Nolio Release Automation streamlines deployment processes with a versatile GUI supporting both technical and non-technical users. The platform integrates with tools such as Jenkins and ServiceNow, enhancing release management efficiency while supporting diverse operating systems.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Nolio Release Automation | 2.0% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 28.6% |
| GitLab | 27.4% |
| Other | 42.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Release Automation | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs GitLab | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | 4.2 | 27.4% | 97% | 91 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 28.6% | 95% | 137 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 55 |
Nolio Release Automation provides a flexible platform for workflow creation without programming. It offers pre-built action packs and zero-code deployment design to streamline deployments, reducing release times significantly. While the integration with modern tools could improve and the documentation lacks depth, Nolio nonetheless centralizes production deployment activities and provides critical infrastructure for DevOps teams. Despite needing better scalability and process version control, organizations continue using the platform for virtual services and to navigate dependencies due to Broadcom's support limitations.
What are the key features of Nolio Release Automation?Nolio Release Automation is implemented across industries to manage and deploy web applications and data systems efficiently. Companies leverage its capabilities for virtual service offerings, minimizing vendor dependency and associated costs. The platform serves as a central deployment tool for production environments, with updates from version 6.6 to 6.9 managed by DevOps teams despite limitations in support and scalability.
Nolio Release Automation was previously known as CA Release Automation.
CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco.
Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital | 5.0 | I've used Nolio Release Automation extensively for three years; it's user-friendly, scalable, and effective for deployments, though its market presence is limited. The new 6.9 version offers improved performance, integration, and support over the older 6.6 version. |
| DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital | 4.0 | I primarily use Nolio Release Automation for production deployments, including web apps. Its architecture and user-friendly GUI are valuable, but it lacks learning materials for beginners. I've used OpenShift and IBM UrbanCode Deploy, but Nolio offers distinct advantages. |
| Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I find Nolio's graphical flow view valuable, and its setup was easy. It's stable and scalable, but I wish for better Kubernetes, cloud, and Active Directory support, plus improved parameter handling. I rate it 6/10. |
| CA Lisa Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I find this solution essential for virtualizing services, especially liking its CA Application Insight. While configuration is complex, it's very stable and scalable. I highly recommend this great tool, despite the difficult setup, rating it 9/10. |
| Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | CA Release Automation improved our deployment speed but had performance issues and painful upgrades. It's stable, but CA isn't investing in it, pushing Automic instead. I wouldn't recommend it for new investment due to future support concerns, despite its current functionality. |
| Tech Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I recommend CA Release Automation. Its easy GUI and stability make our automated deployments standardized and error-free. Setup was straightforward, and support is good. My only suggestion: broader automation capabilities. |
| SQA Manager at a tech services company | 4.5 | I found this tool exceptional for graphical workflow design and managing large, complex deployments across diverse environments. It’s scalable and offers good support, but its high cost and current ad-hoc integration for new technologies are drawbacks. |
| Manager - IT at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I found built-in action packs valuable for auto-deployment and rollbacks. However, the product is expensive and requires agents on all servers. Stability issues with agents disconnecting weekly were a concern, despite good customer support. |