Adobe Workfront vs Cloudinary comparison

Read 16 Cloudinary reviews

196 Views
32 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Adobe Workfront and Cloudinary compete in work and media management categories. Adobe Workfront shows an advantage in project management and workflow integration, while Cloudinary offers vital features for media asset management, which justifies its cost.

Features: Adobe Workfront offers task management, project tracking, and real-time collaboration features. It provides comprehensive project workflows and flexibility in task management. Cloudinary is strong in media management, providing automated image optimization, media storage, and powerful delivery integrations. Its features support seamless media management and transformation.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could enhance its user interface responsiveness, minimize implementation complexity, and expand integration capabilities with external tools. Cloudinary can improve in documentation clarity, expand support for more complex use cases, and provide more robust analytics tools to track media usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront offers robust deployment options, extensive training resources, and a supportive community to facilitate seamless integration. Cloudinary provides streamlined deployment, strong technical support, and efficient media management assistance. Adobe Workfront is noted for its comprehensive onboarding, whereas Cloudinary is appreciated for efficient deployment and responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's setup cost is higher, but its comprehensive features promise a substantial ROI by optimizing workflows and improving productivity. Cloudinary offers flexible pricing models with tiered packages to accommodate different needs, ensuring good ROI for digital media management-focused companies. Adobe Workfront enhances organizational efficiency value, while Cloudinary provides a cost-effective digital asset handling solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Cloudinary Report (Updated: April 2025).

Adobe Workfront vs. Cloudinary

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (6th)

Cloudinary

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

Josue BYIRINGIRO

ATLP Technical Mentor at Andela

Saves time and resources and has a clear dashboard

I like the tool best because it's straightforward and doesn't have too many complicated options like AWS. The dashboard is clear - you create a directory, get credentials, and then use those in your Node.js or Java application to access resources. With AWS, you have to consider many things, like bucket policies and user permissions. It doesn't have these complications. Everything on Cloudinary is clearer than other platforms I've seen. It is very easy to use. It's easier than the AWS platforms I've seen. Even general developers can use it, while AWS needs more experience. The solution saves time and resources in several ways. It's easy to get started with, saving time from the beginning. You can implement file uploads in about thirty minutes without complications. The SDK and APIs provided to access their resources are simple and not complicated. Cloudinary is also a popular platform with good documentation and community support, making it easy to find solutions to problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

"Adobe Workfront has been stable in my experience, and I would rate its stability as an eight out of ten."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"Instead of following everything on email, business users can track everything on Adobe Workfront when the other systems are integrated with it."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"As a developer, I find Cloudinary valuable because it provides many opportunities for building applications. For example, I recently created an AI application that can read images and automatically generate captions, which helps in describing images or videos without manual input. Cloudinary's APIs support this functionality and enhance my development process. One of the most beneficial features of Cloudinary is its asset management capabilities. I can tag and categorize images and videos based on their content, such as tagging videos where a person is wearing glasses. This helps in organizing and managing media effectively. I have experimented with Cloudinary's automation capabilities, but I am still learning and haven't fully explored its potential. Currently, I want to use Cloudinary to improve user engagement with my videos, such as tracking who is viewing and interacting with my media. This is a feature I plan to explore more in the future."

"I like its ease of implementation. I can easily call the API into my platform and use it to upload images from the machine to the server."

"Unlike Firebase Storage, Cloudinary handles media-specific tasks like re-encoding uploads. For example, when users upload a video from an Apple device, it's often encoded in a proprietary Apple codec."

"I can create folders in the Cloudinary interface using the front end, allowing me to store profile pictures, post pictures, cover pictures, and other media files."

"Cloudinary is very easy to use, especially for users or for developers."

"The most valuable features of the solution revolve around image storage."

"The tool's support team is very prompt."

"I use the solution for posting images."

More Cloudinary pros

Cons

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker."

"Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"It blocked our account, prevented us from uploading files, and showed a message about file adjustments."

"When you open the product's management console, it can just be a little bit overwhelming at first until you figure it out."

"The user interface of Cloudinary needs improvement."

"I haven't really thought about what improvements I’d like to see in Cloudinary recently. One thing that comes to mind is the capability for hosting very large video files, similar to platforms like YouTube. Cloudinary is not as widely known for video uploads as other platforms, and it would be great if it had a larger user base for this purpose. Apart from marketing and video uploading, I haven't identified specific features or functionalities that need improvement. It’s been a while since I actively used Cloudinary, and I’m just starting to get back into it. Once I’m more familiar with it again, I’ll have a better idea of any gaps or areas for enhancement. I’ll need to think more about this and might provide feedback later."

"For non-technical users, the initial setup could be made easier."

"Cloudinary's first paid plan is quite expensive, around one hundred dollars, which is more expensive than competitors like Dropbox"

"There are some things the product can improve in its UI."

"I believe there is some scope for improvement in areas like the dashboard, specifically the user dashboard and the browser where you can navigate the platform."

More Cloudinary cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"I have not used the product's paid subscription, as the free tier is sufficient for most users."

"From what I've used, it's actually cheap compared to other options like AWS."

"For us, the price is okay."

"I use the free plan, and that is enough for one or two websites. Though I felt that the product price is reasonable, I don't have any price details of any tools to help me make comparisons."

"If you are just starting out, the tool is actually free. You don't have to pay any fee, except if you have a large volume of files and documents you want to host."

"It is a free tool."

"The tool's pricing is very high."

"The product's free tier licensing plan is beneficial for individual developers to learn about its functionality."

More Cloudinary pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

58%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?

I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

What needs improvement with Workfront?

Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudinary?

I did not research Cloudinary's pricing, as I am using it for free. In the free service, it performs well.

What needs improvement with Cloudinary?

The UI needs improvement because it has become quite messy recently, making it difficult to locate the media library and images. Additionally, the initial setup process is complex due to the numero...

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudinary?

I would advise new users to read the documentation thoroughly to understand how to upload and store images effectively. For those using Cloudinary for the first time, be prepared for a learning cur...

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

Smartsheet vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 12% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Bynder vs Cloudinary

Compared 100% of the time

More Cloudinary Competitors

Product Reports

Adobe Workfront

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Download Cloudinary product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Adobe

Cloudinary provides a comprehensive API for image transformation, offering easy integration and a user-friendly interface. With automated asset optimization and robust media management, it enables seamless image storage and retrieval, making it a preferred choice for websites and applications.

Cloudinary is a leading platform in image management, featuring tools for image transformation, storage, and hosting. Its user-centric design simplifies processes like automated image optimization and media validation. Users benefit from a versatile CDN and a generous free tier, facilitating efficient development and deployment. The ability to handle image uploads and retrievals without complex configurations aids in quick time to market, while intuitive search and manageable media organization enhance user experience. Despite its strengths, users call for improvements in user-friendliness, API functionality, and clearer documentation. Pricing remains a concern, and additional advanced AI capabilities for image generation are desired. There's interest in better video hosting and integration with existing storage solutions.

What features does Cloudinary offer?

API for Image Transformation: Offers broad capabilities for customizing images.
Automated Asset Optimization: Ensures images are delivered in optimal formats.
Media Validation: Verifies media integrity and quality.
Intuitive Search: Allows easy retrieval of media assets.
CDN Power: Boosts content delivery speed globally.

What benefits do users find in Cloudinary?

Seamless Development: Facilitates quick development and deployment.
Efficient Image Management: Simplifies image storage and retrieval.
User-Friendly Interface: Aids in easy platform navigation.
Time-Saving Processes: Reduces time in image handling and delivery.

Cloudinary finds applications across sectors such as e-commerce, where image optimization for different devices significantly enhances user experience. In the web and app development fields, it enables automated management of image sizes and formats, supporting functions like user uploads and profile picture handling. Organizations utilize its media management capabilities for storing and handling documents, videos, and other assets. The API integration streamlines backend operations, making it an appealing choice for developers in diverse industries.

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Information Not Available

Adobe Workfront vs. Cloudinary