Apiary vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management comparison

Oracle and Axway are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while Axway is ranked #32. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to Axway’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Axway users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

405 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

1,768 Views
1,189 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Apiary

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apiary and Axway AMPLIFY API Management are competitors in the API management sector. While Apiary is recognized for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, Axway AMPLIFY stands out for its extensive capabilities, appealing to enterprises that need comprehensive solutions.

Features: Apiary offers ease in API design, testing, and collaborative tools, making it accessible for teams. Axway AMPLIFY provides advanced security, seamless analytics, and robust integration capabilities, catering to complex business needs.

Room for Improvement: Apiary can enhance its customer support and expand features to cater to larger enterprises. Its deployment options could be more versatile. Axway AMPLIFY's interface might be complex for new users. The initial cost may be high for smaller businesses, and simplifying integrations could improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apiary excels in quick deployment due to its intuitive platform but has mixed customer support feedback. Axway AMPLIFY offers cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployment models, with high marks for customer service effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Apiary is geared towards startups with its lower setup cost, making it cost-effective for smaller enterprises. Axway AMPLIFY, while more expensive initially, offers a strong ROI through its comprehensive feature set and scalability, targeting larger businesses with extensive API management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

Sudhanshu Singh

Associate Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

We get stability, scalability, and security

Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"Git integration"

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

Cons

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

The solution has a yearly subscription. The solution’s pricing is competitive. Axway makes a significant impression compared to its peers, especially with a sensitive budget. In many instances, it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Axway's queuing messages could be enhanced.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

We use the solution for ESB and B2B integration between the systems of our business.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Apiary

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apiary

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service vs Apiary

Compared 29% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 15% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

June 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

June 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

Engie Group, Allianz

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

June 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.