Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon Bedrock offers cost-efficient usage-based charges but unexpected fees may impact perceived returns despite reduced manual intervention.
Sentiment score
7.4
SAP S4HANA on AWS boosts performance, efficiency, and ROI, with payback in months and long-term financial benefits.
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon Bedrock's customer service is highly rated for efficiency and responsiveness, with strong support and documentation quality.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAP S4HANA on AWS support receives mixed reviews; AWS prompt, SAP varies, necessitating improvement and expertise due to complexity.
We are experiencing the fastest time ever to get things done with AI integrating into our work, regardless of where we are.
So, you always have to bridge the gap by presenting scenarios, getting recommendations, and testing or validating those assumptions.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon Bedrock excels in scalability using AWS, integrating well yet faces limitations like rate and token limits at hyperscale.
Sentiment score
7.8
SAP S4HANA on AWS provides scalable support for large enterprises, integrates well, but requires technical expertise for efficient scaling.
It is scalable on a truly global basis.
Amazon Bedrock is quite highly scalable, but there are some limitations they impose on the accounts, which could be an area for improvement.
It scales well with AWS Lambda, AWS Transcribe, and Polly.
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Amazon Bedrock is reliable and stable, handling workloads seamlessly, maintaining performance, and achieving high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
7.8
SAP S4HANA on AWS is praised for stability and reliability, though performance can vary with specific setups and configurations.
As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improvements in documentation, integration, pricing, UI, AI capabilities, and introduction of Amazon native models.
SAP S4HANA on AWS needs better integration, cost efficiency, user-friendly interfaces, improved support, scalability, and enhanced deployment resources.
In AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture.
If AWS provided methods, like five or six prompts that yield specific results, it would ease development.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.
Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Bedrock offers flexible, consumption-based pricing, cost-effective for experimentation, though enterprise models can be expensive.
SAP S4HANA on AWS is costly but offers value with flexibility, significant enterprise investment, and potential discounts.
Our cost is incredibly low, operating for a few hundred dollars a month in production.
One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs.
The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Bedrock offers secure, cost-effective AI model customization and seamless integration, enhancing performance and trust in deployments.
SAP S4HANA on AWS offers a user-friendly interface, real-time processing, scalability, AI integration, and cost-effective, high-availability hosting.
It has improved operational costs and efficiency significantly, saving money and enhancing the quality of operations.
The ability to make changes in the foundational model is valuable since different customers have specific needs, allowing customization.
Our encryption keys are managed through Bedrock ecosystem by our clients.
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.
It manages complexity in various industries such as banking, manufacturing, and trading.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (2nd)
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good security features for strengthened data protection
I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
AtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewer
Strong integration in manufacturing and enhances flexibility with useful workflow management
Installation is very straightforward, however, implementation takes years or months based on the project's size. In manufacturing, the requirement might go from ten to 12 people. If I'm a sales-oriented company, such as an FMCG or something else, then I might need around seven or eight people at the very minimum. It is not an easy task to migrate. If I'm moving from a different ERP to S/4HANA, I need a proper project that probably spans several months, with significant engagement from both the business side and the technical side. I need an opportunity partner on it. Processing to SCE S/4HANA takes a bit of effort.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing depends on the LLM model in use, such as the 1.2 Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ). Costs are based on the number of characters obtained in return. It follows a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) could add prompt engineering methods to its services. Currently, there are no prompt methods, so we have to experiment on our own. If AWS provided methods, like...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
We are using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) for generative AI-related tasks. We utilize Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ) LLM to obtain appropriate answers for user...
What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?
With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?
Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP S/4HANA on AWS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.