Acunetix vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Acunetix and GitHub compete in the application and code security arena, each excelling in different aspects. Acunetix has an edge with its advanced IAST module for detailed vulnerability detection, while GitHub is strong in source code management and collaboration.

Features: Acunetix includes IAST for in-depth analysis, scheduling scans, high-speed scanning, and detailed vulnerability reporting. It also offers low false positive rates and adaptability across different platforms. GitHub provides tools for branches, merges, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, code security, and social coding.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs enhancements in its IAST tool, false positive accuracy, and licensing model, as well as better integration with mobile environments and configuration edits. GitHub could improve its project management integration, conflict resolution, and support for large file uploads, alongside enhancing security and repository navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, while GitHub is mainly cloud-based, allowing both public and hybrid cloud flexibility. Acunetix has generally responsive technical support but with room for faster response times. GitHub's support comes from its robust community and extensive online resources, lacking direct support.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's increased pricing has lessened its initial competitiveness, though its ROI is evident through enhanced security features. GitHub provides better cost efficiency with its open-source model and low-cost enterprise solutions, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Acunetix vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

More Acunetix pros

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"The solution provides good customization and support."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

More Acunetix cons

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

"Github needs more storage."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

"The merging features can be improved."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Acunetix

Download Acunetix product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Acunetix vs. GitHub