Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Airtable vs Changelogfy comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Airtable
Ranking in Product Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Project Management Software (17th)
Changelogfy
Ranking in Product Management Software
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Product Management Software category, the mindshare of Airtable is 16.7%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Changelogfy is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Management Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Airtable16.7%
Changelogfy1.4%
Other81.9%
Product Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Favour Emosivbe - PeerSpot reviewer
Has required stronger collaboration features while still supporting complex project workflows
The best features in Airtable include the flexibility and the fact that I could create relational databases. Before I started using Airtable, I was using Excel which didn't offer these capabilities. The ability to create relationships between tables and see through what's working in other departments is great for me. I can do scripting and work on large data sets on Airtable. It makes it easy for me, as working on those data sets on Excel tends to slow me down, but on Airtable, it's much faster. I can integrate Airtable with other platforms; aside from the native integration where I can send notifications to Slack teams and messages to Gmail, I can also connect with Make.com to share data. The interface on Airtable is exceptional. Working for my clients, when a client didn't want access given to all teams, we structured that on the interface and the different teams got different access to different tables. Airtable's rich field types help in organizing complex data for my team. The advanced field types work exceptionally with features such as linking records together. I can link records from other tables and see what's happening, use the lookup field, the roll-up field, and the count field to see what's occurring in other departments and generate insights. Unlike other CRMs, data cannot enter if it's not properly structured. If I want to input an email and it's not valid, it won't allow it because it expects the data to be structured appropriately.
Use Changelogfy?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Educational Organization
8%
Construction Company
8%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airtable?
I would love them to improve by adding tutorials, especially for scripting, and provide good documentation. We need comprehensive documentation for Airtable. If they show step-by-step guides for au...
What is your primary use case for Airtable?
I use Airtable as a database to store information and perform automation with scripting. I use Airtable to get leads from my Pipedrive account to store in the Airtable base. I use it to track speed...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cole Haan, Expedia, BuzzFeed, Medium, Shopify, Box, JetBlue
* **Atlassian** * **Google** * **Microsoft** * **Amazon** * **Facebook** * **Netflix** * **Spotify** * **Uber** * **Tesla** * **LinkedIn** * **Adobe** * **SAP** * **Oracle** * **IBM** * **McKinsey** * **Bain & Company** * **Boston Consulting Group** * **KPMG** * **EY** * **Deloitte** * **PwC** * **Accenture** * **Cisco** * **VMware** * **Red Hat** * **SUSE** * **Canonical** * **Docker** * **Kubernetes** * **Terraform** * **Ansible**