We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The solution is good for data models."
"The product is stable."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AuraQuantic vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.