We performed a comparison between Appian and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"Appian also has very flexible local integration."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 36th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS. See our Appian vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.