Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Access Points vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Aruba Access Points deliver strong ROI through easy management and cost savings, enhancing efficiency and client loyalty.
Sentiment score
7.6
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN offers significant ROI through a five-year warranty, easy RMA, and triple band capability, enhancing stability.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Aruba Access Points' support varies, generally efficient and praised, though some face delays, with exceptional service in Egypt and India.
Sentiment score
7.6
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN support is effective, with responsive systems and staff, but service consistency varies among users.
For technical support alone, I would give them a score of nine out of ten.
A company called ACT is very good at support.
They were always available when needed, which we appreciated.
Cisco's support is very good and ranks 10 out of 10.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Aruba Access Points offer scalability for enterprises, with users valuing easy expansion despite potential hardware updates for substantial growth.
Sentiment score
7.2
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN scales effectively, satisfying various users with connectivity and adaptability, ideal for growing small to medium enterprises.
Aruba access points integrate well with existing networks via PoE switches.
While scaling up to five hundred users, it may cause some performance issues.
Allowing deployment of fewer access points while covering more area.
Ruckus provides better area coverage and interference withstanding capacity.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Aruba Access Points are highly reliable, with minor issues, consistently achieving high stability ratings from users over time.
Sentiment score
8.3
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is highly reliable, with enduring stability and effective performance, even with older products over five years.
 

Room For Improvement

Aruba Access Points need better coverage, security, user support, scalability, integration, and market competitiveness, facing several user challenges.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN could improve efficiency, coverage, feature options, support, and technology to better compete with Cisco.
I would like Aruba to provide integration capabilities for Microsoft Entra ID, Azure Directory, or other identity verification engines like Okta, Google Identity, or Ping Identity.
Some customers comment that the shape and size of the access point is a little big, especially the one installed in the guest room.
Channel management required manual intervention, especially in environments with multiple floors, leading to potential signal interference issues.
Cambium currently lacks such extensive analytics capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Aruba Access Points offer competitive pricing with mixed reviews, often deemed reasonable, with value impacted by features and licenses.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides cost-effective pricing and licensing, starting at $230, with a favorable total cost of ownership.
The pricing is reasonable and lower than competitors.
They are priced at half the rate of Juniper access points for basic models.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced, comparable and not the most expensive nor the cheapest option available.
Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs.
 

Valuable Features

Aruba Access Points are favored for seamless management, optimal connectivity, robust security, easy setup, reliability, and economical pricing.
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN offers robust, scalable connectivity, easy deployment, and efficient cloud-based management for cost-effective, reliable operations.
Additionally, they do not require any kind of license for implementation.
It is very reliable, and the cost of the hardware is not much compared to Cisco and other products.
The product was scalable, allowing for fewer access points to cover more area, and supported a high number of clients.
Ruckus offers a more extensive coverage range and has better capacity to withstand interference, which I have experienced with Ruckus products.
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Access Points
Ranking in Wireless LAN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Access Points is 1.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI - PeerSpot reviewer
Pricing competitiveness and remote management have enhanced network flexibility
One of the most valued aspects of Aruba access points is their price competitiveness; they are available at half the price of Juniper access points. Additionally, they do not require any kind of license for implementation. Despite this, many customers have their own firewall, and they can control everything from their firewall, ensuring flexibility. Furthermore, the ease of management with Aruba access points enables customers to connect them directly to their network via a PoE switch and manage them remotely from mobile devices.
Md Anwar Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers zero-touch provisioning feature and is very user-friendly
I have used the product, and I haven't found any problem with the tool. The problem with the tool is that its prices are on the higher end. The tool should be made more cost-effective so that anyone can buy and use the product. The product's price is higher than that of other similar brands like Ubiquiti. Cambium should look at the pricing model it offers. Recently, Cambium released Cambium Networks Wi-Fi 7 with just one technology. It is a very outdated technology, and I don't know why it has introduced such a type of technology in 2024. With the new product, I don't know why Cambium has brought in an old technology associated with MIMO. Cambium should design its products more to be like 2x2 MU-Mimo. Cambium also has a product, 2x2 MU-MIMO, that is in the high-price category. In Grandstream and Ubiquiti, products are offered in categories like 2x2, 3x3, or 4x4. In Cambium, the tools have been designed in such a way that the basic model offers 2x2 MU-MIMO. If you need 4x4 MU-MIMO, you need to go with a higher category product, which is very expensive and costlier than the other OEMs in the market. In Grandstream and Ubiquiti, the tools have been designed in such a way that the product lineup is such that the transfer from one model to another model, the pricing gap is about 20 to 30 USD, but in Cambium, it is around 300 to 400 USD to move to the next product, making it an area that should improve. Cambium should design its products within a certain budget. With Cambium, it would be very expensive if I changed from the 2x2 to the 4x4 category. I need to add an additional 400 to 500 USD for the next model of the product.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
7%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Access Points?
After we installed the Aruba switches, the work became faster because the network speed improved.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Access Points?
Due to its pricing, Aruba access points provide good value. They are priced at half the rate of Juniper access points for basic models.
What needs improvement with Aruba Access Points?
I would like Aruba to provide integration capabilities for Microsoft Entra ID, Azure Directory, or other identity verification engines like Okta, Google Identity, or Ping Identity. It is important ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?
Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs. Although nominal, these costs are still there.
What needs improvement with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?
I would like to see better analytics tools in the future for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN ( /products/cambium-networks-wireless-lan-reviews ), similar to Cisco's proximity and presence analytics. ...
 

Overview

Information not available
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Access Points vs. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.