Acunetix vs GitHub comparison

Read 95 GitHub reviews

3,385 Views
2,065 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Acunetix and GitHub both operate in the domain of software development and security, with Acunetix focusing on security testing and GitHub on source code management. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its seamless collaboration features and integration capacities.

Features: Acunetix is esteemed for fast, accurate vulnerability detection with advanced security testing capabilities that minimize false positives. Its ability to record login sessions and detailed reporting is remarkable. GitHub excels in source code management, offering intuitive branching, merging capabilities, and robust version control. The integration flexibility with DevOps tools and project management features enhance its appeal.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs to enhance IAS features, report customization, and mobile app support. Reducing false positives and improving scan speeds are recommended. For GitHub, users suggest better search functionality, integration with project management tools, and enhanced security features. A user-friendly interface and improved management of large files are also needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers flexible deployment with on-premises and hybrid cloud options but could improve with 24/7 support availability. GitHub simplifies deployment with its public cloud infrastructure, but improving management of user accounts and licenses could enhance customer service. Both products have responsive support teams but can improve their customer service processes.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix faces competitive pricing challenges but provides ROI through reduced vulnerability risks. GitHub offers cost-effective solutions with free public repositories and reasonable pricing for private ones, especially valuable for small teams. ROI is reflected in collaboration efficiency and code management simplicity.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. GitHub Report (Updated: September 2025).

Download the complete report

Acunetix vs. GitHub

September 2025

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

Acunetix enhances security, reduces reliance on testers, lowers costs, and improves application security, offering strong ROI in budget discussions.

Sentiment score

5.6

GitHub provides efficient code management, cost benefits, secure code, and organizational advantages, enhancing market delivery and user experience.

It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

Acunetix customer service is responsive but not 24/7, with mixed reviews on support speed and issue resolution.

Sentiment score

6.2

Users primarily rely on community resources for support, but some desire quicker access to GitHub's technical support.

The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

The technical support from Acunetix is quite good

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.8

Acunetix offers scalable, flexible scanning for varying environments, with licensing and performance as key factors impacting scalability.

Sentiment score

7.9

GitHub efficiently supports global teams with scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring performance and stability for diverse user and project sizes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at Boxpeg

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Acunetix boasts remarkable stability with minimal maintenance, reliable performance, consistent results, and few bugs or disruptions reported.

Sentiment score

8.8

GitHub is stable, supports over 1,000 users effectively, with transparency and reliable updates appreciated, despite minor issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Acunetix users seek improvements in IAST, database, authentication, pricing, scan limits, mobile support, tool integration, and report customization.

GitHub needs improved security, integration, AI enhancements, UI/UX, search, docs, automation, and support for better user experience.

Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

The support program was helpful in addressing it.

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Setup Cost

Acunetix pricing is considered expensive, ranging $3,000-$500,000, influenced by domains and features, requiring careful evaluation.

GitHub provides cost-effective subscription options with a free basic version, ideal for public use, and competitive pricing for enterprises.

We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

Valuable Features

Acunetix provides efficient vulnerability scanning with integration capabilities, accurate reporting, and is user-friendly, scalable, and low-maintenance for teams.

GitHub offers robust community support, security, version control, integration with DevOps tools, and flexibility for distributed teams.

The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.

For more quotes and insights, download the Acunetix report

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th), Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.0%
Acunetix	2.5%
Other	96.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is automated scanning and detection of security vulnerabilities in web applications, websites, and APIs.

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

GitHub is very stable for me with no performance issues.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Acunetix product report

Acunetix

October 2025

Download GitHub product report

September 2025

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent