We performed a comparison between AppRiver Email Security and Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, TitanHQ and others in Email Security."Microsoft Defender for Office 365 has improved my organization's security. It makes it easier to manage the infrastructure without the help of third-party applications."
"The two main features that prove most beneficial for us are URL scanning and attachment scanning."
"Defender helps us prioritize threats across our organization."
"Does a thorough job of examining email and URLs for malicious content."
"The most valuable feature is protection against malicious links, fishing, and impersonation. You can train people to be aware of these threats, but they're not always careful. When they're using their phones between meetings, they click on a link, and it's game over."
"Some of the valuable features on the email side are anti-phishing, anti-malware, and Safe Links."
"The good part is that you don't have to configure it, which is very convenient."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly. Users can also easily release spam emails."
"They are very easy to use."
"It has provided us with an easy way to avoid invasive mail."
"When sharing files with my colleagues, it provides a comprehensive report on the security status of the document."
"It helped us to achieve process compliance with over 90% effectiveness."
"Mail sanitisation features are second to none."
"Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is quite reliable...It is a very stable solution."
"This solution helped us lock down and have our infrastructure easier to manage."
"Using Check Point has helped us to safeguard our environment and help to protect against spam, as well as other types of attacks against our network."
"Anti-spam and malware phishing are valuable features of the solution."
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Pros →
"The custom alerts have to improve a lot."
"We noticed that from time to time, Microsoft's stability does have problems. Sometimes the service goes up and down. Sometimes they change without prior notice."
"The GUI is sometimes slow to fetch the device report and could be improved."
"The phishing and spam filters could use some improvement."
"This product's effectiveness could be improved, in terms of detecting unwanted spam or even malware between the emails, compared to other products."
"There needs to be an improvement in integrating the product to work across multiple operating systems, and to have better support for non-Microsoft file types."
"Microsoft wants its well-paying customers to finish testing some of its half-baked products, find bugs, and report bugs back to Microsoft's team, which is a little frustrating for those who have to manage it and roll it up to thousands of people across the organization."
"I'd like some additional features any product can give me to protect our environment in a better way."
"Email security checks contain a small number of false positives."
"It needs to make sure that the application is up to date with new attacks. They should also send us the demo or introductions for their new incoming features."
"It would be useful to have more logs and in aggregate mode, perhaps through a specific report, that can be more easily used for troubleshooting."
"One thing which annoys me with the Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is its customer support portal which still lags in service even after so many developments."
"If you face any configuration problems, Check Point is the only solution."
"A possible improvement for the solution would be to be able to implement artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy of detecting spam and malicious emails that are constantly arriving."
"It does not provide for standalone configuration on the security gateway. Instead, you need to have a management server/smart console for managing it."
"There could be an extension of the trial period to 60 days."
"The pattern used to filter emails could be improved"
"There's definitely room for improvement when it comes to adapting to different languages in one environment."
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Cons →
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppRiver Email Security is ranked 23rd in Email Security with 2 reviews while Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is ranked 9th in Email Security with 32 reviews. AppRiver Email Security is rated 9.0, while Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AppRiver Email Security writes "Pricing that is competitive, excellent technical support, and email security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade writes "Effectively secures data centers against various threats, including spam emails and provides policy-based control". AppRiver Email Security is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Avanan and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is most compared with Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Abnormal Security, Cisco Secure Email and Fortinet FortiMail.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
