We performed a comparison between Airtable and JIRA Portfolio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Airtable's ability to bring people from different teams and geographies together into say a master calendar, with complete control over who sees what when and in what format, is highly beneficial for communications organizations."
"The solution makes it easy to structure data into simple data tables."
"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."
"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."
"The relations and multiple-choice options are the most valuable features. For example, if I have one client but multiple projects in the same client, it's much easier to map it with Airtable than if I use a Google Sheet. The relationship between interfaces is a key feature that I use very often."
"Airtable stands out for its exceptional user-friendliness, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Its intuitive navigation ensures a smooth experience, allowing users to easily explore and comprehend its functionalities. Moreover, Airtable offers powerful automation capabilities that enhance efficiency. One particularly advantageous aspect is the seamless linking of databases, enabling the effortless creation of relational databases. Overall, this feature has proven to be immensely valuable and has been the primary focus of my usage."
"I am impressed with the product's user interface and integrations. It helps me to ship products very fast."
"The sorting of the data is the best feature of Airtable. In a Google sheet I have to insert some data and Airtable provides the default option of doing it automatically."
"The most valuable feature is that it fits very well into an agile framework, and it is especially helpful with the planning aspects."
"I think the solution's most important and valuable feature is its ability to track the issues."
"The initial setup is simple."
"With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard where we can see all of our projects and apply filters to shortlist those projects."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
"Portfolio's best feature is integration with other JIRA products."
"Having an option to view dependencies between projects and teams is great."
"The template library is huge. I have a few suggestions with respect to that. But to complete automation, I think a bit more documentation around that would be really helpful because there are a lot of features in that which common people explore them less"
"The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces."
"Airtable needs improvement with the loading speed. It takes a lot of time to load."
"The user interface should be more intuitive."
"Reporting, specifically anything involving exports, could be improved."
"They should allow us to duplicate the data to share it with others."
"The product's AI feature needs improvement."
"It'd be nice if the record limit of 50,000 record limit per base on pro accounts were substantially higher."
"Another thing could be to have an easy way to manage the Portfolio and have more ways to share and to show graphics and reports"
"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."
"Requires some effort to insert functionalities and that could be simplified."
"The solution's look and feel could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly."
"We are using the on-premise deployment, but it is slower and not as easy to manage as the cloud version."
"Portfolio is easy to scale, but we've had some difficulties with it regarding compliance and support."
"JIRA and Confluence must be linked automatically."
"This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing."
Airtable is ranked 11th in Project Management Software with 11 reviews while JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews. Airtable is rated 8.8, while JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Airtable writes "An ERP tool for project tracking with continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". Airtable is most compared with Spreadsheet.com, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Project, whereas JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Airtable vs. JIRA Portfolio report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
