Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 14, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS
Ranking in Database as a Service
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SQL Azure
Ranking in Database as a Service
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Database as a Service category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.9%, down from 30.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQL Azure is 15.7%, down from 18.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Jay Vekaria - PeerSpot reviewer
May 29, 2023
A well-managed and stable service while also providing scalability
We use it in our organization since it is a managed database service. So we can manage our database within UAM My company decided to use the solution since it is a managed database service that provides control along with a UI for our databases. The performance insight is a valuable feature…
CO
Jun 22, 2021
Stable, easy to provision and administer, and natural progression to SQL Server
We are using it for business intelligence and analytics The ease of provisioning and administration is most valuable. It should have better profiling capabilities. Its price could also be lower. I have been using this solution for about two years. We haven't had any outages yet, so it is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The provisioning is much faster. You don't have to prepare hardware or install software. You just need to create an instance and you have a database."
"It is very easy to set up initially."
"Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys."
"The most valuable feature is that it is a fully managed database, where they handle most of the administrative tasks and leaves the users more time to concentrate on business."
"Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality."
"Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy."
"I found it to be a stable solution."
"The product is very, very easy to use."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It took less than one day for deployment."
"I am very happy with this solution; right now, I don't think there is anything I would change."
"The most valuable aspect of SQL Azure is the SQL language itself. It's open and everybody can use it at my company. Also, we thought in the beginning that the response time would be inadequate, but it's actually decent. It's much better than expected. Then again, I'm not a programmer, but that's what I hear from our development team."
"Great auto-scaling and security features."
"This solution offers high availability, and business continuity is in place."
"Database services and Active Directory related functions for this solution are good. Stable, scalable, and easy to install. Its technical support is good."
"One of the most valuable aspects is its seamless integration with Azure Data Factory."
"SQL Azure can integrate well with other Microsoft Windows services."
 

Cons

"When you are using it for the first time, it is a little bit hard to configure. The first-time configuration is not very easy. It should be easier to configure. Its installation should also be simpler. Currently, its installation is very complex. With SQL Server, we have access to the SQL Server analysis services and reporting services, but such services are not available with Amazon RDS."
"A lot of the features are disabled by default. The solution should enable more features. I understand this could cause challenges to management for many clients using RDS, however."
"It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service."
"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with Microsoft products. Our clients use the Microsoft Tally application server. We already tried to create a reputation from, for example, an on-premises environment from our client to Amazon RDS using Microsoft Tally server, and we couldn't do that because we didn't have a strong user in RDS. We couldn't create a reputation from an on-premises environment from the Microsoft Tally server to RDS. I think that it would be a good implementation, and it would help us with this case."
"One of the challenges of AWS RDS is that it doesn't support performance insight. So we need to write our own script or use third-party tools."
"The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution."
"Amazon RDS needs to have an overall dashboard where I can view all the tables in the form of pie charts and Gantt charts. The deployment is complex, and we would like to see automated scripts. It needs to incorporate performance insights."
"As a customer of Amazon RDS, you don't have super-user privileges, and that is the only drawback where improvements are required."
"We have a very small database running on SQL Azure. We have not been able to load bigger systems on it. It is still not something that is feasible. All our heavy-duty systems are on SAP, and it should have more compatibility with other vendors such as SAP. Its price can definitely be lower. It is pretty pricey."
"They should include more accessible functions for image tooling."
"The problem is the automated configuration."
"The product could be more competitive in terms of features, security, and scalability."
"If the product could support applications requiring an SQL server for installation, by using SQL Azure as a backend, that would be useful."
"Integration needs to be improved for this solution."
"The solution could be less expensive. They need to work on their pricing model."
"Service Broker should be added in Azure Cloud. Service Broker is currently available only in the on-premises version."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Amazon RDS is reasonable."
"The solution's pricing needs improvement."
"We are paying for a service license."
"The substantial initial credit and cost-effectiveness make Amazon an attractive option."
"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."
"Amazon RDS is cheaper compared to other tools."
"AWS is becoming pretty expensive because cheap or absolutely free services have become paid services. Amazon RDS is not an expensive product, but Amazon's ecosystem is becoming increasingly expensive."
"Amazon RDS is not a very expensive solution."
"Microsoft services are costly, which is the only problem we face. So, pricing is an area of improvement."
"It is reasonable."
"I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially."
"I find that they are relatively expensive, especially when compared to AWS, where the prices are notably lower."
"The solution is moderately expensive."
"The price could be slightly cheaper."
"I am not aware of the exact pricing, but our monthly bill for Azure is around 80,000. It is less expensive than using SQL Server. It has the pay-as-you-go model, and the charges are based on the usage."
"The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
University
6%
Educational Organization
65%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Government
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?
The product's installation phase is easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?
The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?
The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
What do you like most about SQL Azure?
The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQL Azure?
I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
What needs improvement with SQL Azure?
The product's pricing needs improvement.
 

Also Known As

RDS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmodo
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.