We performed a comparison between AntWorks CMR+ and SAP Contextor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Pattern recognition ultimately helps us to circumvent the problems in dealing with format variability in documents and allows us to capture the right data."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Contextor is that everyone is in one place in the program that I need."
"We would like to see the overall accuracy increase from approximately 70% to perhaps 85%."
"SAP Contextor could improve by automating some processes."
AntWorks CMR+ is ranked 10th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 1 review while SAP Contextor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review. AntWorks CMR+ is rated 8.0, while SAP Contextor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AntWorks CMR+ writes "Leading-edge NLP capabilities, efficient training of machine learning models, and the automation saves us significant time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Contextor writes "Increases efficiency, good support, but automation needed". AntWorks CMR+ is most compared with ABBYY FlexiCapture, HyperScience, Kofax RPA and UiPath, whereas SAP Contextor is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and ABBYY FlexiCapture.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
