AWS Application Migration Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while NetApp is ranked #24. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.1% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

AWS Application Migration S...

Read 8 AWS Application Migration Service reviews

1,450 Views
1,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

1,952 Views
586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Application Migration S...

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

AWS Application Migration Service and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud compete in the cloud solutions category, each with distinct advantages. Data comparisons suggest AWS has the upper hand in pricing and customer service while NetApp stands out with enhanced features.

Features: AWS Application Migration Service focuses on seamless and automated application migration, reducing time and effort. It ensures efficient transitions while maintaining system integrity. Additionally, its cost-effectiveness provides a clear advantage for budget-conscious enterprises. On the other hand, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service delivers significant storage capabilities, exceptional scalability, and advanced data management. Its robust data handling and flexibility make it ideal for businesses requiring extensive storage solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Application Migration Service is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, making the setup smooth and accessible. In contrast, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service provides specialized guidance during complex data migration operations, offering specialized deployment assistance and management support, which is beneficial for handling complex data scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Application Migration Service offers competitive pricing with a focus on cost-effectiveness, leading to attractive ROI through low setup costs and efficient migrations. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service, while having higher initial costs, offers superior storage features and scalability, resulting in a strong ROI for businesses prioritizing long-term data management solutions. The distinct mark here is AWS's affordability against NetApp's value-driven approach through enhanced data storage capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

24th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (19th), Public Cloud Storage Services (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of AWS Application Migration Service is 4.1%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 2.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Application Migration Service	4.1%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud	2.6%
Other	93.3%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Terence Dube

AWS Cloud Engineer at Standard Telephones and Cables

Automation has simplified migrations and now needs to address complex legacy compatibility

The features I like the most about AWS Application Migration Service is its ease of use. That's the main thing. It's ease of use, and they have a detailed walkthrough, especially depending on different operating systems. The automation capabilities of AWS actually eliminate the long time and input that I have to put into migration. These days, I just run the agent, and then the agent does the job. All I have to do is actually look at the current migration status on the AWS dashboard. When it's done, I then do a quick switch over to the cloud. The key thing I really love is the simple moving of files from on-prem to the cloud.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"CloudEndure is a product that I recommend to my customers because it's very easy to implement, configure, and use."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The installation process and configuration processes are very straightforward, and in terms of maintenance, it's pretty easy as one person can handle it."

"The features I like the most about AWS Application Migration Service is its ease of use, and they have a detailed walkthrough, especially depending on different operating systems, while the automation capabilities eliminate the long time and input that I have to put into migration."

More AWS Application Migration Service pros

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."

"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."

Cons

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"However, I give it a six mainly due to the compatibility issues with legacy systems, which is an individual problem I am currently facing."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"The user interface has room for improvement."

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"Live Migration's price is good."

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

I've never really looked at AWS Application Migration Service in a way of improving. There's always room for improvement, but I think we can improve the automation. It's already automated, but some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

I use AWS Application Migration Service to install application servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The main challenge I faced during migration was actually doing the migration itself. At first, I had to find a way to move or replicate the information to the cloud, which was way too manual. I thi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 23% of the time

Hexaware Amaze vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 17% of the time

Racemi Cloud Path vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 13% of the time

Velostrata vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 12% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service

August 2026

AWS Application Migration Service report

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service offers a streamlined approach for moving workloads to the cloud by providing live migration capabilities with minimal downtime. Its user-friendly design and seamless integration with AWS services enable efficient transitions while supporting diverse workloads and database migrations.

AWS Application Migration Service is valued for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, offering live block-to-block replication to ensure data reliability. It assists in converting schemas to support database migrations and allows phased migrations with ease. Users benefit from its scalability and the ability to handle large-scale server transfers and application migrations, such as SAP and Salesforce, alongside supporting multi-region replication for distributed architectures and analytics. The service integrates well with AWS tools, simplifying cloud transitions and providing robust support for disaster recovery and cloud-to-cloud migrations.

What are the most important features of AWS Application Migration Service?

Live Migration: Enables continuous data replication with minimal downtime.
Database Migration Support: Converts schemas for smooth database transitions.
Scalability: Handles a wide range of applications and large-scale transfers.
Integration with AWS: Seamless connection with AWS services for streamlined operations.

What benefits do reviews highlight?

User-Friendliness: Simplified processes helpful for all users.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reasonable pricing structure with optimized usage cases.
Data Reliability: Block-to-block replication ensures high data integrity.
Scalability: Supports diverse workloads and large-scale migrations.

Industries utilizing AWS Application Migration Service benefit from its ability to migrate data from on-premises setups to the cloud, facilitating the movement of heavy-duty applications like SAP and Salesforce. Its support for multi-region replication aids businesses in setting up distributed architectures, while its compatibility with analytics platforms like Redshift and S3 ensures efficient data handling and integration for broader business intelligence needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides a managed, high-performance storage solution designed for enterprise workloads and complex data environments, ensuring seamless integration with Google Cloud.

It offers enterprises an efficient way to manage storage needs in Google Cloud, with features focused on high performance, ease of use, and robust data management. This service facilitates quick deployment, reliability, and data protection, allowing organizations to focus on operational efficiency without the complexities of traditional infrastructure.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent, scalable performance for demanding applications.
Ease of Use: Simplified management and deployment reduce administrative overhead.
Data Protection: Includes built-in snapshots and replication for data integrity and disaster recovery.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services for streamlined workflows.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth, providing storage on demand.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Optimizes storage costs with automated tiering and flexible pricing models.
Enhanced Productivity: Reduces time spent on storage management, allowing teams to focus on core tasks.
Reliability: Provides a dependable infrastructure with high uptime and data availability.
Agility: Enables rapid adaptation to changing business needs with quick scalability.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is implemented to ensure secure data handling and regulatory compliance. Its capabilities in data protection and rapid scaling are particularly valuable in these sectors, where data integrity and fast access are priorities.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Application Migration Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.