ArcSight Logger vs Security Onion comparison

OpenText and Security Onion Solutions, LLC are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while Security Onion Solutions, LLC is ranked #25 with an average rating of 6.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Security Onion Solutions, LLC’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Security Onion Solutions, LLC users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Logger

Read 32 ArcSight Logger reviews

2,736 Views
2,681 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Security Onion

Read 4 Security Onion reviews

7,942 Views
6,195 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Security Onion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Security Onion are well-regarded tools in the field of cybersecurity. ArcSight Logger leads with pricing and customer support, while Security Onion stands out for its feature-rich offerings.

Features: ArcSight Logger is known for its strong log management capabilities, detailed reporting, and reliable performance. Security Onion, favored for its versatile analytics, open-source nature, and flexible adaptability, offers unique advantages that appeal to many users seeking comprehensive security solutions.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could improve in integration flexibility, scalability, and user interface intuitiveness. Security Onion might enhance its update processes, expand usability documentation, and further develop customer support resources to meet growing user needs. Request for better integration is notably higher among ArcSight Logger users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger receives mixed assessments for deployment complexity but benefits from a robust customer service framework. In comparison, Security Onion is commended for its straightforward deployment process, though its customer service has opportunities for enhancement.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger is associated with higher setup costs yet provides significant returns for specific scenarios. Security Onion offers a more cost-effective solution, attractive to those preferring open-source, with both systems delivering favorable ROI as reported by users.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Security Onion

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Security Onion is 1.9%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Security Onion	1.9%
ArcSight Logger	0.9%
Other	97.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shoaib Abdulla

Sr. Cybersecurity Consultant IT/OT at EJADA

Compliance and cost-effectiveness have improved while critical infrastructure security adapts to evolving needs

ArcSight Logger fulfills compliance requirements and passes audit requirements. It is one of the Aramco standards requirements and is recommended by Aramco for any implementation. Aramco, SABIC, water companies, and electricity companies are critical infrastructure with air-gapped networks. In an air-gapped network, there is no communication going out from that network area to the outside world, even to the corporate network. ArcSight Logger is installed on minimal resources with minimal requirements. There are not many upgrades or new features that come up frequently, though they do occur occasionally.

Read full review

HarryJude

Manager at teshama

Centralized threat monitoring has improved visibility but demands complex setup and configuration

The best features Security Onion offers include acting as the intrusion detection system in my organization and helping me to address traffic, logs, and events happening within the organization. Since Security Onion is an open-source system that integrates with tools like Suricata and Zeek with the ELK stack, it enables threat detection and response capabilities, delivering high-level security measures at a cost, making it suitable for businesses of varying skill levels. These integrations with Suricata and Zeek have greatly impacted our workflow and our team's effectiveness by helping us address issues such as identifying intrusions, evaluating threats, and overseeing log files. This tool is very cost-effective, making it suitable for any size of organization wanting to use it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides information about the risk factors."

"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."

"This product was used to help us get PCI compliant, and its automated functions made it easier so we could concentrate more on real issues instead of standard log collecting and alerting issues."

"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."

"The solution is scalable, and we have approximately 6,000 machines sending logs."

"Data correlation, which unfortunately only comes with an ESM module, is the most valuable feature for us."

"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."

"The solution offers very good performance and is efficient."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"Security Onion is the most mature solution in the market."

"The most valuable feature of Security Onion for security monitoring is its ability to find infected ports."

"Security Onion has positively impacted my organization by greatly improving our security posture, making alert triage easier to handle, simplifying the analysis of threats, and decreasing the cost of threat analysis and detection."

"We use Security Onion for internal vulnerability assessment."

Cons

"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."

"The original Connector Appliance peaked its events-per-second limit much sooner than anticipated and required us to purchase another, and significantly larger, appliance."

"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."

"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."

"Scaling this product is painful."

"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."

"The only drawback is that without ESM, you are limited."

"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"Security Onion's user interface could be improved."

"The initial setup of the solution is a little bit difficult."

"The product is not easy to learn."

"For Security Onion, setting up and configuring the system can be quite challenging for newcomers due to the need for a grasp of networking and security concepts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Security Onion is a free solution."

"Security Onion is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

University

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

This decision is made by higher management as they don't want to have multiple solutions for one solution. ArcSight Logger themselves don't provide good support, but companies such as ours provide ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ArcSight Logger?

We do work for multiple SIEM solutions such as Splunk, QRadar, LogRhythm. My team and I mostly work on ArcSight Logger and Splunk because we are dealing with projects related to these solutions. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ArcSight Logger?

As a department head, my staff uses my credentials and contacts everywhere. Only ArcSight Logger with Splunk was implemented in Aramco, not in other organizations. I rate ArcSight Logger 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 6% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 6% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

Wazuh vs Security Onion

Compared 25% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Security Onion

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Security Onion

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Security Onion

Compared 5% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Security Onion

Compared 4% of the time

More Security Onion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger

June 2026

Download ArcSight Logger product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

June 2026

Download Security Onion product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

No data available

Overview

ArcSight Logger effectively manages vast log data volumes, streamlining complex query execution and data compression while supporting various devices to meet compliance needs.

ArcSight Logger, known for scalability, simplifies handling extensive log data and executes complex queries swiftly. Its data compression features, coupled with versatile device support, allow for smooth security analytics and log collection. Users appreciate its real-time network insights and intuitive interface. However, improvements are needed in indexing speed, user navigation simplification, enhanced system integration, advanced analytics, and comprehensive threat management. Companies leverage ArcSight Logger for on-premises log management, vital for IT asset event monitoring and compliance within telecom and enterprise sectors.

What are the key features?

Scalability: Handles large log data volumes efficiently.
Complex Query Execution: Quickly executes intricate queries.
Data Compression: Optimizes storage with excellent compression.
Device Support: Out-of-the-box compatibility with numerous devices.
Customization: Easily customizes to user needs.
Security Analytics: Provides robust analytics for security requirements.
Real-time Insights: Offers awareness of ongoing network activities.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Compliance Assurance: Meets audit requirements with comprehensive insights.
Time Efficiency: Fast query execution reduces analysis time.
Reduced Storage Costs: Data compression lowers storage expenses.
Enhanced Security: Improves security posture with real-time analytics.

In industries like telecom and enterprise, ArcSight Logger facilitates on-premises deployments to manage logs, process queries, and integrate with security tools, essential for incident response. It aids in retaining logs, monitoring Windows events, overseeing communications, and is employed in fraud prevention and security monitoring involving syslog servers.

OpenText

Security Onion is an open-source Linux distribution for intrusion detection, network security monitoring, and log management. It offers comprehensive solutions for enterprises seeking to enhance their cybersecurity infrastructure.

Security Onion provides a full suite of tools to detect and respond to cybersecurity threats efficiently. As a robust and versatile distribution, it includes capabilities for real-time analysis, network visibility, and threat detection, making it indispensable for security operations centers. Users value this tool for its integration of open-source software with advanced analytics, affording professionals a detailed overview of network traffic and potential intrusions.

What are Security Onion’s most important features?

Intrusion Detection: Utilizes Suricata or Zeek for effective threat monitoring.
Network Security Monitoring: Offers powerful visualization tools for network analysis.
Log Management: Centralizes log collection and analysis.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides integrated dashboards for threat visibility.

What benefits or ROI should you look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced cybersecurity costs due to its open-source nature.
Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats quickly.
Integration Capability: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures.
Scalability: Support for scaling network security operations as needed.

Security Onion finds extensive application in industries such as finance, healthcare, and government sectors, where robust network monitoring is critical. Its ability to integrate with existing security tools makes it a preferred choice for organizations looking to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.

Security Onion Solutions, LLC

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion

June 2026

Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Logger vs. Security Onion report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.