Amazon MSK vs Coralogix comparison

Read 13 Coralogix reviews

3,588 Views
144 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon MSK

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Coralogix and Amazon MSK are competing in the data streaming and logging landscape. Coralogix appears to have the upper hand in analytics and user-friendly management, while Amazon MSK excels in integration and scalability.

Features: Coralogix provides advanced real-time logging analytics, customizable dashboards, and a seamless integration with multiple data sources. Its tools are focused on proactive monitoring and swift anomaly detection. Amazon MSK offers scalability and reliability with native compatibility for Apache Kafka, appealing to organizations invested in AWS infrastructure. It emphasizes integration capabilities and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix could enhance its scalability to cater to larger organizations and improve deeper integration with AWS services. It might also refine data source compatibility for more extensive data sets. Amazon MSK could simplify its deployment process to reduce complexity and enhance user-friendliness for less technically proficient users. Additionally, MSK could improve its analytics capabilities and customer support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix offers a straightforward setup with customizable deployment models suited for diverse environments, accompanied by extensive support and personalized assistance. Amazon MSK’s deployment is complex due to its extensive feature set, but it benefits from comprehensive AWS documentation and support tools. Coralogix stands out for its simplicity and proactive support, while Amazon MSK relies on robust documentation for technically adept teams.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix presents competitive pricing with potential savings through efficient data management and analytics, offering substantial ROI for businesses seeking visibility and reduced operational overhead. Amazon MSK requires a more significant upfront investment due to its feature-rich platform but delivers high ROI through a comprehensive suite of capabilities, especially for organizations leveraging AWS services. Coralogix emphasizes cost efficiency, while Amazon MSK provides value through integration and native AWS benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix

December 2025

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MSK

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

6th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Coralogix

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), Log Management (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), API Management (15th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st), AI Observability (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Amazon MSK is 5.1%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Coralogix is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon MSK	5.1%
Coralogix	0.7%
Other	94.2%

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

SYED SHAAZ

Co-Founder & CTO at Photios AI

Improved data streaming and integration challenges prompt search for alternatives

The integration capabilities of Amazon MSK are not very flexible. If you have your own self-managed Kafka, that helps significantly because you can set up configurations. We are considering self-managed Kafka since our product is only one year old. The Kafka integrations are fine, but the configurations are an issue. The only issue with Amazon MSK that we are facing is the configurations. There are preset configurations and limited configurations that we can set for our unique use case. The product could improve by allowing us to set different configurations. I would also like to see Amazon MSK improve in the area of connectors. We are considering Confluent Cloud because they have many more connectors. They have KSQL DB and governance features. It is slightly costlier, but Confluent offers more flexibility with their connectors.

Read full review

Naveenkumar Lakshman

Presales Engineer at Crayon AS

Centralized monitoring has improved real-time issue tracking and reduced root cause analysis time

One of the best features that Coralogix offers is that it is integration friendly. I can seamlessly work with different cloud providers including AWS, Azure, and GCP. I can monitor Kubernetes or Docker platforms as well, and I can integrate with the DevOps chain including Jenkins and all infrastructure code, Terraform, or Ansible. Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool. I have the interface where I can use the drag-and-drop feature, and I can create different types of charts. Mainly, I have the line charts and time series ones that I generally use in many use cases, gauges, tables, pie charts, or markdown widgets. These are the ones generically available, and I can switch between the visualization types. I am getting the underlying query in that and can import and export dashboards built upon the JSON format. I can have my own APIs integrated with my dashboards as well, such as with Terraform, which is useful for scaling across my environments. Regarding root cause analysis, mainly what I can do is correlate across all of the layers because the main logs that I work on are storage-related, including CIFS, NFS, SAN traffic, and the metrics including storage, throughput, or VM resource usage. Being able to view logs, metrics, or traces available, I get all of these in one place, and I can do root cause analysis much quicker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MSK has contributed positively to our real-time analytics capabilities because Fortis's dashboards have dashboard health that needs to be maintained, user logs that need to be maintained, and usage tracking."

"The scalability and usability are quite remarkable."

"Amazon MSK's separation of concerns and ease of creating and deploying new features are highly valuable. It just requires to assign them to the topic, and then anyone who needs to consume these messages can do so directly from Amazon MSK. This separation of concerns makes it very convenient, especially for new feature development, as developers can easily access the messages they need without having to deal with complex server communications or protocol setups."

"I have Amazon MSK integrated with other AWS services such as S3 and Lambda."

"It provides installations, scaling, and other functionalities straight out of the box."

"It is a stable product."

"Amazon MSK has good integration because our team has been undergoing significant changes. Coupling it with MSK within AWS is helpful. We don't have to set up additionals or monitor external environments. This"

More Amazon MSK pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"In my experience, the best feature Coralogix offers is that the dashboard is pretty good."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

Cons

"The downside of Amazon MSK is that when I needed to make a small change in the MSK configuration, it wasn't possible. I had to remove and drop all the clusters and recreate them again, which is complicated in a production environment."

"It should be more flexible, integration-wise."

"Amazon MSK could improve on the features they offer. They are still lagging behind Confluence."

"The configuration seems a little complex and the documentation on the product is not available."

"The cost of using Amazon MSK is high, which is a significant disadvantage, as the increase in cloud costs by 50% to 60% does not justify the savings."

"One of the reasons why we prefer Kafka is because the support is a little bit difficult to manage with Amazon MSK."

"The only issue with Amazon MSK that we are facing is the configurations. There are preset configurations and limited configurations that we can set for our unique use case."

"It does not autoscale. Because if you do keep it manually when you add a note to the cluster and then you register it, then it is scalable, but the fact that you have to go and do it, I think, makes it, again, a bit of some operational overhead when managing the cluster."

More Amazon MSK cons

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

More Coralogix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you create a complete enterprise-driven architecture that is deployable on an enterprise scale, I would say that the prices of Amazon MSK and Confluent Platform become comparable."

"The price of Amazon MSK is less than some competitor solutions, such as Confluence."

"The platform has better pricing than one of its competitors."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MSK?

Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.

What needs improvement with Amazon MSK?

What is your primary use case for Amazon MSK?

We are recently working with Amazon MSK at Fortis, where we have multiple dashboards in our revenue intelligence platform. We are streaming data from different apps into those dashboards. The data ...

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

To monitor and manage costs associated with Coralogix, I analyze my trend, looking at how the data is being ingested. Generally, it is charged based on what we store, and therefore there are certai...

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

I think Coralogix can be improved with flexible dashboards. Creating specific views, such as saving a dev environment as a separate view rather than adding filters every time, would be great.

Azure Stream Analytics vs Amazon MSK

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Apache Flink vs Amazon MSK

Compared 13% of the time

Confluent vs Amazon MSK

Compared 11% of the time

Aiven Platform vs Amazon MSK

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Amazon MSK

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MSK Competitors

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 14% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Product Reports

Download Amazon MSK product report

Amazon MSK

January 2026

Download Coralogix product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka

No data available

Overview

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini