ADOIT vs Planview Portfolios comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BOC Group and Planview are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BOC Group is ranked #18, while Planview is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. BOC Group holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Planview’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Planview users who would recommend it.

ADOIT

Read 2 ADOIT reviews

1,468 Views
1,468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

8,735 Views
2,009 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

ADOIT

Planview Portfolios

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Planview Portfolios and ADOIT compete in the portfolio and enterprise architecture management domain, with Planview often favored for cost-effectiveness and support services, while ADOIT offers advanced features appealing to businesses prioritizing robust functionality.

Features: Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive project tracking, reporting tools, and enhanced project visibility, improving planning efficiency. ADOIT provides sophisticated enterprise architecture modeling, detailed structural analysis, and decision-making insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios has a straightforward deployment process complemented by excellent customer support, ensuring smooth implementation. ADOIT provides a cloud-based deployment model simplifying integration into IT ecosystems, highlighting its flexible deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios is known for competitive pricing, emphasizing cost management and project efficiency, offering substantial ROI through optimized resource allocation. ADOIT, initially more expensive, delivers value through deep analysis capabilities, justifying investment for organizations focusing on architecture management.

To learn more, read our detailed ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADOIT

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of ADOIT is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 2.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Portfolios	2.8%
ADOIT	2.0%
Other	95.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1289670

Solution Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

A good tool that's great for modelling and building heat maps

During the first 18 months, for at least three months, we tried to get some training. We started working on the modeling part and we are still evolving in this tool. There are a few recommendations that have been put to the vendor, and we've gotten some answers and the team is evolving the tool in this space. I don't have anything to complain about right now, although there are a few things that we are discussing with the team who is connecting with the vendor to get that resolved. Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated. We need to know how the enterprise-level metadata and master data could be managed in this tool. There are multiple open questions.

Read full review

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This particular product would be really helpful to model the architecture at an enterprise level."

"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs."

"We can easily see which functions are overcapacity. Before, we did not have visibility into that."

"The most valuable features are the control and visibility that you have for portfolio management in terms of projects and capacity planning for resources along with strategies and outcomes, etc. It's so easy to access information for sharing analytics and reporting."

"The portfolio and technology management are well built."

"Troux has an easily extensible meta model and UI which other tools don't have."

"Planview has helped connect funding and strategic outcomes with work execution. That is the key use that we have for it. We use it to validate the work that we're doing and the funding that we need. The difference between the previous version and current version for us would be the ICPM and the way it gives us different scenarios. We can go in and build that out."

"It gives you the ability to see across a portfolio the cost and resource demands, helping ensure that we're working on the right things with the right amount of resources and giving us visibility into future demand to help us plan for resourcing."

"Planview has helped connect funding and strategic outcomes with work execution because we utilize the strategic module within Enterprise One to help with that work."

"Enterprise One provides a variety of types of resource assignments for assigning work to people. It's very easy and straightforward to configure these assignments. Planview allows us to see the entire workforce. We can see where our skill sets of people are, what they're working on, and allows us to make informed business decisions based on priority."

More Planview Portfolios pros

Cons

"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system."

"Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated."

"Visualization and reporting areas could use improvements by having canned reports."

"We've been using it for a while, so it's about maturity. It's about being able to build out things in Agile groups and teams and some of that. Then really trying to drive into the direction of Lean Portfolio Management and more Agile program management, I think is where we're heading."

"The technical people are very competent, but there is so much turnover in the people that we talk to, and that's frustrating. They will say, "We can make this work." Suddenly, that guy has left, and we have no one. Then, we have to start all over."

"I would like to be able to integrate with Oracle to supplement what we're currently doing with reporting."

"The solution is stable. However, it's so robust, there's so much data, that it has the tendency to lag."

"The configuration for the front-end user can be a little antiquated and it needs a facelift."

"Support is still a challenge. We find it challenging more due to the responsiveness and getting a case or ticket assigned to an analyst. That's what I was just doing. I was following up on an email that we opened last week. We haven't heard anything, so following up on that."

"Many times, we've had people give us attitude, delays in response, or just a lack of interest."

More Planview Portfolios cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use ADOIT's open-source version."

"When we went through that process, I believe it is competitive with others on the market. However, there are less expensive options available. It's a more premium offering at a higher price."

"I don't know about the actual pricing. I have not come across any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Planview is a little pricey. From a licensing perspective, for just a simple timesheet user who does nothing in the system but reports time, the licensing is a little pricey, but you have to look at it from what it is that you get. We have 6,000 users, and I don't manage the system at all. I just have to do add them to the system. The servers, maintenance, OS levels, security patching for the OS, and all other things are not something that we maintain. So, you have to look at it from an operational perspective. It is not just the product itself. A holistic view has to be taken when you look at the product and how you're going to support it. I would have to hire an entire operation staff to bring it in-house, and at the end of the day, that might cost me more."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."

"I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore."

"I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen."

"In the time that I've used it, we've doubled up the amount of dollars on our intended projects."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs ADOIT

Compared 17% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs ADOIT

Compared 15% of the time

Ardoq vs ADOIT

Compared 10% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs ADOIT

Compared 8% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs ADOIT

Compared 6% of the time

More ADOIT Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

September 2026

Download ADOIT product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

September 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Also Known As

No data available

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

Overview

ADOIT provides a comprehensive framework for enterprise architecture management, supporting strategic optimization and IT asset planning. It assists organizations in aligning business goals with IT strategies, enhancing decision-making processes.

ADOIT stands out as a potent tool for enhancing enterprise architecture with its emphasis on structured collaboration, precise documentation, and thorough analysis. Users find it effective for streamlining communications across teams, ensuring a cohesive approach to managing resources. The platform offers an intuitive interface tailored for creating detailed architectural models, thus facilitating efficient data management and strategic planning. It supports system integrations, allowing for seamless information flow and enabling businesses to achieve their architecture goals efficiently.

What are the key features of ADOIT?

Collaborative Modeling: Enables team collaboration in creating and updating models to ensure consistency.
Performance Analytics: Offers tools for assessing system performance and operational efficiency.
Flexible Integration: Smooth integration with existing IT systems for seamless workflow.
Centralized Repository: Provides a central location for storing and managing architecture data.
Process Optimization: Tools assist in identifying and improving inefficiencies in business processes.

What benefits should you evaluate in ADOIT reviews?

Enhanced Strategic Planning: Insights and tools that support long-term business strategy formulation.
Cost Efficiency: Identifies areas to reduce costs and maximize resource use.
Improved Communication: Facilitates better communication within organizations.
Risk Management: Tools to foresee and manage potential business risks effectively.
Data-driven Decisions: Provides data analytics for informed decision-making.

In industries like finance and healthcare, ADOIT is used to integrate IT and business processes, improving efficiency. For example, banks employ ADOIT to align their IT infrastructure with regulatory requirements. In healthcare, it aids in digital transformation by optimizing IT resource allocation and management.

BOC Group

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

September 2026

Free Report: ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

Find out what your peers are saying about ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.