Apollo GraphOS vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Apollo GraphQL and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Apollo GraphQL is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.0, while WSO2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Apollo GraphQL holds a 0.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apollo GraphQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Apollo GraphOS

Read 1 Apollo GraphOS review

210 Views
210 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews

5,442 Views
5,442 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apollo GraphOS

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apollo GraphOS and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management.

To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apollo GraphOS

Ranking in API Management

31st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apollo GraphOS is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 5.0%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sagor Rana

Front End Engineer at Upwork

Efficiently filters API data though experiences slower performance with larger projects

I would like to see better performance in larger projects. When dealing with large amounts of data, it can become slow, causing users to potentially abandon the application. Improving performance and ensuring the app runs smoothly would enhance user experience. Stability issues, where it sometimes breaks down, need to be addressed as well.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Apollo GraphOS OS for me are its security and authentication processes."

"The documentation is good."

"WSO2 API Manager's most valuable features are the simple interface that is easy to use and the APIs lifecycle."

"WSO2 API Manager is open-source, which offers a range of features not found in other open-source API tools."

"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."

"I think the best part about WSO2 API Manager is that it's highly customizable because it's open-source. The partnership model is quite lucrative for us, it helps us to go and pitch to our customers. You can build a lot of business models yourself that you want to use. You are able to do a lot of the solutions."

"As far as I am aware this solution is the first API Publisher that allows you to create and publish API and to manage the API lifecycle."

"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."

"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage. It sometimes takes longer than three seconds, which can affect loading times and lead to user dissatisfaction. I would like to see improved performance."

"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage."

"WSO2 API Manager should improve its marketplace subscription model and documentation in order to reach a higher level in the market."

"WSO2 API Manager can be improved a lot relating to usability"

"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."

"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."

"The solution’s interface should be more user-friendly."

"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."

"We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing."

"I would like to see improvements in the speed of the solution as it can be a bit slow compared to other platforms along with addressing memory issues would be beneficial."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"I am using the free version."

"For our projects, we found the pricing to be a little high."

"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"

"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."

"The challenge is the increasing pricing, which has led some customers to consider alternatives, like using Spring Boot solutions instead. The rising costs, especially as cores and usage increase, have been a concern, prompting some to migrate to other products."

"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."

"WSO2 API Manager is a costly solution, and its pricing is not competitive enough compared to other products."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apollo GraphOS?

I am not sensitive to nor very knowledgeable about the pricing and setup cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apollo GraphOS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apollo GraphOS?

I primarily use Apollo GraphQL to work with APIs in conjunction with Node.js. When I make API calls, I receive a lot of information, but I only need specific details like names, emails, and photos....

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apollo GraphOS

Compared 33% of the time

Apigee vs Apollo GraphOS

Compared 27% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apollo GraphOS

Compared 26% of the time

WunderGraph vs Apollo GraphOS

Compared 13% of the time

More Apollo GraphOS Competitors

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Apollo GraphOS product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

July 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Apollo GraphOS is a comprehensive platform designed for managing and enhancing GraphQL development. It streamlines the process of creating, testing, and maintaining GraphQL APIs effectively, offering a robust environment for developers.

Apollo GraphOS offers developers a powerful toolkit for streamlining GraphQL API lifecycle management. Its robust structure supports efficient schema design, observability, and collaboration, making it a valuable asset for development teams. These features allow for enhanced control and oversight, ensuring a seamless workflow. However, there is still room for improvement in integration capabilities with other tools and platforms, which users have noted in reviews.

What are Apollo GraphOS's key features?

Schema Federation: Allows seamless integration of multiple services under a unified graph.
GraphQL Insights: Provides in-depth analytics to optimize API performance and usage.
Version Control: Ensures precise and organized tracking of schema changes over time.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork through shared access and communication features.
Security Management: Offers advanced protection mechanisms for your API.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development processes, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Collaboration: Promotes teamwork and efficient communication with shared resources.
Scalability: Supports growth with robust infrastructure adaptable to increasing demands.
Data-Driven Decisions: Enables informed choices through comprehensive analytics tools.

In industries like e-commerce and fintech, Apollo GraphOS enables teams to rapidly implement scalable GraphQL solutions, facilitating real-time data interactions and improving customer experiences. Healthcare sectors utilize it for secure data management, while media industries benefit from dynamic content delivery capabilities.

Apollo GraphQL

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in API Management. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.