AWS Amplify vs Spinnaker comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Spinnaker are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.0, while Spinnaker is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in RA, compared to Spinnaker’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Spinnaker users who would recommend it.

AWS Amplify

Read 7 AWS Amplify reviews

1,444 Views
727 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Spinnaker

Read 4 Spinnaker reviews

348 Views
201 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

AWS Amplify

Spinnaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

In application management, AWS Amplify and Spinnaker serve different functions. AWS Amplify excels in streamlining app development and integration with AWS services, while Spinnaker dominates in handling continuous delivery across multiple clouds.

Features: AWS Amplify enhances development with GraphQL APIs, seamless AWS service integration, and robust authentication. It caters to front-end developers aiming for minimal backend coding. Spinnaker offers intricate workflows across diverse cloud platforms, pluggable cloud drivers, and efficient rollback capabilities via a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: AWS Amplify could enhance support for more backend customization and expand integration options beyond AWS. It can also improve initial service setup time. Spinnaker might benefit from reducing configuration complexity and increasing user-friendly documentation. Streamlining its integration with newer cloud services and enhancing graphical interfaces could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Amplify offers an intuitive deployment process and comprehensive AWS documentation, providing extensive support. Spinnaker requires more detailed configuration, which can be challenging, but its active community aids in resolving issues.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Amplify's usage-based pricing offers cost-effective solutions for smaller projects, increasing ROI through integrated AWS services. Spinnaker is more beneficial for enterprises with its automation for complex deployments, though initial setup costs may be higher.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Amplify

Ranking in Release Automation

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spinnaker

Ranking in Release Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS Amplify is 2.4%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spinnaker is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Shrihari Haridas

DevOps Engineer at Burns & McDonnell

Amplify CLI acts as a single source of truth

The Amplify CLI acts as a single source of truth. You install the SDK from there, and using the Amplify API, you can talk to and manage AWS services directly from your code. You don't need to go to the GUI and click through menus - everything is manageable through the Amplify API at the code level. AWS Amplify integrates seamlessly with other services through AWS CloudFormation. Amplify first connects to the cloud for me. Whenever we write down the SDK, it's managed by CloudFormation. CloudFormation still happens on our cloud for your application because everything is updated with the help of cloud automation. Anything we need to change, we just add it to Amplify, and Amplify triggers the CloudFormation templates. Then it logs permission, updates the whole thing, or whatever you need it to ask.

Read full review

Anurag Bandyopadhyay

Product Development Engineer at Razorpay

Useful to create custom pipelines

Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is user management, which includes authentication and authorization."

"Typically, whenever we make changes and need to switch environments (e.g., dev to production), it's easy for our developers to maintain the state of each environment and make customizations as needed. They don't necessarily need to involve the cloud team for basic management."

"I didn't host my application but have used their backend as a service. It was a complete package with authentication, AWS AppSync, DynamoDB, and GraphQL. AWS Amplify is great if you don't know backend development and don't want to struggle with other backend services like MongoDB. You don't have to worry about what backend language or database to use. If you're confused, enroll with AWS Amplify. I also recommend Google Firebase for similar purposes."

"The only tricky part I experienced was during the initial installation. I followed the documentation, but it wasn't working for some reason. I had to modify some local files in the CLI-generated folder to get it to work. I had to dig deep to find the issue, and it wasn't mentioned in the docs. So, some issues could be better highlighted in the AWS CLI documentation, which would help developers integrate other services more easily. AWS needs to improve its support."

"The link with Figma is very nice. You can create your design in Figma, and then you can import it into AWS Amplify and use it. You can link it to your data source and data bindings."

"One of the things I like best about AWS Amplify is its ease of use and strong integration with other AWS services, which enhances efficiency."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Amplify is authentication."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its intuitive interface for converting existing Kubernetes specs into working pipelines. It's easy for anyone to deploy anything on any environment when they need to test or deploy for a specific merchant or use case. Instead of going into the specs and changing different variables, they can do it through the UI, which is very useful."

"Spinnaker is used for automating a variety of deployment tasks, infrastructure, provisioning tasks, and all kinds of things."

"There is a good community around the product that makes troubleshooting possible."

"The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback."

Cons

"AWS Amplify could improve in the deployment. It would be beneficial to have more methods, such as automation."

"AWS Amplify can be improved in some areas, particularly in providing more robust documentation and easier customization options."

"AWS can implement multiple web applications, and cross-platform applications, like iOS."

"The documentation needs improvement, as it is not user-friendly and can be challenging for novices."

"I don't think there are major issues, but there is room for improvement in the UI/UX of AWS Amplify. The UI still needs to be more polished and user-friendly. It's currently a bit like drag-and-drop initially, but there should be more options to customize the UI based on our needs."

"I like AWS Amplify's documentation. It's comprehensive and includes many examples, so you don't need to ask for help much - you can refer to the docs. It's easy to use. I also appreciate the cost structure. You only pay for what you use. For example, if you use 100 GB, you're charged for that, but if you don't use it, you pay the maintenance cost."

"Its capability to handle big projects needs to be improved. If you generate a user interface in Figma and import everything where all components are in one directory, currently, it is complicated. It isn't able to cope with that. For small projects, it is not an issue, but if you have big projects and you want to use AWS Amplify, then it gets more difficult. That is the most important point for me. It should be improved to cope better with bigger projects."

"Every time it goes to run a pipeline, it just generates a lot of data, and its database is not exactly tuned out of the box, meaning it is not tuned for high scalability."

"Spinnaker's configuration setup is too complicated and should be made easy."

"Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product."

"Log-wise, we need to understand why something has failed so that we can understand and try to fix it the moment the issue is reported. The solution could use more robust monitoring."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on what your use case is and whether you're an existing AWS customer. It's a pay-as-you-go model, so not expensive."

"When you're just starting, it is free. You have to pay only when you reach a certain amount of usage. I'm still at the early stage. So, I don't have to pay a lot. At the moment, it is not too expensive for me. It is worth the money."

"Spinnaker is an open-source product. The tool is completely free for users."

"The solution is open-source."

"Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

22%

Retailer

14%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How to estimate whether using the AWS services is worthwhile for saving time and money for manufacturing at a retailer company?

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of using AWS services for manufacturing at a retailer company involves a comprehensive analysis. To make an informed decision, you should consider factors like the...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Amplify?

Typically, whenever we make changes and need to switch environments (e.g., dev to production), it's easy for our developers to maintain the state of each environment and make customizations as need...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Amplify?

I find the pricing of AWS Amplify reasonable, considering the value it provides, although opinions may vary based on usage.

See all answers

What do you like most about Spinnaker?

The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spinnaker?

The solution is open-source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spinnaker?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CodeDeploy vs AWS Amplify

Compared 57% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS Amplify

Compared 34% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS Amplify

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS Amplify Competitors

Octopus Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 45% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Spinnaker

Compared 22% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 18% of the time

GitLab vs Spinnaker

Compared 16% of the time

More Spinnaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify

April 2025

Download AWS Amplify product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

April 2025

Download Spinnaker product report

Overview

AWS Amplify is a set of purpose-built tools and features that lets frontend web and mobile developers quickly and easily build full-stack applications on AWS, with the flexibility to leverage the breadth of AWS services as your use cases evolve. With Amplify, you can configure a web or mobile app backend, connect your app in minutes, visually build a web frontend UI, and easily manage app content outside the AWS console. Ship faster and scale effortlessly—with no cloud expertise needed.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Spinnaker provides application management and deployment to help you release software changes with high velocity and confidence. Spinnaker is an open-source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers. If you are looking to standardize your release processes and improve quality, Spinnaker is for you.

Spinnaker

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Amplify vs. Spinnaker report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.