AuditBoard vs MEGA HOPEX comparison

AuditBoard and MEGA International are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while MEGA International is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. AuditBoard holds a 6.9% mindshare in G, compared to MEGA International’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of MEGA International users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,636 Views
1,472 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MEGA HOPEX

Read 41 MEGA HOPEX reviews

4,077 Views
326 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

MEGA HOPEX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

MEGA HOPEX and AuditBoard compete in enterprise IT solutions, specifically focusing on IT Portfolio Management and auditing processes, respectively. MEGA HOPEX appears to have an advantage in providing a holistic view of enterprise architecture, while AuditBoard simplifies auditing and centralizes documentation.

Features: MEGA HOPEX provides a comprehensive suite for IT Portfolio Management, allowing organizations to manage technology assets and link different architecture practices. It excels in generating architecture from business processes and creating a unique repository for architecture solutions. In contrast, AuditBoard equips users with tools for real-time editing of work papers, seamless workflow management, and centralized documentation in the cloud, which simplifies audit trails.

Room for Improvement: MEGA HOPEX could enhance its reporting and analytics, improve stability, and offer more intuitive interfaces. Users also seek better cloud integration and lower pricing. AuditBoard, on the other hand, faces challenges with its structured approach, needing more flexibility. Users suggest improvements in survey functions, video communication integration, and clearer update communications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MEGA HOPEX offers deployment options in On-premises, Private, and Public Cloud, and is supported by responsive customer service. However, users occasionally rely on professional services for custom solutions. AuditBoard also offers deployment in Private and Public Cloud environments, with its customer service praised for effectiveness and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: MEGA HOPEX is viewed as costly but delivers strong ROI through its extensive features. Licensing costs are annual, with potential upfront costs. AuditBoard's pricing model, based on the number of controls, can lead to unexpected expenses. Users recommend a loyalty program to mitigate price fluctuations. Both products offer good value, though MEGA HOPEX is recognized for its functional breadth while AuditBoard is noted for reasonable pricing relative to its advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (9th)

MEGA HOPEX

Ranking in GRC

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (3rd), Business Process Design (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 6.9%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MEGA HOPEX is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

JorgeValdez

Enterprise Architect at Banco Ripley Chile

A simple and intuitive tool that provides more features than other tools in the market

The solution can be used to model customer journeys and business processes I use the solution for my customers to model banking products. I also model and define business capability. The biggest value of the product is that we can use it to work in different industries like government,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

More AuditBoard pros

"HOPEX has a panel that offers various views. I think that is very good. MEGA has an app for integrating with a lot of apps. We help our clients integrate HOPEX with a different product like Apple Gateway, for example. I've been with the company for 15 years, and we connect with everything. Our clientele includes almost all of the banks in Mexico."

"The tool is very simple and intuitive to use."

"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."

"I have observed MegaHOPEX has capabilities in architecture and other areas."

"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."

"I find the process modeling and value chain features valuable. The application portfolio management functionality and workflow management capabilities are also nice. It provides a holistic view for stakeholders and helps align IT with business strategies. It facilitates collaboration across the organization and covers all domains, including business, applications, technology, and data."

"Its availability is very good."

"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."

More MEGA HOPEX pros

Cons

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

More AuditBoard cons

"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."

"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."

"MegaHOPEX lacks comprehensive features that a governance tool should have, particularly in data governance."

"Better documentation and training would be helpful."

"There could be continuous AI enhancements for the platform."

"MEGA HOPEX's initial setup could be easier. The newer version is better but they still need to improve the process. The deployment took approximately four to eight hours."

"MEGA HOPEX can improve process simulation in the BPA module. If the solution was better we would not have to use another solution for this purpose. Simulating scenarios in the future for the to-be processes is in demand. If we can have the simulation engine built inside MEGA HOPEX, we would not have to purchase another license or solution to integrate them with each other. This would be a great improvement."

"The solution is quite expensive."

More MEGA HOPEX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"MEGA HOPEX's licensing costs are yearly."

"The product is reasonably priced for the value it offers. There's a good balance between cost and features."

"The tool is relatively expensive."

"It is very expensive."

"The product has a high cost."

"The pricing depends on the number of licenses purchased."

"If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive."

"The price of the support depends on the vendors that are reselling this module or the MEGA HOPEX version 5. We are on premium support and are their only partners in the GCC, we have a premium support contract with them. The support we have is not with the client. The client does not bear the cost, it's us who bear the cost."

More MEGA HOPEX pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look ...

See all answers

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about MEGA HOPEX?

The platform is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MEGA HOPEX?

MEGA HOPEX is perceived as somewhat expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 34% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 19% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 18% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

LeanIX vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 14% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 10% of the time

ARIS BPA vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 7% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 7% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 5% of the time

More MEGA HOPEX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

August 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

MEGA HOPEX

August 2025

Download MEGA HOPEX product report

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

MEGA HOPEX is a single software platform that combines integrated software solutions including privacy and data management, business process analysis, and risk management. By connecting business, IT, data, and risk perspectives, MEGA HOPEX helps your organization get the visibility you need and also helps improve decision-making by using connected EA to eliminate silos and foster collaboration. As a SaaS solution, MEGA HOPEX is scalable, flexible, and secure. It relies on Microsoft Azure infrastructure and is designed to seamlessly and easily integrate into your digital ecosystem. The MEGA HOPEX platform enables you to develop an integrated approach to risk management, business optimization, and data governance, as well as to build a clear IT roadmap.

MEGA HOPEX Features

MEGA HOPEX has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Flexible metamodel configurability: MEGA HOPEX can be adapted to your operating model with easy-to-use customization options. In addition, it gives you the option to expand functionalities and import ready-to-use content through the HOPEX store.

Intuitive workflows: The MEGA HOPEX platform includes intuitive workflows that help accelerate business value delivery and also helps to foster collaboration among all stakeholders.

Ready-to-use enterprise portal: With MEGA HOPEX’s ready-to-use enterprise portal, it is easy to share insights across your entire organization.

Contextual search: MEGA HOPEX has a contextual search functionality that enables you to find accurate and trusted data easily with the option to also use filters to narrow your search results.

Reporting and dashboarding: MEGA HOPEX offers out-of-the-box templates for reports and also allows you to build your own reports to monitor and govern your projects with actionable insights and recommendations.

MEGA HOPEX Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing MEGA HOPEX. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Data-driven algorithms: MEGA HOPEX provides smart recommendations based on data-driven algorithms, giving you the ability to share actionable insights using a collaborative enterprise portal and mobile apps.

Intuitive modeling engine: The MEGA HOPEX platform enables you to visually communicate how your operations work and see how business, IT, and data are connected through building different diagrams.

Improved collaboration and alignment: MEGA HOPEX has a data discovery tool that extracts data from various sources to build your data catalogs. The platform’s automated discovery of applications, data, and processes, along with its automated diagram generation and intelligent workflows, improve productivity, collaboration, and alignment.

Accelerates project delivery: By using MEGA HOPEX, you can develop synergies and avoid duplicative efforts by connecting strategy, business, IT, data, and risk perspectives on the same platform.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the MEGA HOPEX solution.

PeerSpot user Kayode A., Enterprise Architecture Consultant at ZealHosts Consulting, says, “What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good. The fact that you can decompose is also valuable, as is the file D structure. Also, the fact that you can have your own logical repository structure and you can drag and drop is very valuable. This is largely because of its intuitiveness. Once you understand the logic behind the tool, MEGA HOPEX is quite intuitive. I also like the ability to create custom reports. I like the fact that you can share repository content via web to other end users who are not architects.”

A Software Architect at a transportation company mentions, “The main feature that we like the most is the ability to have a unique repository where all the architects can interact and play together with the shapes of different architecture solutions. They have a unified repository where users can share the developments they're working on. Its availability is very good.”

An IT Consulting Manager at a tech services company comments, "We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."

MEGA International

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Aetna, Fannie Mae, M&T Bank, Glatfelter Insurance Group, Zions Management Services Company, The College Board, Baxter Credit Union, AXA Financial, Missouri Department of Conservation, New York State OTDA, MEG Energy Corp, Walgreens, Procter & Gamble, Biogen Idec, Gilead Sciences, Organic Valley, Trinity Health, Nissan and Ford

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX

July 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. MEGA HOPEX report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.