Apica vs LogRhythm Axon comparison

Apica and LogRhythm are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while LogRhythm is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to LogRhythm’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LogRhythm users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

398 Views
42 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

LogRhythm Axon

Read 3 LogRhythm Axon reviews

603 Views
46 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

LogRhythm Axon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and LogRhythm Axon compete in the fields of IT monitoring and security management. While Apica offers more favorable pricing, LogRhythm Axon has an edge due to its robust security features and comprehensive analytics, offering a more extensive feature set valued by many users.

Features: Apica provides intuitive monitoring capabilities with real-time insights and a user-friendly setup. LogRhythm Axon stands out with advanced security features and comprehensive analytics, including superior threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Apica could improve its reporting capabilities, expand integrations, and enhance broader data integration. LogRhythm Axon could work on minor improvements in system resource management, address occasional lag in updates, and enhance system efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is praised for easy deployment and reliable support services, whereas LogRhythm Axon, although sometimes more complex to deploy, is supported by responsive customer service that greatly aids the process.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is favored for a cost-effective setup and quicker ROI. LogRhythm Axon, despite higher initial costs, offers long-term value through its security performance, justifying its pricing with perceived longer-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

LogRhythm Axon

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogRhythm Axon is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A tool that offers features like SOAR and UBA, along with an out-of-the-box connector for users

LogRhythm Axon has come up with the AI cloud concept in the market. When it comes to the AI cloud concept, you need to consider that every region has differences when it comes to data sovereignty. The AI cloud concept from LogRhythm Axon was based on real-time AI and ML concepts, along with analytics parts that were carried out. The AI cloud concept from LogRhythm Axon is not something that is available in India, so I want it to be introduced in India soon with data sovereignty compliance in place. LogRhythm should focus more on Axon and its cloud platform, which can be helpful in the future to compete with players like Sentinel and Splunk, which currently offer cloud models to users. With LogRhythm Axon, stability and support are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"It is easy to set up and configure."

More Apica pros

"Scalability-wise, LogRhythm Axon is a good product."

"The search feature within AXON is pretty robust. It's actually very fast in comparison to that in the previous platform. It's going to really help with investigations when they get rules put into the system."

"For me, the most valuable feature of LogRhythm AXON is the log parsing technology it has. With my company, I'm the current policy builder, so not having to know an archaic, cryptic format and being able to visually grab a log and assign an element to a particular meta tag quickly and easily and being able to run tests on that have been super useful. It's going to revolutionize the way the logs are identified and classified."

Cons

"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

More Apica cons

"With LogRhythm Axon, stability and support are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required."

"It's a very beta solution right now, and there are so many features that we would like to see added in, such as integration with Active Directory, which is essential for user management and for streamlining that process significantly."

"I'd give technical support a five out of ten. There are definitely areas that they can improve upon. Faster response times would be wonderful, and having more knowledgeable staff who provide the support would also be great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"I know that there are certain payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the product...The pricing of LogRhythm Axon falls under the mid-range, in my opinion."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

Government

19%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about LogRhythm AXON?

Scalability-wise, LogRhythm Axon is a good product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm AXON?

I know that there are certain payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the product. LogRhythm Axon is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution, especially when compared to produ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm AXON?

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs LogRhythm Axon

Compared 100% of the time

More LogRhythm Axon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm Axon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm Axon product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

LogRhythm Axon offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities for security operations teams. Known for its seamless integration with existing tools, it helps streamline workflows and enhance threat intelligence, making it a valuable asset for cybersecurity professionals.

LogRhythm Axon specializes in empowering security teams with the tools needed to protect against sophisticated threats. Through comprehensive log analysis and real-time monitoring, it delivers actionable insights that optimize threat detection and response. Designed with scalability and customization in mind, it caters to different business needs, helping users achieve efficient security management. Despite its robust feature set, users suggest enhancements in areas like reporting capabilities and ease of use, underscoring areas for future development.

What are some key features of LogRhythm Axon?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous analysis of data for timely threat detection.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Integrates diverse threat feeds for comprehensive insights.
Scalability: Supports growth and adapts to evolving security requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Improved Threat Response: Faster detection and mitigation of threats reduce risk exposure.
Enhanced Security Posture: Offers a holistic view of enterprise security.
Cost Efficiency: Integrates with existing systems, reducing additional expenditures.

LogRhythm Axon is highly effective across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where data security is paramount. Its ability to provide real-time insights and adaptability to sector-specific needs ensures that organizations remain resilient against cyber threats. The implementation process often involves close collaboration with security teams to tailor the functionalities to specific industry requirements.

LogRhythm

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. LogRhythm Axon report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.