Apica vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Apica and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while ManageEngine is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.0. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,035 Views
673 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Applications M...

Read 17 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews

1,182 Views
1,028 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Apica

ManageEngine Applications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and Apica are both comprehensive solutions for application performance monitoring. ManageEngine Applications Manager generally excels in ease of deployment and customer service, whereas Apica stands out in its advanced features and perceived return on investment (ROI).

Features: ManageEngine Applications Manager is praised for its scalability, comprehensive monitoring capabilities, and intuitive navigation. Apica is highlighted for its robust monitoring of network infrastructure, superior capabilities in synthetic monitoring, advanced analytics, and in-depth reporting functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that ManageEngine Applications Manager could enhance its reporting capabilities, reduce resource consumption, and improve its user interface. Common feedback for Apica includes improving its setup complexity, expanding third-party integrations, and simplifying its documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Applications Manager is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Apica users report a more complex deployment process but appreciate the thoroughness of Apica's support once the setup is complete.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Applications Manager is often viewed as more budget-friendly with faster initial ROI due to its lower setup costs and minimal resource requirements. Apica, although having a higher setup cost, is perceived to deliver better long-term ROI through its superior feature set and advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,289 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

ManageEngine Applications M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Bhavani Prasad Paragi

General Manager at Qwikcilver

Implementing this solution has substantially streamlined our asset management processes and enabled proactive issue detection

Our primary application of this solution revolves around IT infrastructure monitoring. We focus on alert consolidation from core network and service levels to enhance our service management framework Implementing this solution has substantially streamlined our asset management processes and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to set up and configure."

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."

"From our standpoint, there are a number of valuable features. The WebHooks are obviously really great. The alert framework is really good and then the reporting and visualizations that you get from the dashboards is good. Those three areas are primarily what my team's focused on in terms of usage from day to day."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically."

More Apica pros

"ITSM is a valuable feature, it complies with the requirements in Pakistan."

"The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard."

"What I like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager is its price point, apart from its technicalities. The solution is cheaper than its competitors. ManageEngine Applications Manager has helpful documentation that makes setting it up straightforward."

"I am impressed with the tool's reporting feature which is simple."

"The Service Level Management (SLM) rules engine stands out due to its flexibility and customization capabilities, making it an invaluable tool for tailoring processes to our specific needs."

"The anomaly detection feature helps with maintaining the system's health. It is regarding our IT incident center."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to be able to monitor Kubernetes."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros

Cons

"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

More Apica cons

"The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience."

"One area of improvement is the dashboard should be more readable and available."

"The problem is that implementation requires a significant amount of mapping effort."

"An area for improvement in ManageEngine Applications Manager is artificial intelligence. If AI is integrated into the solution, it'll be a piece of cake. Currently, it's all configured manually."

"The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide."

"Even with the top-notch dashboard, it could be made stronger in order to have an additional plug-in for analytics."

"The agent often crashes when there is too much load on the application side. If a sudden storm of data comes in, the agent crashes down most of the time."

"Lacks an SIEM solution which can be found in other products."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, it is a cheap tool...The solution's licensing model is subscription-based, in which yearly payments are to be made."

"The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly."

"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."

"The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."

"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager?

ManageEngine Applications Manager's installation is pretty easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 27% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Grafana vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

July 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Applications Manager

June 2025

ManageEngine Applications Manager report

Download ManageEngine Applications Manager product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

Applications Manager

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management (APM) solution that is designed to give users deep insights into both the way that their applications perform and the way that users of those applications experience them. Organizations can use this solution to identify areas where their critical applications are lacking and address them before there are any negative repercussions. ManageEngine Applications Manager is the kind of tool that companies of all sizes can use to keep their applications running in the best way possible.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ManageEngine Applications Manager include:

Gain real-time comprehensive insights. ManageEngine Applications Manager makes it possible for organizations to gain deep insights into every aspect of an application’s performance. This takes place in real time and enables users to take complete control of their application’s management.

Keep applications running smoothly. Organizations don’t have to worry about missing issues that will disrupt users’ ability to have a smooth experience. ManageEngine Applications Manager detects any issues and allows administrators to quickly address them before they can become major problems for users.

Ease of use. ManageEngine Applications Manager is designed to be intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. This saves time and makes organizations more productive.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Features

Some of the many useful features ManageEngine Applications Manager has to offer include:

AI-powered threat detection and remediation. ManageEngine Applications Manager leverages AI software to spot issues as they arise and to alert administrators. Additionally, users can use this AI to automate issue remediation, which will allow administrators to focus on other tasks.

Advanced analytics. ManageEngine Applications Manager uses various analytics tools to enable users to gain critical insights from their data. These include custom dashboards that allow you to display and interpret data.

Real user monitoring. Administrators have access to tools that allow them to monitor users’ application traffic. The tools deliver detailed reports that track various critical pieces of information related to the users and their application user experience.

Reviews from Real Users

ManageEngine Applications Manager is a solution that stands out when it is compared to many of its competitors. It is part of a complete suite of management tools that users can take advantage of. The way that ManageEngine Applications Manager keeps up to date with a regular schedule of software updates enables organizations to manage their applications without worrying that they are missing any important capabilities or features. If any feature is absent, users can integrate the solution with other monitoring solutions. ManageEngine Applications Manager regularly undergoes updates that ensure that users have access to all of the latest features and patches.

Rodrigo T., the CEO of AXIOVISTA spa, writes, “This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature.”

Syed A., the enterprise senior account manager of sales at a tech services company, writes, “Our customers appreciate that ManageEngine sends regular updates, upgrading their software several times a year.”

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

July 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.