OpenText UFT Digital Lab Reviews

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible.

It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

There are various use cases, each tailored to the specific needs of our customers. When we consider Application Lifecycle Management (ALM), the use case significantly differs from Unified Functional Testing (UFT). Our primary objective is to assist customers in optimizing their software development life cycles. This involves facilitating decisions based on platform usage and the data entities they input into the system. We help them link these components, conduct automated functional and performance testing, and ultimately provide a definitive decision-making process. The goal is to ensure that when a customer is ready to launch a product or software, they can make a well-informed decision, either to proceed confidently or address any issues that may arise based on the data and testing results available within their systems.

There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps. Also, traceability between various entities is of paramount importance. When introducing a new requirement or user story, it's crucial to establish links to associated defects, track test runs, and monitor test statuses. This traceability allows us to comprehensively map and document every aspect of the application delivery life cycle.

I use the solution in my company to test desktop applications.

The decision-making capabilities of the product help the product grow.

The product is easy to use.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab’s price could be better. They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model.

The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time. 

We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it. 

We are a system integrator and this is one of the solutions that we provide for our customers.

The deployment model varies depending on the customer because some use this solution on-premises, and others use the cloud version.

The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization.

The integration with Oracle projects is very simple and easy to use.

I don't know because I haven't been able to implement at the two customers where I have tried to.

I try to find the backs and try to pull the future and quality of the development. For me, it's a great idea, but the tool is not finished now.

The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare. Your app or your website won't behave on an emulator like it will on a real mobile device, no matter how great the emulator is - even if it's the one that comes from the OS developer that ships with the development studio. There's just no substitute for a real mobile device with its hardware constraints and the way it will behave in the hands of a user.

We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it. Right now, the way that we're managing it is we're requiring no clients are able to access it, so if we do happen to see something that belongs to another project, it's not a big deal. But true segregation of devices and apps, packaged apps, that have been uploaded to the tool, is something that is important to us. It's not there right now.