Avast Business Hub vs N-able N-central comparison

Avast Software and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Avast Software is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while N-able is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Avast Software holds a 0.4% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Avast Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Avast Business Hub

Read 12 Avast Business Hub reviews

1,257 Views
50 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 9 N-able N-central reviews

1,783 Views
1,516 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avast Business Hub

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

N-able N-central and Avast Business Hub compete in IT management, both offering key features for enterprise network administration. Although Avast Business Hub is often seen as superior due to its robust features, N-able N-central has an edge with comprehensive monitoring capabilities and better pricing.

Features: N-able N-central provides versatile remote monitoring and management, automated patch management, and robust security tools, ensuring comprehensive system oversight. Avast Business Hub includes an intuitive design, easy-to-use antivirus, and integrated patch management for streamlined network protection.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-central could improve its user interface for simpler navigation, expand integration options with third-party tools, and enhance automation features to minimize manual intervention. Avast Business Hub might focus on expanding its support for large-scale network environments, increasing customization options, and enhancing its reporting features for better data insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able N-central is known for a detailed deployment process, supported by a strong customer service team that helps resolve technical challenges. Avast Business Hub offers a simpler deployment experience with quick customer service assistance, appealing to users who need faster setup.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-central offers competitive pricing with a good return on investment, delivering comprehensive network management. Avast Business Hub presents a cost-effective entry and shows strong ROI with efficient capabilities, often favored for balancing cost and functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avast Business Hub

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (5th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (49th), Ransomware Protection (15th)

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Avast Business Hub is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Crewmem67

IT Consultant at College Notre Dame de Nazareth

Has a free version, is secure and reliable

I'm a consultant. I recommend free Avast, then ESET. If they want to be more secure, you can go to ESET, the bigger license. If you want to have a cheap license, Avast is good. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I do prefer ESET, however. Yet I would recommend either product as they are both pretty good.

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of deployment and the command center that they have are the most valuable. It is basically self-monitoring. It doesn't require that much tinkering after you deploy or install."

"It's straightforward to set up."

"The solution can scale well."

"Avast as a product is as easy as it gets - everything is outlined and transparent in terms of licensing."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Avast Business Endpoint Protection's best feature is its user-friendliness."

"It has increased productivity. IT threats are kept at a minimum because of this product."

"It warns you if there is a threat and it's perfect because it runs in the background and doesn't interfere with anything."

More Avast Business Hub pros

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"Where I have faced a challenge is on the reporting. I would like to see something that provides information regarding the next month or quarter, in terms of reporting."

"The solution needs to be more secure and work to protect us better from people trying to mess with our systems."

"I would like to see better protection and more spyware included with the free version."

"The accuracy of the scanner could be improved."

"It could have a 10,000-feet overview of the whole infrastructure because the software is easily installable on the whole infrastructure and not just the infrastructure, but also the workstation themselves. I would love to have a 360 view of the whole network and basically see from where a test is coming, and if there is an instance in the cloud that is actually misbehaving or if there is a workstation that is infected and stuff like that. It can also have some kind of AI to detect all those things and then cut off the connection from that machine. In Cortex, you can link the logs, reports, and all that stuff. You can also see the full picture of when it happened, and you can trace it back all the way to a file or something else. I would like to see similar functionality in Avast Business Endpoint Protection."

"Avast Business Endpoint Protection would be improved with more frequent updates."

"The solution could improve by providing more security."

"It reduces network and bandwidth speed."

More Avast Business Hub cons

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the free version."

"There are no costs other than licensing."

"I am using the free version of Avast."

"If you become a partner, you will receive the wholesale price."

"It is $75 per license for a year. There are no additional costs."

"We are on a monthly subscription for Avast Business Endpoint Protection."

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avast Business Endpoint Protection?

The product is affordable. It is becoming more complex, with more elements required in the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avast Business Endpoint Protection?

Segmentation and centralized manageability could be improved for large organizations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Avast Business Endpoint Protection?

We use the solution for B2B and B2C use cases.

See all answers

What do you like most about N-able N-central?

The solution's service is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

My use cases for N-able N-central always start with hardware monitoring, but since Enable expanded its portfolio, it's always getting more and more options and use cases. Sometimes we start with th...

See all answers

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 32% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 7% of the time

AhnLab V3 Internet Security vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Avast Business Hub

Compared 6% of the time

More Avast Business Hub Competitors

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 25% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 24% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 15% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 11% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 8% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Internet Security

July 2025

Download Avast Business Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

July 2025

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

Built on the largest, most globally dispersed threat detection network in the world, Avast Business Endpoint Protection Solutions deliver superior, enterprise-grade protection that keeps small and medium businesses safe from today’s threats - and tomorrow’s.

Avast Software

N-able N-central is a comprehensive tool for monitoring networks, managing assets, automation, remote access, patch management, and ensuring system security. It is predominantly used by managed services providers to manage systems, servers, routers, and firewalls.

N-able N-central provides robust remote management and monitoring functionalities. It offers a user-friendly GUI and strong asset tracking capabilities. Integration with ticketing systems, CrowdStrike, and N-able EDR enhances monitoring and security. Automation features allow scheduling tasks, responding to system triggers, and automating problem resolution. Users appreciate ongoing enhancements and transparency about its roadmap.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Remote Connectivity: Provides smooth remote control for troubleshooting and support.
Reporting Suite: Offers comprehensive reporting tools for network insights.
Patch Management: Efficiently manages system updates to maintain security.
Intuitive GUI: User-friendly interface backed by solid support.
Asset Tracking: Powerful tracking of all managed devices.
Integration: Supports ticketing systems and security tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR.
Automation: Schedules tasks and automates problem resolution.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in the reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and integration streamline workflows.
Improved Security: Robust monitoring and security features protect networks.
Cost Savings: Comprehensive tool reduces the need for multiple solutions.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface and strong support simplify management.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, managing a large number of devices.

N-able N-central is widely implemented across various industries, providing essential network management and security functionalities. It is particularly useful for managed services providers in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust monitoring, remote access, and asset management are critical for operational efficiency.

N-able

Sample Customers

Benassi & Benassi, P. C.

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central

July 2025

Free Report: Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avast Business Hub vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.