We performed a comparison between Automation Anywhere (AA) and Kryon RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Being able to connect with third-party tools is the best feature."
"The platform is easy to use, especially for business users."
"The ability to customize added automation to a lot of situations where human judgment and interpretation are not required."
"We use IQ Bot for invoice processing. It can be any type of document. It could be a PDF or any sort of document. It will convert those PDFs into CSV files, which is a structured format. It takes it from an unstructured to structured format. That is why we use IQ Bot."
"By using this, we are saving time and we no need to do routine work, as it is now automated and the result is shared with all of the end-users."
"All the data that comes in has to be QC'd. Automation Anywhere helps us by automating the QC part."
"WLM & Device Pool, where multiple devices perform the same thing parallel and complete the tasks at the same time. The credential manager for security is one of the most valuable features for storing credentials and providing security between the developer usage and future maintenance where passwords expire every 90 days."
"In particular, with our requirements, we have seen reduced dependency on the workforce and we had proper execution of our business process."
"The user-friendly environment allows for easy learning, and the end-to-end workflow management is excellent."
"The number of commands it gives us to edit and modify is really good. It also captures screen activities and plays them back."
"Kryon will allow you to automate processes fast and easy and you do not need to be a developer to automate processes."
"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions. As humans definitely take breaks and there may be absenteeism that is unexpected, the solution provides continuous work. Humans tend to make errors once in a while, but the solution has almost zero percent errors."
"We use Kryon Studio to develop new wizards and we use the features to capture elements from the screen and automate processes... The screen capture allows us to interface with systems which don't have an API, or where the API is very expensive, and it allows us to do on-screen integration."
"The recording capability is valuable because of the amount of data it captures automatically. It's quite good. It means less development, and fewer configuration settings to fill in after you're done."
"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."
"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."
"The stability could be enhanced."
"The setup process is not easy compared to the competition, and this can be a barrier to entry."
"Instead of depending on other open-source BPM products, AA should provide their own BPM for attended automations."
"They are already working on this: The boom of generative AI, the next-gen technologies, including advanced AI and ML technologies, are in the roadmap. I would like to see more and more AI integration and a bit more analytics. That would be great."
"Automation Anywhere should improve its OCR command, as it's my observation that I have faced data loss or improper data being extracted."
"Room for improvement is more on the IQ Bot side: How quickly we can adopt and deploy it?"
"AA sometimes poses compatibility problems with new web browser versions like Chrome."
"It is very difficult to create and automate timetables because they are modal, and it would be helpful if the bot could assist us with this."
"What we are lacking is OCR, the ability to read text. We would like it to have the ability to take a page which is free text and analyze it, and then for the robot to know what to do next. This ability does not exist in Kryon products."
"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."
"There are limitations on integrations with other platforms like ServiceNow. There are some issues integrating. It's not a really an open system. The product, its design, etc., is really good, but they have to look at the openness, how to integrate with other products which are available in the market, as well as with our own solutions. You can do integration but it is not so easy."
"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging. That would be helpful."
"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI. It has to be measured over three or five years."
"With the customer support, there have been some times where we have had to go through explaining the issue a couple times because it has gone through a couple of people's hands. There have been a couple of scenarios where we have had to re-explain the issue and bring somebody new up to speed on what is going on or what the problem is."
"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool."
"What needs improvement in Kryon RPA is the support. Sometimes, the solution has problems, so I contacted support, but I didn't receive immediate help from the team. You have to wait a while before the problem gets solved. This happens a few times in terms of getting cases solved. It would also be better if Kryon RPA had a cloud version because currently, from what I know, it only has an on-premise version, though I could be wrong about that. There isn't any additional feature I'd like added to Kryon RPA because it's a good service, but the support is very, very bad, so that area could be improved."
Automation Anywhere (AA) is ranked 3rd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 485 reviews while Kryon RPA is ranked 13th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 26 reviews. Automation Anywhere (AA) is rated 8.4, while Kryon RPA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automation Anywhere (AA) writes "Automation Co-Pilot enables us to present details from CRM for business management on one page". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kryon RPA writes "The tool helps with speed to market, efficiency, and accuracy". Automation Anywhere (AA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Kryon RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Nintex RPA and Jiffy.ai Automate. See our Automation Anywhere (AA) vs. Kryon RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.