

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Centrally managing records has helped us automate legal retention policies and reduce physical storage costs by eighty percent, saving us in costs and protecting us from massive financial penalties associated with compliance failures.
Alfresco provides a significant return on investment by efficiently managing documents.
Now, we can work and share live documents; they can see the real-time changes being made, and we can even get on a meeting and work on the document at the same time.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, the collaboration, versioning control, and data accuracy improved, allowing us to finish the project in just one month or two instead of six.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, they can collaborate in a very fast way.
I would prefer a direct relationship with them, focusing on updating their products more like in an agile practice
Alfresco's technical support is very fast and professional.
The support team was very responsive and resolved my query within forty-five minutes, which was a good experience.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is in an end-of-support era, so there is very limited customer support available.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very responsive and proactive.
They got good results and everything is working, so it turned out okay.
Implementations needing to handle millions of documents may involve complex cluster setups requiring expert assistance.
However, if you are looking to expand into areas with more images and videos, the scalability is somewhat limited without a developer and customization.
We did not have any problem scaling Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.
For large organizations, I would recommend Sharepoint Online or cloud-based solutions as better options.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth efficiently.
Alfresco is definitely a stable and scalable solution.
The stability of Alfresco is rated highly as it hardly goes down.
Alfresco is generally a very stable and high-performance platform.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience.
It would be beneficial if Alfresco offers different options for document storage, such as databases or cloud solutions.
Being able to leverage something such as MongoDB, a NoSQL database as part of the architecture would be a big improvement to enable high volume in the hundreds of millions of documents.
Governance of this system is required. If you don't have proper governance, things can go wrong.
I would like to see more of AI's analytics and observations come into Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, particularly regarding user interface, speed, or integration with other tools.
Sometimes it would have been quicker to search outside of Microsoft or Sharepoint and use Google, or even find a YouTube video that explained how to do something, which should not be necessary for a Microsoft product that we pay for.
We can definitely improve the search feature, which should crawl every page and every list to retrieve data.
Since we obtained Alfresco through AWS Marketplace, we are billed for what we use.
The pricing of Alfresco starts at $100,000, which can be expensive for small projects.
Pricing is considered mid-range.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been transparent
This makes the record independent of the document, which is beneficial as documents often change, and it helps avoid continual updates to the registry.
Alfresco also provides automated lifecycle management that helps us enforce legal holds, retention schedules, and secure disposition of records, keeping the files secure and ensuring that our organization remains compliant with legal requirements.
It enabled users to find exactly what documents they were looking for in a timely fashion, as well as to export to patients and healthcare members what they needed to do for Medicaid, Medicare, or any other secondary insurance, including the documents they needed to fill out as well as prescriptions.
The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools.
The workflow feature specifically helped my team by not only improving efficiency but also impacting our costs, as it saved on printer, paper, and ink consumption while allowing managers to approve requests from anywhere at any time.
I am not sure how we would share some of these resources as easily with another solution, especially being able to control who can access what at different levels and who can edit which files, who can upload, and who can see different things.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Alfresco | 6.4% |
| Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 | 0.4% |
| Other | 93.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Alfresco offers integration with both cloud and on-premises systems, emphasizing document management, collaboration, and high customization potential. Key attributes include its open-source nature and strong API support, driving efficient content sharing and workflow management.
Alfresco stands out as a robust platform for managing content services, records, and business processes. It enables organizations to implement central repositories for document approval, integrating effectively with applications like SAP and DocuSign. Its extensible architecture, supported by active community involvement, allows customization to meet diverse requirements. Alfresco's scalability, combined with capabilities in metadata management, version control, and workflow automation, supports efficient operations in a paperless environment. Despite benefits, it faces challenges related to interface intuitiveness, document storage security, and integration complexities. Enhancements in AI capabilities and workflow digitalization would further optimize its use.
What are the key features of Alfresco?In specific industries, Alfresco is utilized for managing intricate content services, facilitating record-keeping processes, and establishing central document repositories. Enterprises integrate it with tools like SAP and DocuSign to automate document approvals and support collaboration, fostering efficiency in document management and reducing reliance on paper-based operations.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 features robust security, seamless Microsoft integration, and workflow automation, enhancing collaboration, file sharing, and document management.
Organizations leverage Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 for online data storage and efficient business process automation. It offers improved communication and secure file sharing through real-time collaboration and mobile access. While the platform increases productivity with version history and access control, areas such as offline functionality and performance enhancement need focus. The outdated user experience and limited browser support are aspects requiring attention.
What are the key features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7?In specific industries, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 is utilized for secure document management and collaboration. Manufacturing companies use it for managing complex workflows and storing files securely. In healthcare, it supports data consistency and real-time collaboration to ensure quality patient care.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.