Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Datadog comparison

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 187 Datadog reviews

20,789 Views
13,763 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Datadog are key players in IT performance monitoring. Datadog holds an edge due to its diversity in features, making it a choice for extensive operational needs.

Features: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] offers robust transaction monitoring, insightful root cause analysis, and ease of use without performance overhead. Datadog provides comprehensive integration options, intuitive user interface, and extensive logging and tracing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] could enhance its visualization tools, expand integration capabilities, and improve scalability. Datadog may benefit from simplifying its complex deployment, offering more competitive pricing, and addressing occasional customer support wait times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is noted for its simple deployment process and strong customer service, ensuring an easy transition for users. Datadog, despite its complex setup, provides reliable support and extensive documentation to aid in longer implementation phases.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity AppInternals [EOL] offers cost-effective initial setup and clear ROI through targeted features. Datadog, while perceived as more expensive, justifies costs with its advanced feature set and long-term value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: June 2025).

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

187

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1374792

IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update

We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator. At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well. Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity. The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues. From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.

Read full review

Kevin Palmer

DevOps/Security Principal at Raken

Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation

Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

"The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code)."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"The initial setup was straightforward from my own experience, helping integrate within the application and service levels."

"The agents feature in Datadog stands out as a valuable asset within our organization due to its robust functionality, versatility, and role in providing comprehensive monitoring and observability capabilities."

"Monitors have also been very valuable when setting up our on-call processes. It makes it easy to set up and adjust alerting to keep our teams aware of anything going wrong."

"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."

"The most valuable features are the dashboards and the reporting."

"Their interface is probably one of the easiest things to use because it lets non-developers and non-engineers quickly get access to metrics and pull business value out of them. We could put together dashboards and give it to people who are non-technical, then they can see the state of the world."

"The dashboards are great."

"We really like the charts and visualization."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"Sometimes, it takes a long time to load the dashboard if we have many charts."

"The pricing is a bit confusing."

"They need to implement template variables into the message response body."

"Another issue that I have is with the search syntax, it could be simpler and it feels like there are too many ways to do the same things."

"The sheer amount of products that are included can be overwhelming."

"I like the idea of monitoring on the go yet it seems the options are still a bit limited out of the box."

"Interactive tutorials could be a game changer."

"When the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

"While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."

"Pricing is somewhat affordable compared to other solutions but in order to really lower the costs of other products you need to plan very carefully your resources usage, otherwise, it can get expensive real quick."

"Datadog does not provide any free plans to use the solution. When I start with a proof of concept it would be sensible to have a free plan to test the tool and check whether it fits the requirements of the project. Before the production stage, it is always good to have a free plan with some limited features, number of requests, or logs."

"They prefer monthly subscriptions."

"Sometimes it's very hard to project how much it will cost for the monthly subscription for the next month when you add certain features. Having better visibility of the cost would give a better experience."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 10% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

No data available

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability