Apica vs Coralogix comparison

Apica and Coralogix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.2. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Coralogix’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Coralogix users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

673 Views
257 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

1,538 Views
689 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Apica

Coralogix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and Apica are competitive products in the tech industry. Apica has the upper hand due to its broader range of features, although Coralogix excels in pricing and customer support.

Features: Coralogix offers robust log management, real-time analytics capabilities, and effective log query language. Apica provides comprehensive monitoring solutions, detailed performance insights, and extensive APIs for integration.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix needs to enhance its alerting system, expand integration options, and improve dashboard customization. Apica could benefit from a more intuitive configuration process, enhanced support documentation, and streamlined user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix users report a straightforward deployment experience and commendable customer support. Apica's deployment is quick with detailed setup guides, but users report mixed customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix users find the pricing competitive with satisfactory ROI given its strong support and features. Apica is seen as pricier, but users acknowledge that its advanced features justify the expense, making it attractive to those prioritizing extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Coralogix Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Coralogix

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

21st

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (12th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Coralogix is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

More Apica pros

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

Cons

"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

More Apica cons

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

More Coralogix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 26% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 22% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

July 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

July 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Coralogix

July 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Coralogix

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Coralogix and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Coralogix report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.