We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: For users vested in the AWS ecosystem, AWS is hands down the best choice. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is flexible and allows users to decide how to distribute their IPUs in their own networks. Data residency laws make it challenging to choose this solution, as their regions are currently very limited.
"I also like that you can add custom libraries like JAR files and use them. So, the ability to use a fast processing engine and embed basic jobs easily are significant advantages."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"It's fairly straightforward as a product; it's not very complicated."
"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."
"We have found it beneficial when moving data from one source to another."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"The most valuable feature is the building of mockups and tasks."
"The most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Integration for our clients are the AI capabilities within Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"We have a lot of integrations, and it's very easy to create integrations. They have a lot of connectors."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The support is very good."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"The setup and installation is a bit complex without advanced knowledge or training."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"Only people who can code, either in Java or Python, can use the product freely. Those who don't know Java or Python might find using AWS Glue difficult."
"One area that could be improved is the ETL view. The drag-and-drop interface is not as user-friendly as some other ETL tools."
"The mapping area and the use of the data catalog from Glue could be better."
"While working on AWS Glue, I could not find any training material for it."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"I would like to see more functionality added so that it is a bit closer to how much you can do with Informatica PowerCenter."
"With the solution, we had some issues, and we have every day, and we used to open a ticket. Sometimes, there are data issues and transformation issues."
"Cost-wise, it could be better."
"Error reporting and debugging need improvement."
"One area where Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve is in providing more accelerators for certain functionalities."
"One area that needs to improve is the user experience because it is very complex. The trial version is very complex so it's not easy to start using the program immediately. You must study the rules first."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
"The cloud version of the Informatica, it's a very substandard product. They might say it's enterprise-ready but it's not at all ready. They need to add more features, such as improved data replication features. If you look at other tools, such as Matillion they are now cloud-native and flexible. Additionally, Informatica Cloud Data Integration should have a good migration strategy from Informatica PowerCenter to Informatica Cloud Data Integration."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Talend Open Studio and Confluent, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, Fivetran, Mule Anypoint Platform and Matillion ETL. See our AWS Glue vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.