No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apple iOS SDK vs Codename One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apple iOS SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Codename One
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Apple iOS SDK is 6.4%, down from 27.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Codename One is 5.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apple iOS SDK6.4%
Codename One5.2%
Other88.4%
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2132481 - PeerSpot reviewer
Investment Banking Summer Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
A stable and easy-to-use product that provides seamless integration
The best thing about the product is that it provides seamless integration. I can use my Microsoft product on my iPhone, so it's good for work and personal use. I can use it across devices since it's synced up. AirDrop and iCloud are the most valuable features of the solution. The solution is easy to use.
it_user480888 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chicken Little at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications.
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications I ported a couple of large-ish real world Java applications, and maintained a common code base. Future development continues, fully cross platform, on standard desktop Java, Android and iOS. Core Java features are not…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Applications developed through XCode are highly secure and stable"
"I have been working on iOS and Android for more than a year now and I personally found iOS SDK to have more to offer than the Android SDK."
"The apps developed using iOS SDK are known to be highly stable"
"This solution is a really easy and straightforward to use for development, and provides a lot of opportunities to test applications on a simulator before being released."
"The SDK is very stable."
"This solution is a really easy and straightforward to use for development, and provides a lot of opportunities to test applications on a simulator before being released."
"The best thing about the product is that it provides seamless integration."
"The iOS SDK is well documented, and generally allows for relatively easy creation of stable applications within the iOS ecosystem."
"A few things that stand out to me are a well-documented and pretty extensive API, build server, access to native functionality via native interface, easy extension with third-party libraries, active developer support, and attractive pricing."
"To the best of my knowledge CN1 is better than some of the available mobile app development frameworks such as Xamarin and Nativescript because it gives almost 100% -- if not 100% -- write once run anywhere."
"Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications."
 

Cons

"Only mac users can develop applications and games for iphone, and for ipod touch"
"Objective C is different from C/C++ and is difficult to grasp for beginners."
"A Mac is required for developing. Development is strictly restricted to Mac."
"Built on a closed source operating system, so no flexibility to modify and extend the SDK"
"The share password menu doesn’t come up easily when I want to share passwords between my devices."
"My major con for this is that it's Mac specific; if you don't own an Apple computer, you can't (legally) develop for iOS, which is incredibly small minded of Apple."
"We would like to see more development and support for the AI features of this solution."
"We would like to see more development and support for the AI features of this solution."
"Core Java features are not fully supported (introspection, serialization) and many standard functionalities (windows, events) are implemented in an idiosyncratic way, not standard Java."
"Testing through a CLI simulator is free but difficult to setup."
"Windows Phone port. However, that is actively being improved and should be released later this year if all goes well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved in its use."
"The hardware is quite expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Also Known As

iOS SDK
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pmovil, Chemetall Italia SRL, BOi Global Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Apple iOS SDK vs. Codename One and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.