ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs PingSafe comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ARCON Secure Compliance Management and PingSafe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: January 2024).
755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very user friendly. There are not a lot of clicks and buttons. The tool helps me with the installations. The user can do the installation rather than having a technical guide. I also like the browsing stream. It has a good dashboard.""The support for ARCON ARSIM is very good.""Good for productivity checking."

More ARCON Secure Compliance Management Pros →

"Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take.""It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."

More PingSafe Pros →

Cons
"As for what can be improved, definitely pricing. Customers look for pricing and ARCON is a little more expensive than Thycotic. So the pricing model could be improved.""I would love to have all the products. Currently they have all the server operating systems and network operating systems but they should have all the other devices also included, like security devices. That's what I think is missing. They should also improve the license audit part. If I want to do a license audit from this tool, I'm not able to do it right now.""The automation needs to be improved."

More ARCON Secure Compliance Management Cons →

"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security.""Maybe container runtime security could be improved."

More PingSafe Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
  • "It was reasonable pricing for me."
  • More PingSafe Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had instances where some parameters have disappeared and that is frustrating. The automation needs to be improved.
    Top Answer:We use this solution for password encryption and remote access. We are customers of ARCON.
    Top Answer:Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a… more »
    Top Answer:It was reasonable pricing for me. The costing model might have changed now since they have been acquired.
    Top Answer:Maybe container runtime security could be improved. But with the acquisition by a bigger company, things might roll out faster, potentially including this feature.
    Ranking
    31st
    Views
    191
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    156
    Rating
    8.0
    25th
    Views
    168
    Comparisons
    123
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    391
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ARCON ARSIM, ARCON SCM
    Learn More
    PingSafe
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    ARSIM – a risk, security and Information Management tool - is used for automated risk assessment and analysis. It enables a central repository of all IT risks and associated controls, automates information flow for risk assessments, provides aides for initiating necessary actions. These features ensure timely and efficient mitigation of risks. ARSIM Framework includes robust and scalable architecture, that is highly customizable, provides web and windows based user interfaces. It’s powerful connectors and agents work across technologies with several servers and databases.

    PingSafe’s Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP) has all the necessary components to safeguard your multi-cloud environment and infrastructure. PingSafe's unified platform scans your entire cloud infrastructure through an attacker's lens and helps you remediate the most exploitable vulnerabilities with unmatched speed and scale.

    Sample Customers
    RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Retailer8%
    Media Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    January 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2024.
    755,666 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ARCON Secure Compliance Management is ranked 31st in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while PingSafe is ranked 25th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. ARCON Secure Compliance Management is rated 8.0, while PingSafe is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ARCON Secure Compliance Management writes "Great for productivity checking and provides good reports ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingSafe writes "Offers advanced components to safeguard your multi-cloud environment". ARCON Secure Compliance Management is most compared with , whereas PingSafe is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz and Orca Security.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.