We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."It has valuable monitoring and insights features."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"The solution is easy-to-set up."
"It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"Amazon EKS can be used to implement and create clusters."
"I like the scalability they're currently providing. Integration was very easy. It was a good experience."
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"EKS has security features that you can't find in competing solutions."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"The dashboard needs to be more user-friendly."
"They could add logging features. At present, we use external tools to increase and decrease the number of instances."
"Setup depends on what kind of architecture you have"
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
Amazon EKS is ranked 15th in Container Security with 38 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco and Sysdig Secure.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.