ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ARCON Secure Compliance Man...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of ARCON Secure Compliance Management is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Cloud and Data Center Security
2.2%
Container Security
2.0%
 

Featured Reviews

SarojMohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
May 12, 2023
Great for productivity checking and provides good reports
We use this solution for password encryption and remote access. We are customers of ARCON This solution is good for productivity checking and provides good reports.  We've had instances where some parameters have disappeared and that is frustrating. The automation needs to be improved.  We've…
PK
Jun 4, 2024
Improves our cloud security, is flexible, and user-friendly
The solution is easy to use. The evidence-based reporting is helpful to our DevOps team who manually mitigate the vulnerabilities. Singularity Cloud Security offers a flexible agentless vulnerability scanning solution that allows me to receive alerts directly to my personal email, a feature missing from AWS GuardDuty. Evidence-based reporting that demonstrates how a vulnerability can be exploited is crucial because it allows me to prioritize alerts based on their severity level. This ensures I focus on the most critical issues first. Singularity Cloud Security has improved our organization's security by proactively identifying vulnerabilities that could have significant detrimental effects. It has decreased the number of false positives. Before implementing Singularity Cloud Security our mean time to detection was three to four days. Singularity Cloud Security has significantly improved our mean time to remediation from one hour to just 15 minutes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very user friendly. There are not a lot of clicks and buttons. The tool helps me with the installations. The user can do the installation rather than having a technical guide. I also like the browsing stream. It has a good dashboard."
"Good for productivity checking."
"The support for ARCON ARSIM is very good."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"The tool identifies issues quickly."
"The user-friendliness is the most valuable feature."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are cloud misconfiguration, Kubernetes, and IaC scanning."
 

Cons

"The automation needs to be improved."
"As for what can be improved, definitely pricing. Customers look for pricing and ARCON is a little more expensive than Thycotic. So the pricing model could be improved."
"I would love to have all the products. Currently they have all the server operating systems and network operating systems but they should have all the other devices also included, like security devices. That's what I think is missing. They should also improve the license audit part. If I want to do a license audit from this tool, I'm not able to do it right now."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"Maybe container runtime security could be improved."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive. There are going to be different add-ons for Singularity."
"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."
"It is not that expensive. There are some tools that are double the cost of PingSafe. It is good on the pricing side."
"Pricing is based on modules, which was ideal for us."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
"The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"
"PingSafe is priced reasonably for our workload."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ARCON Secure Compliance Management?
We've had instances where some parameters have disappeared and that is frustrating. The automation needs to be improved.
What is your primary use case for ARCON Secure Compliance Management?
We use this solution for password encryption and remote access. We are customers of ARCON.
What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive. There are going to be different add-ons ...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
All EDRs are made of different modules. There is a firewall module, an IPS module, and an application module. The application module focuses on the different codes and libraries that can be run on ...
 

Also Known As

ARCON ARSIM, ARCON SCM
PingSafe
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.