


Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
It has saved us more than 50% of our time.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
The ROI is that we are not waiting for a breach but being proactive rather than reactive.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
Throughout the migration, they remained available for several hours without complaint, providing assistance at every step.
In my experience, I have never encountered a junior person or someone without knowledge coming into support from SentinelOne.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.
They are there immediately, providing us with the best technical people, solving any issue we had.
They gave me a trial period, did multiple follow-ups, and were reviewing themselves the findings to actually understand how their product is performing.
I would rate customer support a nine out of ten because they maintain a competitive price, offer trial periods, provide follow-up, are very responsive, and are effectively hands-on in assisting and offering prompt service and support.
The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud exhibits high scalability.
We've automated in our MDM so any device that we start in our MDM automatically installs SentinelOne.
It is scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.
We don't need to scale it since it's all SaaS.
We are a robust enterprise with thousands of assets in the cloud or tens of thousands.
The user interface that I see doesn't make me very confident that I will be able to extract information in case I had hundreds or thousands of Kubernetes clusters or hundreds or thousands of hosts.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
The only downtime we had was when switching from V1 to V2 but it was smooth.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
I would rate the stability of Sweet Security a ten out of ten.
We have never had any issues with stability.
Sweet Security is stable, as I find that user experience does not tend to reveal many production problems, and when they do occur, they are resolved quickly.
If notifications are available, then it will be more helpful, easy, and time-saving.
Alerts should be directly tied to compliance standards and have a clear role in the overall compliance process.
The Infrastructure as Code service available in PingSafe and the services available in AWS cloud security can be merged so that we can get the security data directly from AWS cloud in PingSafe.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
The next great thing that Sweet Security can do is to turn toward IAC, how it is handled and enforced, to tackle potential breaches of policy before they really happen.
Maybe they can just show the actual signal and not show that there is a lot of vulnerabilities, but indicate which are important.
The main areas for improvement are related to how Sweet Security needs to be customized.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive.
It should not be based on subscription. It should be based on the number of servers that I am scanning.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
They're not cheap, but they're not as expensive compared to other companies.
Sweet Security contains very similar features at a much better pricing.
Sweet Security's pricing is quite fair and cost-effective by many users.
This tool has been helpful for us. It allows us to search for vulnerabilities and provides evidence directly on the screen.
The cloud misconfiguration feature gave us almost zero false positives.
PingSafe has sped up the process by 80% to 90%.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
Sweet Security's reporting tools enhance our insights into potential vulnerabilities and threats as they serve as our eyes and ears inside AWS, telling us what we are doing wrong so we can fix it.
Sweet Security enabled teams to see each detection of activity upon every request made from the application level towards the infrastructure, making it much easier and reducing the time for an analyst to understand what is really happening.
I really love the feature within Sweet Security platform that allows you to visualize the specific packages or functions that are being loaded to the memory and are actually being executed by the operational system.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | 2.6% |
| Sweet Security | 0.8% |
| Automox | 0.6% |
| Other | 96.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 52 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 59 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.
Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.
What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?
What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Sweet Security offers advanced cybersecurity measures designed to protect enterprise-level networks from complex threats, providing efficient monitoring and robust protection capabilities.
Focused on sophisticated threat detection and network security, Sweet Security provides an enterprise-grade solution for cybersecurity challenges. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offering real-time analytics and threat intelligence. Its comprehensive approach ensures high-level data protection and security management, allowing organizations to focus on core functionalities.
What features make Sweet Security stand out?Implementation of Sweet Security across industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce demonstrates its versatility and effectiveness. In finance, it safeguards sensitive financial data; in healthcare, it ensures patient data privacy; and in e-commerce, it protects online transactions from fraud, making it an invaluable asset in today's digital landscape.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.