Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

Software AG and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Software AG is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0, while erwin by Quest is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Software AG holds a 2.5% mindshare in AM, compared to erwin by Quest’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Read 3 Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management reviews

760 Views
519 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve by Quest

Read 19 erwin Evolve by Quest reviews

909 Views
561 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

erwin Evolve by Quest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Erwin Evolve by Quest and Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management are enterprise architecture solutions. Erwin Evolve has an advantage in pricing and support, while Alfabet offers more comprehensive features for advanced capabilities.

Features: Erwin Evolve includes business process modeling, data governance, and integration with Quest products, supporting effective architecture management with its streamlined approach. Alfabet provides risk management, financial modeling, and technology landscape visualization, suitable for large enterprises needing a wide range of tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Evolve allows straightforward deployment and offers responsive customer support for faster configuration. Alfabet, despite robust customer service, has a more complex deployment reflecting its extensive feature set, possibly extending deployment timelines.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Evolve offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to businesses seeking essential functionalities with a smoother ROI path. Alfabet requires a higher investment, offering greater long-term ROI due to its comprehensive features, beneficial for larger organizations with expansive needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve by Quest

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve by Quest is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

AlanJackson

Partner: Enterprise Strategy & Advisory at Wipro Limited

Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded

Alfabet is not just a technology tool, it's also a business tool. And if a decision's made without the business involved, then Alfabet will not be in a position to deliver anything more than support for enterprise architect drawings and solutions drawings. It has to be the business. If you do that, it works well. If you don't and I've had the experience where they haven't evolved a business, then it just becomes a tech tool that the business doesn't care about. The stigma of having an environment that was so delayed in the maintenance caused lots of finger-pointing within the organization of who was right and who was wrong. It took a considerable period of time to move people past that point to actually look at it as a business tool supported by the technology team. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Read full review

ScottLawson

Director IT Architecture at QAD

Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data.

We tried their collaborative web modeling and we used it with a few people but we tend to not use that piece. We tend to collaborate with the people and then my team of architects draws up the diagram using the modeling tool. We then iterate through those. I would like to use it, but it was a little clunky when they first rolled it out. Overall, it's more about the company having room for improvement. What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things. I hear them talking in the support forums and, when I talk to the representative, they say they're going to do a bunch of stuff but it seems the progress is slow. The changes they need to make are to take their old, legacy product, which we use, and focus a lot on it so they can transform it into a modern cloud tool so that we have fewer little pieces to deal with. They could also fix their security model. It's very confusing to get new people onto the tool and to make sure that your content isn't being exposed to the wrong people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

"We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts."

"You can use different kinds of diagrams to represent the architecture setting."

"By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"We use erwin Evolve to publish to the website. This allows us to enable publishing our website using parameterisation features. In a very fast, quick way, we can publish a table or chart onto a website."

"The most valuable features for us are impact analysis, where I can easily visualize the impact of change."

More erwin Evolve by Quest pros

Cons

"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines."

"We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

"The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"They need to develop Evolve's user experience. For example, MEGA has a useful client view that helps with impact analysis. MEGA provides information about the processes, services, infrastructure, and portfolio of applications in one central view. It lets you see the periphery and relationships among components. This view is impressive, and Evolve doesn't have it."

"Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product."

"What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

"I feel that the UML drawing capability needs to be improved."

More erwin Evolve by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

The ability for Alfabet to acknowledge use cases that are specifically business-based and not technology-based and better integrate those process designs across the spectrum could be improved. The ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

I work for a systems integrator and we are end users. Organizations using this product are enterprise-size, our largest customer has 30,000 users. One customer had use cases built on sourcing raw m...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Evolve?

I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Evolve by Quest?

We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Evolve by Quest?

erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses.

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 35% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 33% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 16% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 26% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 21% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

ARIS BPA vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

More erwin Evolve by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

March 2025

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management report

Download Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Download erwin Evolve by Quest product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Software AG

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

erwin by Quest

Sample Customers

Metro Bank, Credit Suisse

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve by Quest report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.