Amazon MSK vs Coralogix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
7,940 views|6,237 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Coralogix Logo
46 views|37 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MSK and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, it is very cost-effective based on the workflow.""MSK has a private network that's an out-of-box feature.""It offers good stability.""The most valuable feature of Amazon MSK is the integration.""Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.""It is a stable product."

More Amazon MSK Pros →

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it.""The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces.""The solution offers very good convenience filtering.""The solution is easy to use and to start with.""Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.""The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix Pros →

Cons
"Amazon MSK could improve on the features they offer. They are still lagging behind Confluence.""The configuration seems a little complex and the documentation on the product is not available.""It should be more flexible, integration-wise.""It does not autoscale. Because if you do keep it manually when you add a note to the cluster and then you register it, then it is scalable, but the fact that you have to go and do it, I think, makes it, again, a bit of some operational overhead when managing the cluster.""It would be really helpful if Amazon MSK could provide a single installation that covers all the servers.""The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET."

More Amazon MSK Cons →

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers.""The documentation of the tool could be improved""We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.""The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory.""It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription.""Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

More Coralogix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Amazon MSK is less than some competitor solutions, such as Confluence."
  • "The platform has better pricing than one of its competitors."
  • More Amazon MSK Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."
  • "The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."
  • "The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."
  • More Coralogix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.
    Top Answer:The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET. They… more »
    Top Answer:We use the software to facilitate building integrations between systems.
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to use and to start with.
    Top Answer:The pricing depends on our requirements. If you're going to use the bare minimum, then the pricing is quite cheap and is a good start for many companies. However, if you're going to do it full-scale… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory. Additionally, more advanced functionalities can be included in the next release.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    7,940
    Comparisons
    6,237
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    7.0
    11th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    46
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Datadog logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Grafana logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Sentry logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Elastic Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.

    Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

    Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MSK is ranked 6th in Streaming Analytics with 6 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 11th in Streaming Analytics with 7 reviews. Amazon MSK is rated 7.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon MSK writes "Efficient real-time transaction tracking but time-consuming installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". Amazon MSK is most compared with Confluent, Amazon Kinesis, Azure Stream Analytics, Google Cloud Dataflow and Aiven for Apache Kafka, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search. See our Amazon MSK vs. Coralogix report.

    See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.