close to a quarter of a million dollars for our solution."

"The product is inexpensive than other tools."

"The license cost is around $10 per MPS."

"I have seen a measurable decrease in the mean time to detect and respond to threats. We went from not detecting them to detecting them. We can actually pick up what is anomalous in our network now."

"In the context of our country, the price of this solution is too high."

"I think the tool is reasonably priced. There is a need to pay per year towards the licensing costs of the tool."

"It is a very cost-effective solution."

More LogRhythm SIEM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	83

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Security Hub?

The major use case for identifying misconfigurations within the AWS environment focuses on determining whether the administrators have configured everything correctly, giving a better picture of AW...

See all answers

What is the difference between log management and SIEM?

Rony, Daniel's answer is right on the money. There are many solutions for each in the market, a lot depends upon your ability to manage such tools and your budget. A small operation may be best s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM?

LogRhythm SIEM could learn from Wazuh, as Wazuh has a built-in mechanism that allows you to write custom scripting and scripts through languages that Wazuh can then trigger, which is somewhat bette...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm SIEM?

I find LogRhythm SIEM affordable, as it is a bit less costly than QRadar, although I have not been involved in negotiation charges; however, from the manager's approval, I see it as affordable.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 32% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 7% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs LogRhythm SIEM

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs LogRhythm SIEM

Compared 4% of the time

Devo vs LogRhythm SIEM

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Security vs LogRhythm SIEM

Compared 3% of the time

More LogRhythm SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

April 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm SIEM

April 2026

Download LogRhythm SIEM product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, LogRhythm, LogRhythm Threat Lifecycle Management, LogRhythm TLM

Overview

AWS Security Hub provides multi-account management and compliance checks alongside integrations with AWS services and third-party tools. It centralizes vulnerability tracking and risk prioritization, delivering real-time alerts for proactive security management.

AWS Security Hub enhances cloud security management through a centralized dashboard that monitors infrastructure resources and compliance scores, ensuring adherence to AWS standards. With integrations for vulnerability detection and security posture management, users can streamline security operations. While the platform offers notable benefits, areas for improvement include customization options for findings suppression and integration with multi-cloud environments.

What are the key features of AWS Security Hub?

Multi-Account Management: Seamlessly manage security across numerous accounts.
Compliance Checks: Stay aligned with standards such as PCI through automated reviews.
AWS Integrations: Connect effortlessly with AWS and third-party services to enhance security posture.
Real-Time Alerts: Quickly respond to potential threats with immediate notifications.
Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities to enhance resource allocation.

What benefits should users expect from using AWS Security Hub?

Proactive Security: Early threat detection enables quicker mitigation strategies.
Cloud-Native Functionality: Utilize tools tailored for cloud environments.
Compliance Insights: Simplified compliance management provides transparency.
Ease of Use: Streamlined interface facilitates efficient security management.

Industries implementing AWS Security Hub leverage its capabilities for comprehensive security across multiple accounts and regions. Health, finance, and retail sectors benefit by automating compliance checks and monitoring security infrastructures. This service aids in identifying misconfigurations, tracking alerts, and ensuring infrastructure integrity during cyber incidents.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

LogRhythm SIEM offers advanced threat intelligence, scalable deployment, and streamlined log management. It enhances security posture with AI-driven threat detection and comprehensive monitoring.

LogRhythm SIEM stands out for its AI-driven threat correlation, ease of log aggregation, and robust reporting. Offering real-time visibility and analytics through consistent navigation and dashboards, it integrates with security components for enhanced monitoring and response. Advanced threat intelligence and customizable alerts streamline processes and bolster security. While it faces challenges with log parsing, reporting, and dashboard intuitiveness, plans to enhance cloud integration and transition to Linux are noted.

What are the standout features?

AI Threat Correlation: Employs AI to correlate threats for efficient detection.
Log Aggregation: Simplifies the collection of logs from multiple sources.
Scalable Deployment: Offers flexible scaling to accommodate growth.
Robust Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decisions.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Engages cutting-edge techniques to assess threats.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced threat detection and response.
Streamlined Processes: Automation leads to efficiency gains.
Comprehensive Compliance: Facilitates adherence to regulatory standards.
Centralized Log Management: Unified log overview aids in quick insights.

In industries like banking and finance, organizations utilize LogRhythm SIEM for centralized log management, security monitoring, and compliance. It helps detect insider threats, analyze server logs, correlate events, and monitor user behaviors. Appreciated for log ingestion and anomaly identification, it ensures robust cybersecurity and incident response by integrating data from multiple sources.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

Macy's, NASA, Fujitsu, US Air Force, EY, Abbott, HD Supply, SAB Miller, UCLA, Raytheon, Amtrak, Cargill

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. LogRhythm SIEM report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.