Acunetix vs GitHub comparison

Acunetix and GitHub compete in the application and code security arena, each excelling in different aspects. Acunetix has an edge with its advanced IAST module for detailed vulnerability detection, while GitHub is strong in source code management and collaboration.

Features: Acunetix includes IAST for in-depth analysis, scheduling scans, high-speed scanning, and detailed vulnerability reporting. It also offers low false positive rates and adaptability across different platforms. GitHub provides tools for branches, merges, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, code security, and social coding.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs enhancements in its IAST tool, false positive accuracy, and licensing model, as well as better integration with mobile environments and configuration edits. GitHub could improve its project management integration, conflict resolution, and support for large file uploads, alongside enhancing security and repository navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, while GitHub is mainly cloud-based, allowing both public and hybrid cloud flexibility. Acunetix has generally responsive technical support but with room for faster response times. GitHub's support comes from its robust community and extensive online resources, lacking direct support.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's increased pricing has lessened its initial competitiveness, though its ROI is evident through enhanced security features. GitHub provides better cost efficiency with its open-source model and low-cost enterprise solutions, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations.