More Akamai Web Application Protector Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Akamai Web Application Protector is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while Signal Sciences is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Akamai Web Application Protector is rated 7.0, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Akamai Web Application Protector writes "Effective, feature-rich, and reliable, but they don't provide a free tier like Cloudflare". On the other hand, Akamai Web Application Protector is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender, Azure Front Door and NGINX App Protect, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Azure Web Application Firewall, Wallarm NG WAF and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.