

Acunetix and GitHub operate in web security and source code management categories, respectively. GitHub seems to have the upper hand with its broad user appeal due to comprehensive source management tools.
Features: Acunetix offers vulnerability scanning, scheduling scans, and detailed reporting. It integrates well into web security, providing scalability and ease of setup. GitHub offers collaboration through branching and merging capabilities, advanced security features, and integration with CI/CD tools, making it user-friendly for DevOps and team projects.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance false positive handling, manual vulnerability replication, and mobile app scanning. GitHub might improve its UI experience, security features, and team account management process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix prioritizes On-premises and Hybrid Cloud deployments; however, users report slower support response times. GitHub focuses on Public Cloud deployment, offering better accessibility and responsive support, though its onboarding process could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is perceived as expensive due to domain-based pricing, yet justifies the cost by reducing manual testing. GitHub provides cost-effective solutions with user-based pricing models, aided by its open-source nature and flexibility in premium options.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
Acunetix has helped reduce the time spent on manual security reviews and vulnerability identification, catching potential issues early in the deployment and development cycle.
GitHub delivers a strong ROI by improving developer productivity, accelerating software delivery, and reducing manual effort.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Our development team can raise support tickets for repository access issues, billing concerns, and CI/CD workflow problems.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Acunetix scales effectively for growing web application security testing needs.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
GitHub is generally very stable and reliable, making it more scalable for larger projects.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
Common challenges in GitHub include merge conflicts, branch management complexity, permission governance, and troubleshooting automation workflows.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
The pull request facility for code review.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| GitHub | 2.0% |
| Acunetix | 2.4% |
| Other | 95.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.
What are Acunetix's main features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.
GitHub is a platform that enhances collaboration and version control among developers, utilizing robust integration tools and features suitable for distributed teams. Its capabilities cater to diverse coding and project workflows, supporting effective team contributions and project deployments.
GitHub efficiently manages code repositories, facilitating seamless collaboration in distributed environments. It incorporates features beneficial for continuous integration and continuous deployment with tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Recognized for its code-sharing, security, and branch management capabilities, GitHub serves as a versatile development hub. However, there's room for enhancement in project management, testing, and AI integration, with users expressing a need for better documentation, reporting, and enhanced user experience through improved automation and interface simplification.
What features make GitHub essential?GitHub is implemented widely in software development industries, supporting teams that require centralized platforms for code management. It is crucial for maintaining code integrity and facilitating developer communication. Industries rely on it for integrating tools essential for their CI/CD pipelines, accelerating project timelines, and organizing development tasks through collaborative workflows.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.