Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The WAF - the web application firewall itself - is great.""The solution is stable.""The friendly user interface is valuable.""What's most valuable in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its deployment capability, the ability to deploy in a dispersed service, with the service engines that can disperse and have a single control plane that can control the load balancing services across any available platform, wherever needed. The analytics of Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and flexibility of deployment are its most valuable features and the reasons why many people buy it."

More Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Pros →

"The solution is very easy to use and easy to understand. It's quite an intuitive system.""F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is very easy to use, from SSL Management to enabling, disabling loads, applications, systems, and monitoring. Overall the solution keeps our application functional from a client's perspective 24 hours a day, seven days a week.""The most valuable feature is customization.""The feature I find the most valuable is the support infrastructure.""The support from F5 BIG-IP LTM is good.""The main reason that we suggest this product to our clients is the great integration with other security tools, such as IBM Guardium.""We enjoy its overall ease of use.""The most valuable feature of this solution is IP Intelligence."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pros →

"It doesn't match the development structure or user community of our existing product. It pales in comparison to that.""One struggle with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its integration with other VMware products. Integration could be improved in the solution so that you have a more unified control plane with it and other data center security and networking products that VMware sells. There has been a bit of a lag on the roadmap of new features that have come out there recently, but better interoperability with the hyperscale environments such as the AWS, Azure, GCPs of the world, and simpler deployment and interoperability with those existing tools, are areas that are receiving attention and could use additional attention today. These are the areas for improvement in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer.""The initial setup is a bit complex.""IDS and IPS sites need to be more progressive."

More Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Cons →

"I would like to see better integration.""In terms of what could be improved, I would expect more integration with different platforms and more integration with the backend systems. Additionally, in the next release, I would like a more secure version.""Right now, there are a lot of products within F5's portfolio. They acquired a couple of companies like NGINX and Volterra. Some features and technologies overlapped when this acquisition occurred. They need to refine it and come up with a single, proper solution. F5 should focus more on zero trust network access (ZTNA).They should be more focused on that framework because the industry is moving towards that. Everyone is talking about SASE and zero trust.""F5 could improve the rule-setting capabilities in the GUI, and they need to simplify web management. For example, the menus in the Citrix GUI are easier to navigate, with a clean structure and layout.""There are not very many areas for improvement, but the price is high.""A lot of functions that are attributed to iRules can actually be simple profile changes. iRules do have a certain performance impact. Therefore, instead of writing simple iRules, they can create certain profiles for classes that will perform the same function.""It is a hardware load balancer, and its installation procedure is more complex than a software load balancer. There are pros and cons of using hardware load balancing. You have to have specific hardware deployed in your data center to activate this load balancer. They never came up with any software-based load balancing solution. It is all hardware-based.""The pricing could always be better. It's a bit expensive."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer are really variable. The product can be sold from a bandwidth utilization perspective. It can be sold from a per CPU perspective, depending on if you're looking at on-premises or hyperscale environments. Licensing costs vary quite a bit if you're familiar with the AWS Calculator, where you can see that it can widely vary per licensing model. On a scale of one to five, with one being not very good value for the money and five being great, I would rate the pricing for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer a five because its pricing is extremely competitive. Not all features are included with the license, for example, there's single licensing."
  • More Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "When we purchased additional licenses for our other locations, we received a discount of between 20% and 25%."
  • "F5 BIG-IP can be expensive, although there are trial versions available which are helpful to find out if the solution is right for your company."
  • "The price should be reduced because it is expensive when compared to the competition."
  • "The solution is quite expensive if we compare it with the competition."
  • "It is a bit expensive product. Kemp Loadmaster is much cheaper than F5. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It can be for one year or three years."
  • "The price of the solution is sometimes expensive."
  • "You can buy it on a yearly basis, or you can go for a subscription. For on-premise boxes, it is just the RMA."
  • "Compared to using open-source products, the prices are not cheap."
  • More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The WAF - the web application firewall itself - is great.
    Top Answer:I'm not sure if there is a particular area that needs improvement. The initial setup is a bit complex.
    Top Answer:F5 BIG-IP LTM can improve on the SSL loading which includes the authentication of certificates. Although, most of these issues have been solved there are still some issue that persists. In a feature… more »
    Top Answer:F5 BIG-IP LTM is used for delivering applications and protecting the application from web attacks.
    Top Answer:Apart from throughout consideration. Radware license charges based on throughput and F5 charges based on features only. For example, if you buy F5 with an appliance throughput of 10g that throughput… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Avi Software Load Balancer
    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
    Learn More

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is an application delivery controller (ADC) platform. The solution provides scalable application delivery across any infrastructure and allows your organization to deliver multi-cloud application services, such as load balancing, autoscaling, application security, container networking, and web application firewall. It is designed with 100% software load balancing to ensure a fast and secure application experience. Additionally, Avi Networks Software Load Balancer offers elasticity and delivers intelligence across any environment.

    The Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is unique because

    • It can scale from 0 to 1 million SSL transactions per second in minutes.
    • It can achieve 90% faster provisioning and 50% lower TCO than a traditional appliance-based approach.

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Product Highlights

    • Troubleshoots application issues in less than a minute.
    • Alerts you of potential risks with SSL certificates and TLS versions used.
    • End-to-end timing for each transaction to help solve end-user experience issues.

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Features

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Automated application delivery
    • Seamless integration with the CI/CD
    • Built-in analytics
    • End-to-end visibility
    • Actionable insights
    • Security
    • “Network DVR”-like capability to record and replay specific transactions
    • Google-like search filters transactions based on device, location, errors, etc.

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Avi Networks Software Load Balancer. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Multi-cloud application services: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer provides consistent, enterprise-grade application services, including load balancing, WAF, and container networking across heterogeneous environments. The multi-cloud application services can be deployed on bare metal, VMs, or containers in any data center or public cloud environments.
    • Faster application provisioning: With this solution, you gain automation with 100% REST APIs and self-service like public cloud.
    • Better business decisions: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer uses analytics to deliver application insights and help you drive more intelligent decisions.
    • Containerized applications: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is a proven solution to deploy container-based workloads in production environments using Kubernetes/OpenShift/Tanzu clusters. It includes multi-cluster, multi-site support for containerized applications.
    • Lower TCO: The solution is 100% software, and does not require any proprietary hardware. In addition, because it offers on-demand autoscaling, there is no over-provisioning. Lastly, point-and-click application troubleshooting means there is no need for a black box.
    • Software-defined architecture: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is designed with a software-defined architecture with a centralized control plane (Avi Controller) and distributed data plane (Avi Service Engine). Because of this, elastic autoscaling is made easy.
    • Better end-user visibility: The solution gives you granular visibility into end-user experiences and server response in real time. It also empowers application owners with end-user stats to optimize and improve apps.
    • Application health score: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer summarizes analytics information into a helpful health score that provides a quick snapshot of the overall applications. The health score it provides is determined by server response time, resource usage, anomalous traffic, and security posture.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your apps via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on app and server and connection management conditions, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. BIG-IP LTM's architecture includes protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications. BIG-IP LTM tracks the dynamic performance levels of servers and delivers SSL performance and visibility for inbound and outbound traffic, to protect the user experience by encrypting everything from the client to the server.

    BIG-IP LTM provides enterprise-class Application Delivery Controller (ADC). You get granular layer 7 control, SSL offloading and acceleration capabilities, and advanced scaling technologies that deliver performance and reliability on-demand. The highly optimized TCP/IP stack combines TCP/IP techniques and improvements in the latest RFCs with extensions to minimize the effect of congestion and packet loss and recovery. Independent testing tools and customer experiences show LTM's TCP stack delivers up to a 2x performance gain for users and a 4x increase in bandwidth efficiency.

    Learn more about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer
    Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Sample Customers
    Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos
    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Company Size
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is ranked 10th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 4 reviews while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 46 reviews. Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is rated 8.4, while F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Avi Networks Software Load Balancer writes "Has good analytics and offers flexible deployment as it has feature sets that can be deployed in a lot of different use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Great support, helpful documentation, and is user-friendly". Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, HAProxy, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC and F5 Advanced WAF. See our Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) report.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.