We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"The tool's performance is good."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."
"Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."
"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"The ease of use could be better."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly."
"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."
"It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Macie is ranked 19th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention. See our Amazon Macie vs. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
