Auth0 vs Ubisecure Identity Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Auth0 Logo
3,756 views|2,487 comparisons
Ubisecure Logo
120 views|89 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auth0 and Ubisecure Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."
  • "There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."
  • "Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."
  • "It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."
  • More Auth0 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the product is scalability.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:It is expensive and not friendly to small developers. On the other hand, Clerk is user-friendly for smaller companies. Auth0 could become more easier. B2B organizations need to catch up with the… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,756
    Comparisons
    2,487
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    556
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    120
    Comparisons
    89
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management solution that securely authenticates and authorizes users on different platforms and applications. It offers seamless integration, easy configuration, and reliable performance for managing identity and access. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and support for multi-factor authentication. 

    With robust documentation and excellent customer service, Auth0 enables developers to efficiently implement authentication and authorization processes. Its valuable features include easy integration, robust security, seamless single sign-on, and customizable authentication options. Auth0 also enhances organizational operations and productivity by streamlining processes, improving collaboration and communication, reducing errors, and facilitating seamless integration with existing systems. 

    It’s the best way for Developers to embed proven identity management

    IAM is complex. IDaaS helps reduce the risk, cost and time it takes to build reliable and secure Identity & Access Management (IAM) functionality into applications. Ubisecure IDaaS is API first and empowers developers to embed common IAM functionality and identity services into their own applications. It gives developers the technology to maintain a focus on security and reliability, and get secure, usable applications to market faster.

    Sample Customers
    1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota
    S Group, SokoPro, Finnish Goverment, Ecraft, Grano
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Auth0 is ranked 1st in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 13 reviews while Ubisecure Identity Platform is ranked 13th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Auth0 is rated 8.4, while Ubisecure Identity Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Provides interface application integration, but Management API needs to be improved". On the other hand, Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and ForgeRock, whereas Ubisecure Identity Platform is most compared with ForgeRock.

    See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.