AWS Control Tower vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,087 views|730 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Kovai.co Logo
26 views|10 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Control Tower vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Security is the most valuable feature of Control Tower.""It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies.""AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts.""Compliance is the most valuable feature.""It provides a central point for account management, access control, and compliance monitoring.""AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs.""One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges.""It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."

More AWS Control Tower Pros →

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us.""It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower.""The solution's stability could be improved.""By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved.""It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly.""The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations.""The initial setup is complex.""While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better.""It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."

More AWS Control Tower Cons →

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use.""Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is free."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."
  • "The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."
  • "It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."
  • "AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."
  • "The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."
  • "The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."
  • "It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."
  • More AWS Control Tower Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on… more »
    Top Answer:I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their… more »
    Top Answer:There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background… more »
    Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
    Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    1,087
    Comparisons
    730
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.3
    29th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    26
    Comparisons
    10
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Serverless360
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

    Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

    Our Core features:

    1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
    2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
    3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
    4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
    5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
      Sample Customers
      Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
      MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm16%
      Computer Software Company15%
      Educational Organization9%
      Government8%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company39%
      Manufacturing Company15%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Real Estate/Law Firm5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business60%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise27%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business20%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise64%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise7%
      Large Enterprise57%
      Buyer's Guide
      AWS Control Tower vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation and Morpheus, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our AWS Control Tower vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

      See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.