We performed a comparison between ADONIS and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It's a very complete solution."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"It is a stable solution."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The best part of Pega, for me, is that they let you reuse a lot of the aspects in the product."
"The technical support of Pega BPM is very good."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful."
"I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and BIC Platform , whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our ADONIS vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.