In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within our landing zone. It forms a part of our landing zone.
Pricing varies based on the architecture and services utilized. AWS provides tools like a pricing calculator to manage costs. Serverless architecture can reduce costs, while services like Amazon ECS, if running 24/7, can incur more expenses.
The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.
Container Registry is a secure storage and management solution for container images, key for automating the Docker container lifecycle from development to production.Container Registry enables development teams to manage and deploy containers at scale. Offering integration with CI/CD pipelines, it supports efficient development workflows. By providing security features and version control, it streamlines the handling of containerized applications across environments.What are the essential...
In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within our landing zone. It forms a part of our landing zone.
Pricing varies based on the architecture and services utilized. AWS provides tools like a pricing calculator to manage costs. Serverless architecture can reduce costs, while services like Amazon ECS, if running 24/7, can incur more expenses.
I haven't explored setup costs a lot. So far, it's not very expensive to host images on ECR.
The price of Amazon ECR is cheap.
The pricing of ECR is average compared to its competitors.
The product is expensive.
The solution's pricing depends upon the region. The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US.
The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
Amazon ECR does not have a high cost.
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
The solution's price is reasonable compared to Google and Azure.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.